Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16: Selected papers from the 47th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Newark, Delaware
Edited by Irene Vogel
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16] 2020
► pp. 77–92

Number as an adjunct in Romance

| University of Campinas
| Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
In this paper, we argue that Spanish (and other Romance languages such as Catalan), contrary to what has been believed up to now, patterns with languages such as Brazilian Portuguese and French. We present several different arguments to support our proposal that in the Romance languages we investigate plural marking is specified and interpreted on functional categories, namely on Determiners. We propose that in these languages plural marking is a syntactic adjunct to D (i.e., a categorized d root) by default, and to a categorized n root in marked cases. Manifestations of (plural) Number on other constituents within the nominal domain are to be considered solely as the output of morphophonological agreement or concord.
Keywords: pluralizer, adjunct, determiner, nominalizer, Romance
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Number is encoded and interpreted on D
    • 2.1Arguments from the literature
    • 2.2Additional arguments
  • 3.Analysis
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.16.06cyr
References (42)
References
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2016. “The Syntax of Number.” Talk given at the Workshop on the Semantic Contribution of Det and Num: (In)definiteness, Genericity and Referentiality . Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, May 27–28.
Bartsch, Renate. 1973. “The Semantics and Syntax of Number and Numbers.” In Syntax and Semantics 2, ed. by John Kimball, 51–93. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Michael Ruisdael. 1975. Some Extensions of a Montague Fragment of English. Los Angeles, CA: University of California at Los Angeles dissertation, distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring Sense. Vol I: In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Denis. 2002. Adjectives, Number and Interfaces. Why Languages Vary. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Butler, Lindsay K. 2012. “The DP-Adjoined Plural in Yucatec Maya and the Syntax of Plural Marking.” Ms., University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
Caponigro, Ivano. 2002. “Free Relatives as DPs with a Silent D and a CP Complement.” In Proceedings of WECOL 2000, ed. by Vida Samiian, 140–150. Fresno: California State University, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Cavirani, Edoardo. 2018. “The Distribution of Gender and Number in Lunigiana Nominal Expressions.” In Advances in Italian dialectology: Sketches of Italo-Romance Grammars, ed. by Roberta D’Alessandro, and Diego Pescarini, 13–51. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. “Derivation by Phase.” In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz ed. by, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cyrino, Sonia, and M. Teresa Espinal. 2015. “Bare Nominals in Brazilian Portuguese: More on the DP/NP Analysis.” Natural Language and Linguistics Theory 33: 471–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie, and Martina Wiltschko. 2002. “Decomposing Pronouns.” Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delfitto, Denis, and Jan Schroten. 1991. “Bare Plurals and the Number Affix in DP.” Probus 3: 155–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delicado-Cantero, Manuel, and Sandro Sessarego. 2011. “Variation and Syntax in Number Expression in Afro-Bolivian Spanish.” In Proceedings of the 13th Hispanic Linguistic Symposium, ed. by Luis A. Ortiz-López, 42–53. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Déprez, Viviane. 2005. “Morphological Number, Semantic Number and Bare Nouns.” Lingua 115: 857–883. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “On the Conceptual Role of Number.” In New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics: Vol. I: Morphology, Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics, ed. by Chiyo Nishida, and Jean-Pierre Y. Montreuil, 67–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Despić, Miloje. 2015. “Phases, Reflexives and Definiteness.” Syntax 18: 201–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 2012. “Number as a Feature.” In Functional Heads, ed. by Laura Brugè, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, and Cecilia Poletto, 304–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Etxeberria, Urtzi. 2014. “Basque Nominals: From a System with Bare Nouns to a System Without.” HAL Id: artxibo-01071708 [URL]. DOI logo
Harley, Heidi. 2009. “Compounding in Distributed Morphology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, ed. by Rochelle Lieber, and Pavol Stekauer, 129–144. Oxford, OUP Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hausser, Roland. 1974. Quantification in Extended Montague Grammar. Austin, TX: University of Texas dissertation.Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline, and Roberto Zamparelli. 2005. “Friends and Colleagues: Plurality, Coordination, and the Structure of DP.” Natural Language Semantics 13: 201–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kornfeld, Laura, and Andrés Saab. 2004. “Nominal Ellipsis and Morphological Structure in Spanish.” In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2002, ed. by Reineke Bok-Bennema, Bart Hollebrandse, B. Kampers-Manhe, and Petra Sleeman, 183–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lekakou, Marika, and Kriszta Szendrői. 2012. “Polydefinites in Greek: Ellipsis, Close Apposition and Expletive Determiners.” Journal of Linguistics 48 (1): 107–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. “Reference and Proper Names.” Linguistic Inquiry 25: 609–665. [URL]Google Scholar
Lopes, Ruth. 2006. “Bare Nouns and DP Number Agreement in the Acquisition of Brazilian Portuguese.” In Selected Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. by Nuria Sagarra, and Almeida Jacqueline Toribio, 252–262. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Manzini, Maria Rita, and Leonardo Maria Savoia. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanzi. Alessandria: Edizioni Dell'Orso.Google Scholar
Mathieu, Eric. 2009. “From Local Blocking to Cyclic Agree.” In Determiners: Universals and Variations, ed. by Jila Ghomeshi, Ileana Paul, and Martina Wiltschko, 123–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Many a Plural.” In Weak Referentiality, ed. by Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn, and Joost Zwarts, 157–181. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomino, Natascha. 2012. Partial or complete lack of plural agreement. In Inflection and Word Formation in Romance Languages, ed. by Sascha Gaglia and Marc-Olivier Hinzelin, 201–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Real Academia Española (RAE). 2009. Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Ilza, and Sonia Cyrino. 2012. “A estrutura do DP no crioulo de Cabo Verde e no PB de afro-descendentes.” Revista Letras UFPR 84: 169–195.Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth. 1991. “Two Functional Categories in Noun Phrases.” Syntax and Semantics 25: 37–62.Google Scholar
. 1992. “Cross-Linguistic Evidence for Number Phrase.” Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 37: 197–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sauerland, Uli. 2003. “A New Semantics for Number.” In SALT XIII, ed. by R. Young, and Y. Zhou, 258–275. Ithaca: Cornell University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarzschild, Roger. 1996. Pluralities. Vol. 61 (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scherre, Maria Marta Pereira. 1994. “Aspectos da concordância de número no português do Brasil.” Revista Internacional de Língua Portuguesa 12: 37–49.Google Scholar
Scherre, Maria Marta Pereira, and Anthony Julius Naro. 1998. “Restrições sintáticas e semânticas no controle da concordância verbal em português.” Fórum Linguístico 1: 45–71.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1983. “The Possessor that Ran Away from Home.” The Linguistic Review 3: 89–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrego, Esther. 1987. “On Empty Categories in Nominals”. Ms., UMass. Boston.Google Scholar
de Vries, Mark. 2000. “Appositive Relative Clauses.” Linguistics in the Netherlands 17: 221–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. 2008. “The Syntax of Non-Inflectional Plural Marking.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 639–694. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Guy, Gregory R.
2020. Trajectories of change in Spanish and Portuguese in the Americas. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 16], ► pp. 134 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.