Cover not available
Part of
Romance Linguistics 2012: Selected papers from the 42nd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Cedar City, Utah, 20-22 April 2012
Edited by Jason Smith and Tabea Ihsane
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 7] 2015
► pp. 147–170

On the Old French subjunctive

This chapter focuses on the syntax of the subjunctive in Old French (OF), comparing it to Modern French (MF). In MF, obviation effects occur between the subject of a volitional complement and the subject the embedded clause (Ruwet 1984): (1) *Je veux que je parte. *I want-1sg that I leave-1sg-subj ‘I want to leave.’ (2) Je veux partir. I want-1sg to.leave.’ Arteaga (1990) first discussed in a theoretical model the fact that Old French lacked obviation effects: (3) En talent oti qu’ili colpast lej chiefj in desire-m-sg-obl had-3sg that he cut-subj the head ‘Hei desired to cut off hisj head. In (3), the subjects of the main and subordinate clause are coreferential. It will be claimed (contra Arteaga 1990 and Martineau 1994) that obviation in OF, and its evolution into MF, can be explained, if we assume the following: The complementizer que was not required to introduce the subjunctive in OF; Complementizer Deletion triggers V2 word order in subjunctive contexts; and the uninterpretable irrealis feature of CForce is valued by that of Mood via Agree (San Martín 2007), which extends the binding domain for the subordinate clause.

Published online: 28 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.7.10art
References

Old French texts consulted

Berger, Roger
2004 Les séquences de Sainte Eulalie. Paris: Libraire Droz.Google Scholar
Gaston, Paris
1924 La vie de Saint Alexis. Paris: Ancienne Edouard Champion.Google Scholar
Langois, Ernest
2000 Le couronnement de Louis. Paris: Editions Honoré Champion.Google Scholar

Other references:

