Agreement and pronouns
Implications for partial control
This chapter compares the workings of agreement mismatches involving the French pronoun on with those involving PRO in partial control (PC) environments in order to advance our understanding of the type of plurality that has been assumed to be associated with the latter. The theoretical framework used to effect this comparison is the two-step theory of Agree argued for by Arregi and Nevins (2012) and Smith (2017). The evidence uncovered suggests that whatever is assumed to induce the plurality of PC PRO (e.g. Landau’s (2016b) associative morpheme) leaves neither morphological nor semantic agreement footprints. We also show that, on the LF side, the type of plural set denoted by PC PRO appears to be immune to any sort of quantificational manipulation. We are thus left with an inference of plurality with no tangible grammatical correlates, which points in the direction of a process of pragmatic associative reference along the lines of Haug (2014).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Agreement mismatches with pronouns
- 3.Agree and syntactically-dependent depictive secondary predicates
- 4.On some agreement puzzles for PC PRO
- 4.1Floated quantifiers
- 4.2Agreement mismatches and the features of PC PRO
- 5.Concluding remarks
-
Notes
-
References
References (30)
Ardid-Gumiel, Ana
2001 “
The Syntax of Depictives. Subjects, Modes of Judgement and I-L/S-L Properties.” In
Proceedings of the Workshop on the Syntax of Predication, ed. by
N. Zhang, 1–26. Berlin: Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft (ZAS).
Arregi, Karlos, and Andrew Nevins
2012 Morphotactics: Basque Auxiliaries and the Structure of Spellout. Dordrecht: Springer.
Authier, J.-Marc, and Lisa Reed
2018 “
Symmetric Reciprocal Semantics as a Predictor of Partial Control.”
Linguistic Inquiry 49: 379–393.
Benmamoun, Elabbas, Archna Bhatia, and Maria Polinsky
Bowers, John
2008 “
On Reducing Control to Movement.”
Syntax 11: 125–143.
Bruening, Benjamin
2018 “
Depictive Secondary Predicates and Small Clause Approaches to Argument Structure.”
Linguistic Inquiry 49: 537–559.
Clark, Herbert, and Catherine Marshall
1981 “
Definite Reference and Mutual Knowledge.” In
Elements of Discourse Understanding, ed. by
A. Joshi,
B. Webber, and
I. Sag, 10–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, Greville
1983 Hierarchies, Targets and Controllers: Agreement Patterns in Slavic. London: Croon Helm.
Creissels, Denis
2011 “
Impersonal Pronouns and Coreference: Two Case Studies.” Unpublished ms., University of Lyon, France.
Duffey, Patrick
2014 Reclaiming Control as a Semantic and Pragmatic Phenomenon. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haug, Dag Trygve Truslew
2014 “
The Anaphoric Semantics of Partial Control.” In
Proceedings of SALT 24, ed. by
T. Snider,
S. D’Antonio, and
M. Weigand, 213–233. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Linguistics Circle.
Hornstein, Norbert
2001 Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal. Oxford: Blackwell.
Irimia, Monica-Alexandrina
2005 “
Types of Secondary Predication.”
Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 25: 20–29.
Kathol, Andreas
2000 “
Agreement and the Syntax-Morphology Interface in HPSG.” In
Studies in Contemporary Phrase Structure Grammar, ed. by
R. Levine, and
G. Green, 223–274. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Landau, Idan
2000 Elements of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Landau, Idan
2016a “
Against the Null Comitative Analysis of Partial Control.”
Linguistic Inquiry 47: 572–580.
Landau, Idan
2016b “
Agreement at PF: An Argument from Partial Control.”
Syntax 19: 79–109.
Lawler, John
1972 A Problem in Participatory Democracy. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Marušič, Franc, Tatjana Marvin, and Rok Žaucer
2003 “
Depictive Secondary Predication with No PRO.” Paper presented at the 5th European Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages, Leipzig University.
[URL]
Morgan, Jerry
1984 “
Some Problems of Determination in English Number Agreement.” In
Proceedings of the 1st Eastern States Conference in Linguistics, ed. by
G. Alvarez,
B. Brodie, and
T. McCoy, 69–78. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
Nunes, Jairo
2001 “
Sideward Movement.”
Linguistic Inquiry 32: 303–344.
Nunes, Jairo
2004 Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Pearson, Hazel
2013 The Sense of Self: Topics in the Semantics of de se expressions. Boston, MA: Harvard University dissertation.
Pylkkänen, Liina
2008 Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ritchie, Katherine
2014 “
Collective Nouns: Polysemy and Predication.” Paper presented at the 2014 Meeting of the Philosophical Linguistics and Linguistical Philosophy Conference in Tarrytown, NY.
Roberts, Ian
1988 “
Predicative APs.”
Linguistic Inquiry 19: 703–710.
Smith, Peter
2015 “
Feature Mismatches: Consequences for Syntax, Morphology and Semantics.” University of Connecticut dissertation, Storrs, CT.
Smith, Peter
2017 “
The Syntax of Semantic Agreement in English.”
Journal of Linguistics 53: 823–863.
Stowell, Tim
1981 Origins of Phrase Structure. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA dissertation.
Wurmbrand, Susi
2017 “
Formal and Semantic Agreement in Syntax: A Dual Feature Approach.” In
Language Use and Linguistic Structure, ed. by
J. Emonds, and
M. Janebová, 19–36. Olomouc: Palacky University.
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Landau, Idan
2024.
Noncanonical Obligatory Control.
Language and Linguistics Compass 18:3
Reed, Lisa A.
2020.
On Single and Two-Tiered Approaches to Control.
Languages 5:4
► pp. 71 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.