The perfect between Latin and Romance
The rise of perfective periphrases and the active/inactive contrast
The development of Romance periphrastic perfect forms, in particular of HABERE + Past Participle, has often been claimed to be the result of a grammaticalization process. Proponents of this approach argue that the Latin verb HABERE (‘to have’) gradually underwent a change of status from lexical to functional, following a systematic path (Harris 1982, a.o.). This study will present evidence to show that this hypothesis comes up against both empirical and theoretical issues. Conversely, it will illustrate that the emergence of Romance perfective periphrases might be more correctly considered a consequence of the active/inactive alignment characterizing the Latin verbal system. This approach will also pave the way to an understanding of the rise of modern auxiliation patterns from a diachronic point of view.
References (47)
References
Adams, James. 2013. Social Variation and the Latin Language. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alexiadou, Artemis, and Elena Anagnostopoulou. 1999. “Non-active Morphology and the Direction of Transitivity Alternations.” NELS 29: Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society: 27-40.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alexiadou, Artemis, and Elena Anagnostopoulou. 2004. “Voice Morphology in the Causative-inchoative Alternation: Evidence for a Non-unified Structural Analysis of Unaccusatives.” In The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations at the Syntax-Lexicon Interface, ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou, and Martin Everaert, 114-136. Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou, and Florian Schäfer. 2006. “The Properties of Anti-causatives Crosslinguistically.” In Phases of Interpretation, ed by Mara Frascarelli, 187-212. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baerman, Matthew. 2006. The Location of Deponency. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 48: 1-19.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Βaerman, Matthew. 2007. “Morphological Typology of Deponency.” In Deponency and Morphological Mismatches, ed. by Matthew Βaerman, Greville Corbett, Dunstan Brown, and Andrew Hippisley, 1-19. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bentley, Delia. 2006. Split Intransitivity in Italian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cennamo, Michela. 1999.“Inaccusatività tardo-latina e suoi riflessi in testi italiani antichi centro-meridionali.” Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 115 (2): 300-331. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cennamo, Michela. 2002. “La selezione degli ausiliari perfettivi in napoletano antico: fenomeno sintattico o sintattico-semantico?” Archivio Glottologico Italiano 87 (2): 175-222.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cyrino, Sonia. 2009. “XP-movement of Participles and the Rise of Periphrastic Tenses in Romance.” Paper presented at the 19th Colloquium of Generative Grammar, University of the Basque Country, April 2009.
D’Alessandro, Roberta, and Ian Roberts. 2010. “Past Participle Agreement in Abruzzese: Split Auxiliary Selection and the Null Subject Parameter.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28: 41-72. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Embick, David. 1997. Voice and the Interfaces of Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Embick, David. 2000. “Features, Syntax, and Categories in the Latin Perfect”. Linguistic Inquiry 31 (2): 185–230. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Folli, Raffaella, and Heidi Harley. 2005. “Flavours of v: Consuming Results in Italian and English.” In Aspectual Inquiries, ed. by Paula Kempchinsky, and Roumyana Slabakova, 95-120. Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gianollo, Chiara. 2005. “Middle Voice in Latin and the Phenomenon of Split Intransitivity.” In Latina Lingua! Proceedings of the 12th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, ed. by Gualtiero Calboli, 97-109. Roma: Herder.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gianollo, Chiara. 2010. “I verbi deponenti latini e l’unità della flessione in –r.” Incontri Triestini di Filologia Classica VIII: 23-49.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harley, Heidi. 2013. “External Arguments and the Mirror Principle. On the Distinctness of Voice and v.” Lingua 125: 34-57. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harre, Catherine E. 1991. Tener + Past Participle. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, Martin. 1982. “The ‘Past Simple’ and the ‘Present Perfect’ in Romance.” In Studies in the Romance Verb, ed. by Nigel Vincent, and Martin Harris, 42- 70. London: Croom Helm.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, Paul J, and Elisabeth Closs Traugott. 2013. Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kayne, Richard. 1993. “Toward a Modular Theory of Auxiliary Selection.” Studia Linguistica 47: 381-405. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. “Severing the External Argument from its Verb.” In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, ed. by Johan Rooryck, and Laura Zaring, 109 – 137. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
La Fauci, Nunzio. 1988. Oggetti e soggetti nella formazione della morfosintassi romanza. Pisa: Giardini.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
La Fauci, Nunzio. 1997. Per una teoria grammaticale del mutamento morfosintattico. Dal latino verso il romanzo. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
La Fauci, Nunzio. 1998. “Riflettendo sul cambiamento morfosintattico: nel latino verso il romanzo.” In SintAnt. La sintassi dell’italiano antico, ed. by Maurizio Dardano, and Gianluca Frenguelli, 237-252. Roma: Aracne.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lazzeroni, Romano. 1990. “La diatesi come categoria linguistica: studio sul medio indoeuropeo.” In Studi e saggi linguistici XXX, 1-22.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ledgeway, Adam. 1998. “Avé(re) and Esse(re) Alternation in Neapolitan.” In Studies on the Syntax of Central Romance Languages,ed. by Olga Fullana, and Francesc Roca, 123– 147. Università di Girona.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ledgeway, Adam. 2000. A Comparative Syntax of the Dialects of Southern Italy: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford/New York: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ledgeway, Adam. 2009. Grammatica diacronica del napoletano. Tübingen: Max Neymeier Verlag. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ledgeway, Adam. 2012. From Latin to Romance. Morphosyntactic Typology and Change. Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Loporcaro, Michele. 2007. “On Triple Auxiliation.” Linguistics 45: 173-222. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manzini, Rita, and Leonardo Savoia. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Migliori, Laura. 2014. “v as a Field. Evidence from the Latin Verbal System.” In NELS 44: Proceedings of the Forty-fourth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol. 2, ed. by Jyoti Iyer, and Leland Kusmer, 27-38. University of Massachusetts.
Migliori, Laura. In press. “Alcune note diacroniche sull’ausiliazione perfettiva nei dialetti italiani centro-meridionali.” In Actes du XXVIIe congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes, ed. by Alain Lemaréchal, Peter Koch, and Pierre Swiggers. Strasbourg: Société de linguistique romane/ÉLiPhi.
Panhuis, Dirk. 2006. Latin Grammar. The University of Michigan Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinkster, Harm. 1987. “The Strategy and Chronology of the Development of Future and Perfect Tense Auxiliaries in Latin”. In The Historical Development of Auxiliaries, ed. by Martin Harris, and Paolo Ramat, 193-223. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, Tanya. 2002. “The Theta System–An Overview.” Theoretical Linguistics 28: 229-290.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stolova, Natalya. 2006. “Split intransitivity in Old Spanish.” Revue roumaine de linguistique LI (2): 301-320.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tuttle, Edward F. 1986. “The Spread of ESSE as Universal Auxiliary in Central Italo-Romance.” Medioevo romanzo 11: 229-287.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vincent, Nigel. 1982. “The Development of the Auxiliaries habere and esse in Romance”. In Studies in the Romance Verb, ed. by Nigel Vincent, and Martin Harris, 71-96. London: Croom Helm.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zamboni, Alberto. 2000. Alle origini dell’italiano. Dinamiche e tipologie della transizione dal latino. Roma: Carocci.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)