Adams, Marianne
1987 “From Old French to the Theory of Pro-drop”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5.1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou
1998 “Parameterizing AGR: Word Order, V-movement and EPP-Checking”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16.491–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 “The Subject in situ Generalization and the Role of Case in Driving Computations”. Linguistic Inquiry 32.193–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anglade, Joseph
1965 Grammaire élémentaire de l’ancien français. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Arteaga, Deborah
1990 The Disjoint Reference Requirement in Subjunctive Clauses: Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
1994 “Impersonal Constructions in Old French”. Issues and Theory in Romance Linguistics ed. by Michael Mazzola, 141–156. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1995 Obviation in Romance: Diachronic and Synchronic Perspectives. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
2009 “On the Existence of Null Complementizers in Old French”. Romance Linguistics: Structure, Interfaces, and Microparametric Variation ed. by Pascual Masullo, Erin O’Rourke & Chia-Hui Huang, 19–36. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ed. 2013 Research on Old French: The State of the art. Amsterdam: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arteaga, Deborah & Julia Herschensohn
2004 “Case, Agreement, and Expletives. A Parametric Difference in Old French and Modern French”. Contemporary Approaches to Romance Linguistics ed. by Julie Auger, Clancy Clements & Barbara Vance, 1–15. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Il était une fois: Diachronic Development of Expletives, Case, and Agreement from Latin to Modern French”. Historical Romance Linguistics: Retrospectives and Perspectives ed. by Randall Gess & Deborah Arteaga, 267–286. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bischoff, Fritz
1881 Der Conjunctiv bei Chrestien. Ph.D. dissertation, Friedrich-Wilhem University.Google Scholar
Boase-Beier, Jean & Ken Lodge
2003 The German Language: A Linguistic Introduction. Malden: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brunot, Ferdinand
1966 Histoire de la langue française des origines à nos jours. Paris: Librairie Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Buridant, Claude
2000 Grammaire nouvelle de l’ancien français. Paris: Sedes.Google Scholar
Busse, Carl
1905 Das finale Satzverhältnis in der Entwicklung der französischen Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Göttingen.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1985 Morphology. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994 The Evolution of Grammar, Tense, Aspect, and Modality in Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea
1991 “The Lack of Infinitival Clauses in Salentino: a Synchronic Analysis”. Theoretical Analyses in Romance Linguistics ed. by Christiane Laeufer & Terrell A. Morgan, 267–294. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2005 “On Phases”. Ms., MIT.
Costantini, Franceso
2005 “On Obviation in Subjunctive Clauses: The State of the Art”. Annali di Ca’Foscari 44.97–132.Google Scholar
2007 “On Tense Mismatch and a Morphosyntactic Theory of Sequence of Tenses”. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 32.39–64.Google Scholar
2009 Interface Perspectives on Clausal Complementation: The Case of Subjunctive Obviation. Venice: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarino Venezia.Google Scholar
De Lage, Guy Raynaud
1975 Introduction à l’ancien français. Paris: Société d’édition d’enseignement supérieur.Google Scholar
Einhorn, Elsabe Carmen
1974 Old French: A Concise Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enc, Murvet
1987 “Anchoring Conditions for Tense”. Linguistic Inquiry 18.633–657.Google Scholar
Ernout, Alfred & François Thomas
1951 Syntaxe latine. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Farkas, Donka
1984 “Subjunctive Complements in Rumanian”. Papers from the XIIth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages ed. by Philip Baldi, 354–372. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foulet, Lucien
1982 Petite syntaxe de l’ancien français. Paris: Librairie Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Gamillscheg, Ernst
1957 Historische französiche Syntax. Tübingen: Max Niewmeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Glikman, Julie & Thomas Verjans
2013 “Old French Parataxis: Syntactic Variant or Stylistic Variation?” Research on Old French: The State of the Art ed. by Deborah Arteaga, 243–260. . Amsterdam: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graeme-Ritchie, Robert Lindsay
1907 Recherches sur la syntaxe de la conjonction “que” en ancien français. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2000 “Scandinavian Stylistic Fronting: How any Category Can Become an Expletive”. Linguistic Inquiry 31.445–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 “Expletives and Agreement in Scandinavian Passives”. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 4.85–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingham, Richard
2013 “A Derivational Approach to Negative Polarity Licensing in Old French”. Research on Old French: The State of the Art ed. by Deborah Arteaga, 261–281. Amsterdam: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakubowicz, Celia
1985 “Do Binding Principles Apply to INFL?” NELS15.188–206.Google Scholar
Jensen, Frede
1974 The Syntax of the Old French Subjunctive. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1990 Old French and Comparative Gallo-Romance Syntax. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempchinsky, Paula
1986 Romance Subjunctive Clauses and Logical Form. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
1990 “Más sobre el efecto de la referencia disjunta del subjuntivo”. In Indicativo y subjuntivo ed. by Ignacio Bosque, 234–258. Madrid: Ediciones Taurus.Google Scholar
2009 “What Can the Subjunctive Disjoint Reference Effect Tell us about the Subjunctive?” Lingua 119.1788–1810. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kowalski, Richard
1882 Der Conjunctiv bei Wace. Ph.D. dissertation, Georg-August University of Göttingen.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard & Juan Uriagereka
2005 A Course in Minimalist Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1999 The Development of Language: Acquisition, change, and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Marnette, Sophie
2013 “Forms and Functions of Reported Discourse in Medieval French”. Research on Old French: The State of the Art ed. by Deborah Arteaga, 299–326. Amsterdam: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martineau, France
1994 “The Expression of the Subjunctive in Older French”. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 32.45–69.Google Scholar
Mathieu, Éric
2013 “The Left-periphery in Old French”. Research on Old French: The State of the Art ed. by Deborah Arteaga, 327–350. Amsterdam: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ménard, Pierre
1988 Syntaxe de l’ancien français. Paris: Bordeaux Éditions Bière.Google Scholar
Moignet, Gérard
1959 Essai sur le mode subjonctif en latin postclassique et en ancien français. Alger: Imbert.Google Scholar
1988 Grammaire de l’ancien français. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Muller, Henri & Pauline Taylor
1932 A Chrestomathy of Vulgar Latin. New York: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
Nyrop, Kristoffer
1930–1935 Grammaire historique de la langue française, 6 vols. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel.Google Scholar
Ormazabal, Javier
1995 The Syntax of Complementation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Picallo, M. Carme
1985 Opaque Domains. Ph.D. dissertation, CUNY.Google Scholar
Quiehl, Karl
1881 Der Gebrauch des Konjunktivs in dem ältesten französichen Sprachdenkmälern bis zum Rolandsliede einschiesslich. PhD. dissertation, University of Kiel.Google Scholar
Rivero, Marisa
1994 “Clause Structure and V-movement in the Languages of the Balkans”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12.63–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery”. Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1993 Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: A comparative history of English and French. Norwell: Kluwer. Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
1993 Syntactic Change. A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rochette, Anne
1988 Semantics and Syntactic Aspects of Romance Sentential Complementation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Ruwet, N
1984 “ ‘Je veux partir/Je veux que je parte.’ À propos de la distribution des complétives à temps fini et des compléments à l’infinitif en français”. Cahiers de grammaire 7.76–138.Google Scholar
San Martín, Itziar
2007 “Beyond the Infinitive vs. Subjunctive Rivalry: Surviving Changes in Mood”. Coreference Modality, and Focus: Studies on the syntax-semantics interface ed. by Luis Eguren & Olga Fernández-Soriano, 171–190. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schnellbächer, Karl
Über den syntactischen Gebrauch des Conjunctivs in den Chansons de Geste. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Giessen.
Togeby, Knud
1974 Précis historique de grammaire française. Odense: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Vance, Barbara
1997 Syntactic Change in Medieval French. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webelhuth, Gert
1992 Principles and Parameters of Syntactic Saturation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winters, Margaret
2013 “Grammatical Meaning and the Old French Subjunctive”. Research on Old French: The State of the Art ed. by Deborah Arteaga, 351–376. Amsterdam: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Emil
1884 Zur Syntax des Verbums bei Adenet le Roi. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kiel.Google Scholar
Zagona, Karen
1989 “On the Non-isomorphism of Morphological Tense and Temporal Interpretation”. Studies in Romance Linguistics ed. by Karl Kirschner & Janet de Cesaris, 479–494. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990 “Times as Temporal-argument Structure”. Paper presented at the conference Time in Language , MIT.
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Arteaga, Deborah L.
2019. Obviation and Old French Subjunctive Clauses. In Contributions of Romance Languages to Current Linguistic Theory [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 95], ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.