Chapter published in:
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 30, Frankfurt
Edited by Ingo Feldhausen, Martin Elsig, Imme Kuchenbrandt and Mareike Neuhaus
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15] 2019
► pp. 220236


Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou
2001The subject-in-situ generalization and the role of case in driving computations. Linguistic inquiry 32(2). 193–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2001Inversion as focalization. In Aafje Hulk & Yves D’Hulst (eds.), Subject inversion in Romance and the theory of Universal Grammar, 60–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2004Aspects of the low IP area. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP (The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 2), 16–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Ur Shlonsky
1995The order of verbal complements: A comparative study. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13(3). 489–526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bertocci, Davide & Federico Damonte
2007Distribuzione e morfologia dei congiuntivi in alcune varietà salentine. In Federico Damonte & Jacopo Garzonio (eds.), Studi sui dialetti della Puglia, 3–28. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
Blasco Ferrer, Eduardo
1988Le parlate dell’Alta Ogliastra. Analisi dialettologica. Saggio di storia linguistica e culturale. (Studi di linguistica sarda 1). Cagliari: Edizioni della Torre.Google Scholar
Blasco Ferrer, Eduardo, Michel Contini, Ines Loi Corvetto & Heinz Jürgen Wolf
1988Sardisch: Interne Sprachgeschichte, I: Grammatik/Evoluzione della grammatica; II: Lexik/Evoluzione del lessico; III: Onomastik/Evoluzione dell’onomastica. In Günter Holtus, Michael Metzeltin & Christian Schmitt (eds.), Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik, IV: Italienisch, Korsisch, Sardisch/Italiano, corso, sardo, 836–884. Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea
1992The lack of infinitival clauses in Salentino: a synchronic analysis. In Christiane Lauefer & Terrell A. Morgan (eds.), Theoretical Analyses in Romance Linguistics. Selected Papers from the Nineteenth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL XIX) The Ohio State University, 21–23 April 1989, 267–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1993The sentential complementation of Salentino: a study of a language without infinitival clauses. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Syntactic Theory and the Dialects of Italy, 28–98. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
1998A second thought on Emarginazione: Destressing vs. Right Dislocation. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 117–35. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo
1999A comparative analysis of left and right dislocation in Romance. Studia Linguistica 53(1). 40–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costa, João
2004Subject positions and interfaces: the case of European Portuguese. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gallego, Ángel J.
2013Object shift in Romance. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31(2). 409–451. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Groothuis, Kim A.
in prep. Reflexes of finiteness in Romance. University of Cambridge PhD thesis.
2017Sardinian inflected infinitives and control. In Elena Buja, Stanca Măda & Mona Arhire (eds.), (De/Re)contextualisation. Structure, use, and meaning, 71–94. Braşov: Editura Universităţii Transilvania din Braşov.Google Scholar
2018Empirical and Analytical Problems of the Romance Inflected Infinitive: The State of the Art. In Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Adina Dragomirescu & Alexandru Nicolae (eds.), Comparative and Diachronic Perspectives on Romance Syntax, 289–324. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Jones, Michael Allan
1992Infinitives with specified subjects in Sardinian. In Christiane Lauefer & James Morgan (eds.), Theoretical Analyses in Romance Linguistics: Selected papers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XIX, Ohio State University, April 21 23 1989, 295–309. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1993Sardinian syntax. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
1998Variation in the Romance infinitive: the case of the Southern Calabrian inflected infinitive. Transactions of the Philological Society 96(1). 1–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000A comparative syntax of the dialects of Southern Italy: a minimalist approach. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
2013Greek disguised as Romance? The case of Southern Italy. In Mark Janse, Brian D. Joseph, Angela Ralli & Metin Bagriacik (eds.), MGDLT5. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory, 184–227. Patras: Laboratory of Greek dialects, University of Patras.Google Scholar
2015Reconstructing Complementiser-drop in the Dialects of the Salento: A Syntactic or Phonological Phenomenon? In Mary Theresa Biberauer & George Walkenden (eds.), Syntax Over Time: Lexical, Morphological, and Information-structural Interactions, 146–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
López, Luis
2009A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele
1997Puglia and Salento. In Martin Maiden & Mair Parry (eds.), The dialects of Italy, 338–348. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Manzini, Maria Rita & Leonardo Maria Savoia
2005I dialetti italiani e romanci: morfosintassi generativa. 3 vols. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Mensching, Guido
2000Infinitive constructions with specified subjects: A syntactic analysis of the Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mensching, Guido & Eva-Maria Remberger
2016Sardinian. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, 270–291. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco
1998Post-verbal asymmetries in Spanish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16(2). 313–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000The clausal structure of Spanish: a comparative study. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Pisano, Simone
2008L’infinito flesso in alcune varietà sarde moderne: coincidenza formale con l’imperfetto congiuntivo etimologico? Bollettino linguistico campano 13(1/2). 25–48.Google Scholar
Raposo, Eduardo
1987Case theory and Infl-to-Comp: The inflected infinitive in European Portuguese. Linguistic inquiry 18. 85–109.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1982Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
2003Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard
1969Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Sitaridou, Ioanna
2002The Synchrony and Diachrony of Romance Infinitives with Nominative Subjects. University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Squillaci, Maria-Olimpia
2016When Greek meets Romance: a morphosyntactic analysis of language contact in Aspromonte. University of Cambridge PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Taylor, Cameron
2014Aspects of clause structure in Nicotrese. A descriptive account. University of Cambridge PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Vecchio, Paola
2010The distribution of the complementizers /ka/ and /ku/ in the north Salentino dialect of Francavilla Fontana (Brindisi). In Roberta D’Alessandro, Adam Ledgeway & Ian G. Roberts (eds.), Syntactic Variation: The Dialects of Italy, 312–322. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Virdis, Maurizio
2015Le proposizioni infinitive in sardo. In Maria Grazia Busà & Sara Gesuato (eds.), Lingue e contesti. Studi in onore di Alberto M. Mioni. Padova: CLEUP.Google Scholar
Wagner, Max Leopold
1951La lingua sarda. Storia, spirito e forma. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar