Abels, Klaus
2010 “Factivity in Exclamatives is a Presupposition.” Studia Linguistica 64: 141–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adger, David, and Gillian Ramchand
2005 “Merge vs. Move: Wh-Dependencies Revisited.” Linguistic Inquiry 36 (2): 161–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, Anne
2014Exclamatives en -tu, donc et assez en français québécois. Montreal, Quebec: Université de Montréal dissertation.Google Scholar
Bibis, Nick, and Yves Roberge
2004 “Marginal Clitics.” Lingua 114 (8): 1015–1034. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burnett, Heather, and Mireille Tremblay
2012 “An Extra-Strong NPI? Pantoute in Quebec French.” UCLA WPL 17: 1–8.Google Scholar
Dubois, Caroline
2000La Grammaire de l’exclamation: Aspects théoriques, français de référence et français québécois. Sherbrooke, Quebec: Université de Sherbrooke MA Thesis.Google Scholar
Heim, Johannes, Hermann Keupdjio, Zoe Wai-ManLam, Adriana Osa-Gómez, and Martina Wiltschko
2014 “How to Do Things with Particles.” Proceedings of the CLA, 1–15.Google Scholar
Isac, Daniela
2015The Morphosyntax of Imperatives. OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
2016 “The Silence of Heads.” Studies in Chinese Linguistics 37 (1): 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
2001 “The Mirative and Evidentiality.” Journal of Pragmatics 33 (3): 369–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A., and Knud Lambrecht
1996 “Toward a Construction-Based Model of Language Function: The Case of Nominal Extraposition.” Language 72: 215–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morin, Annick
2017Questioning Particles: A Cross-Linguistic Approach to Quebec French Polar Interrogatives. Toronto: University of Toronto dissertation.Google Scholar
Noonan, Máire, B.
1992Case and Syntactic Geometry. Montreal, Quebec: McGill University dissertation.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David, and Esther Torrego
2007 “The Syntax of Valuation and the Interpretability of Features.” In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture. Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation. Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 101, ed. by S. Karimi, V. Samiian, and W. K. Wilkins, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia, and Raffaella Zanuttini
2003 “Making Imperatives: Evidence from Central Rhaetoromance.” In The Syntax of Italian Dialects, ed. by C. Tortora, 175–207. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
2006 “Subject Clitics and Complex Inversion.” In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, ed. by Martin Everaert, and Henk van Riemsdijk, 601–659. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul
2004 “The Semantics of Imperatives Within a Theory of Clause Types.” Semantics and Linguistic Theory 14: 235–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rett, Jessica
2011 “Exclamatives, Degrees and Speech Acts.” Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (5): 411–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “A Degree Account of Exclamatives.” In Proceedings of SALT XVIII, ed. by J. Rett, T. Friedman, and S. Ito, 601–618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowlett, Paul
2007The Syntax of French. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speas, Peggy, and Carol Tenny
2003 “Configurational Properties of Point of View Roles.” In Asymmetry in Grammar 1, ed. by A. M. Di Sciullo, 315–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, Michel
1978La grosse femme d’à côté est enceinte. Leméac.Google Scholar
Vecchiato, Sara
2000 “The ti/tu Interrogative Morpheme in Quebec French.” Generative Grammar in Geneva 1: 141–163.Google Scholar
Vinet, Marie-Thérèse
2000 “Feature Representation and -tu (pas) in Quebec French.” Studia Linguistica 54 (3): 381–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001D’un français à l’autre: La syntaxe de la microvariation. Montreal: Fides.Google Scholar
2002 “ Tu as a (Super) Positive Marker in Quebec French.” In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory (Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’ Groningen, November 2002), ed. by Reineke Bok-Bennema et al., 235–252. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella, and Paul Portner
2003 “Exclamative Clauses: At the Syntax-Semantics Interface.” Language 79 (1): 39–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Rafaella
2008 “Encoding the Addressee in Syntax: Evidence from English Imperative Subjects.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26 (1): 185–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar