Productivity and Portuguese morphology
How experiments enable hypothesis-testing
This paper examines to what extent, as evidenced by productivity studies, just as the robustness and learnability of phonological patterns may be grounded and biased by naturalness considerations, so may morphology. Four case studies (L-morphomes, competing nominalizing affixes, athematic participles, and defective verbs), that are carried out with experimental tasks using wug-words, jointly demonstrate that choices in the realization of morphological categories may depend on submorphemic (features) and supramorphemic (phrasal syntax) principles, and show that both morphology-internal and interface considerations may modulate the extent of productivity of generalizations.
References
Albright, Adam
2009 “
Lexical and Morphological Conditioning of Paradigm gaps.” In
Modeling Ungrammaticality, ed. by
Curt Rice, and
Sylvia Blaho, 117–164. London: Equinox Publishing.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, Stephen
1981 “
Why Phonology Isn’t ‘Natural’.”
Linguistic Inquiry 12: 493-539.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, Stephen
1992 A-morphous Morphology. Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anshen, Frank, and Mark Aronoff
1997 “
Morphology in Real Time.” In
Yearbook of Morphology, ed. by
Geert Booij, and
Jaap van Marle, 9–12. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aronoff, Mark
1994 Morphology by Itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bachrach, Asaf, and Andrew Nevins
(eds) 2008 Inflectional Identity. Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Becker, Michael, Nihan Ketrez, and Andrew Nevins
2011 “
The surfeit of the Stimulus: Analytic Biases Filter Lexical Statistics in Turkish Devoicing Neutralization.”
Language 87: 84–125.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berent, Iris, Tracy Lennertz, Paul Smolensky, and Vered Vaknin-Nusbaum
Listeners’ Knowledge of Phonological Universals: Evidence from Nasal Clusters.”
Phonology 26: 75-108.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Blevins, Juliette
2004 Evolutionary Phonology. Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bobaljik, Jonathan
2012 Universals in Comparative Morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bourne, L.E
1970 “
Knowing and Using Concepts.”
Psychological Review 77: 546-556.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chagas, Paulo
2007 “
Athematic Participles in Brazilian Portuguese: A Syncretism in the Making.”
Acta Linguistica Hungarica 54: 119–128.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dressler, Wolfgang, Willi Mayerthaler, Oswald Panagl, and Wolfgang Wurzel
Embick, David
2004 “
On the Structure of Resultative Participles in English.”
Linguistic Inquiry 35: 355-292.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feldman, Jacob
2000 “
Minimization of Boolean Complexity in Human Concept Learning.”
Nature 407: 630-633
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Finley, Sara
2012 “
Typological Asymmetries in Round Vowel Harmony: Support from Artificial Grammar Learning.”
Language and Cognitive Processes 27: 1550-1562.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freitas, Maria Luisa
2014 “
Two Nominalizing Suffixes in Brazilian Portuguese: Locality Constraints on Morphophonological Realization.” Generals paper, UNICAMP.
Freitas, Maria Luisa, and Nevins, Andrew
in prep). “
Conjugation-specific Knowledge and Nominalizing Affix Choice.” Unpublished manuscript.
Graf, Thomas
2012 “
An Algebraic Perspective on the Person Case Constraint.”
UCLA Working Papers 17: 85-90.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, Mark, and Charles Reiss
2008 The Phonological Enterprise. Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, James
1974 “
Evidence from Portuguese for the “Elsewhere Condition” in Phonology.”
Linguistic Inquiry 5: 61-80.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hayes, Bruce, Donca Steriade, and Robert Kirchner
(eds.)
Phonetically-Based Phonology Cambridge University Press
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Heinz, Jeffrey
2010 “
Learning Long-Distance Phonotactics.”
Linguistic Inquiry, 41: 623-661.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew
2008 “
Monotonicity at the Lexical Semantics-Morphosyntax Interface.” In
Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the Northeast Linguistic Society, Volume 2, ed. by
Emily Elfner, and
Martin Walkow, 15–28. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lindsay, Mark, and Mark Aronoff
2013 “
Natural Selection in Self-Organizing Morphological Systems.” In
Morphology in Toulouse: Selected Proceedings of Décembrettes 7, ed. by
Fabio Montermini,
Gilles Boyé, and
Jesse Tseng. Germany: Lincom Europa.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lobato, Lucia
1999 “
Sobre a forma do particípio do Português e o estatuto dos traços formais.”
DELTA 15.1.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maiden, Martin
2005 “
Morphological Autonomy and Diachrony.” In
Yearbook of Morphology, ed. by
Geert Booij, and
Jaap van Marle, 137–175. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maiden, Martin, and Paul O’Neill
2010 “
On Morphomic Defectiveness: Evidence from the Romance Languages of the Iberian Peninsula.” In
Defective Paradigms: Missing Forms and what they Tell us, ed. by
Matthew Baerman,
Greville Corbett, and
Dunstan Brown, 103-124. Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moreton, Elliott
2008 “
Analytic Bias and Phonological Typology.”
Phonology 25: 83–127.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevins, Andrew, Gean Damulakis, and Maria Luisa Freitas
2014 “
Phonological Regularities among Defective Verbs.”
Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos 56 (1): 11–21.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevins, Andrew, Cilene Rodrigues, and Kevin Tang
2015 “
The Rise and Fall of the L-Shaped Morphome: Diachronic and Experimental Studies.”
Probus 27 (1): 101–155.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevins, Andrew, and Cilene Rodrigues
(
2014) “
Athematic Participle Choice is Predicted by Argument Structure.”
Revista da ABRALIN 13 (2): 225–62.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oltra-Massuet, Isabel
1999 “
On the Notion of Theme Vowel: A New Approach to Catalan Verbal Morphology.”
MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 19. Cambridge, Mass.: MITWPL.
Pertsova, Katya
2011 “Grounding Systematic Syncretism in Learning.
Linguistic Inquiry 42: 225-266.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pesetsky, David
1995 Zero Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Postma, Gertjan
2013 “
Metaphonic Blocking in Portuguese as a Linearization Deadlock.” Paper presented at “Workshop on Metaphony”, Meertens Institute.
Tang, Kevin, and Andrew Nevins
2013 “
Quantifying the Diachronic Productivity of Irregular Verbal Patterns in Romance.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 25.
Steriade, Donca
2008 “
A Pseudo-cyclic Effect in Romanian Morphophonology.” In
Inflectional Identity, ed. by
Asaf Bachrach, and
Andrew Nevins, 313-359. Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zimmer, Karl
1969 “
Psychological Correlates of some Turkish Morpheme Structure Conditions.”
Language 45.2: 309–321.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Chen, Sihan, Richard Futrell & Kyle Mahowald
2023.
An information-theoretic approach to the typology of spatial demonstratives.
Cognition 240
► pp. 105505 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Saldana, Carmen, Borja Herce & Balthasar Bickel
2022.
More or Less Unnatural: Semantic Similarity Shapes the Learnability and Cross-Linguistic Distribution of Unnatural Syncretism in Morphological Paradigms.
Open Mind 6
► pp. 183 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Schwenter, Scott A., Mark Hoff, Eleni Christodulelis, Chelsea Pflum & Ashlee Dauphinais
2019.
Variable past participles in Portuguese perfect constructions.
Language Variation and Change 31:1
► pp. 69 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.