Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Amsterdam 2013
Edited by Enoch O. Aboh, Jeannette Schaeffer and Petra Sleeman
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 8] 2015
► pp. 223–238

Deverbal nominalization with the ‘Down’-operator

| Universität Stuttgart
| Université de Paris 8
We argue that the nominal supine in Romanian is a nominalization by the definite determiner in its interpretation as a ‘Down’-operator, which correlates with an event-kind denotation. We use as evidence the restricted nominal properties of the nominal supine, which indicate that it does not have a typical (overt or covert) nominalizing suffix of the kind that other nominalizations like the nominal infinitive and the nominalized participle have. We further show that among these nominalization patterns, only the semantics of the nominal supine correlates with kinds. Eventually, this case study shows how the nominalizing function of the ‘Down’-operator from Chierchia (1984) can be unified with its kind semantics in Chierchia (1998).
Published online: 2 December 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.8.12ior
References (32)
References
Alexiadou, Artemis, Gianina Iordăchioaia, and Florian Schäfer. 2011. “Scaling the Variation in Romance and Germanic Nominalizations.” In Variation and Change in the Romance and Germanic Noun Phrase, ed. by Harry Perridon, and Petra Sleeman, 25-40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Gianina Iordăchioaia, and Elena Soare. 2010. “Number/ Aspect Interactions in the Syntax of Nominalizations: A DM approach.” Journal of Linguistics 46(3): 537-574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1984. Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds, Ph.D. Dissertation, UMass.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Reference to Kinds across Languages.” Natural Language Semantics 6: 339-405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cocchiarella, Nino. 1974. “Fregean Semantics for a Realist Ontology.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 15: 552-568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornilescu, Alexandra. 2001. “Romanian Nominalizations: Case and Aspectual Structure.” Journal of Linguistics 37 (3): 467-501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. 2004. “Number Marking and (In)definiteness in Kind Terms.” Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (4): 393-450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 2012. “Number as a Feature.” In Functional Heads ed. by Laura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, and Cecilia Poletto. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Kind-reference and Number”. Paper presented at the ‘Incorporation Workshop’, Potsdam, March 12-15.
Gehrke, Berit. To appear. “Adjectival Participles, Event Kind Denotation and Pseudo-incorporation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Iordăchioaia, Gianina. 2013. “The Determiner Restriction in Romance and Germanic Nominalizations.” Paper presented at LSRL 43, CUNY, New York, April 17-19.
. 2014. “The Interaction between nP and DP in Nominalizations.” InIn Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the North-East Linguistic Society (NELS), ed. by Hsin-Lun Huang, Ethan Poole, and Amanda Rysling, vol. 1, 179–190.
Iordăchioaia, Gianina, and Elena Soare. 2008. “Two Kinds of Event Plurals: Evidence from Romanian Nominalizations.” In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 7, ed. by Olivier Bonami, and Patricia Cabredo Hofherr, 193-216. Paris.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Syntactic patterns blocking plural in Romance nominalizations.” In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2007, ed. by Enoh O. Aboh, Elisabeth van der Linden, Josep Quer, and Petra Sleeman, 145-160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “A Further insight into the Syntax-semantics of Pluractionality.” Proceedings of SALT 21: 95-114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. To appear. Pluractionality with Lexically Cumulative Verbs. Natural Language Semantics.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1991. “Parts and Boundaries.” Cognition 41: 9–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2007. “On the Plurality of Verbs.” In Event structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation, ed. by Tatjana Heyde-Zybatow, and Johannes Dölling, 269−299. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Laca, Brenda. 2006. “Indefinites, Quantifiers and Pluractionals: What Scope Effects Tell us about Event Pluralities.” In Non-definiteness and plurality, ed. by Liliane Tasmowski, and Svetlana Vogeleer, 191–217. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landman, Meredith, and Marcin Morzycki. 2003. “Event-Kinds and the Representation of Manner.” In Proceedings of the Western Conference in Linguistics (WECOL) 2002, ed. by Nancy Mae Antrim, Grant Goodall, Martha Schulte-Nafeh, and Vida Samiian. California State University, Fresno.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. “Reference and Proper Names: A Theory of N-Movement in Syntax and Logical Form.” Linguistic Inquiry 25 (4): 609-665.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean. 2008. “On n, √, and Types of Nouns.” In Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology, ed. by Jutta M. Hartmann, Veronika Hegedűs, and Henk van Riemsdijk, 105-144. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 2001. Words. WCCFL XX Handout, USC, February 2001.Google Scholar
McNally, Louise, and Henriette de Swart. 2011. “Inflection and Derivation: How Adjectives and Nouns Refer to Abstract Objects.” Pre-proceedings of the 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, 425-434.
. 2013. “Reference to Properties and via Properties: The Case of Dutch”. Paper presented at the University of Paris 8 – 21, Oct. 2013.
Panagiotidis, E. Phoevos. 2011. “Categorial Features and Categorizers.” The Linguistic Review 28: 325-346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roy, Isabelle, and Elena Soare. 2012. “L’enquêteur, le surveillant et le détenu : les noms déverbaux de participants aux événements, lectures événementielles et structure argumentale”. In Lexique, 20, Nouveaux aspects sur les Nominalisations, ed. by Rafael Marin, and Florence Villoing, 207-231. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Sleeman, Petra, and Ana Maria Brito. 2010. “Nominalization, Event, Aspect, and Argument Structure: a Syntactic Approach.” In Argument Structure from a Crosslinguistic Perspective, ed. by Mara Duguine, Susana Huidobro, and Nerea Madariaga, 113-129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soare, Elena. 2002. Le supin roumain et la théorie des categories mixtes. Ph.D. Dissertation, Université de Paris 8.
Van Geenhoven, Veerle. 2004. “For-adverbials, Frequentative Aspect, and Pluractionality.” Natural Language Semantics 12: 135–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vergnaud, Jean-Roger, and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta. 1992. “The Definite Determiner and the Inalienable Constructions in French and in English.” Linguistic Inquiry 23 (4): 595-652.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Grimm, Scott & Louise McNally
2022. Nominalization and Natural Language Ontology. Annual Review of Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 257 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.