Article published in:
Romance Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 43rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), New York, 17-19 April, 2013
Edited by Christina Tortora, Marcel den Dikken, Ignacio L. Montoya and Teresa O'Neill
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 9] 2016
► pp. 99–118

Epistemic adverbs, the prosody-syntax interface, and the theory of phases

| Dept. of Linguistics, Ca’ Bembo

Epistemic adverbs in Italian (e.g., probabilmente ‘probably’) can appear in several positions. Cinque (1999) proposed that they always occupy the same position above IP and that the various orders are derived via movement of the other phrases around them. In this paper I consider contrasts between sentences where these adverbs are associated with a “normal intonation” and those where they are associated with a parenthetical (comma) intonation. To provide an account for the distribution of parenthetical adverbs, I appeal to Giorgi (2011, to appear). I consider parentheticals as syntactically integrated structures, rejecting adjunction and adopting the cartographic approach, based on Kayne’s (1994) Linear Correspondence Axiom. As for the non-parenthetical occurrences, I propose that there are two basic positions for these adverbs, one for each phase: above v*P and above IP (Cinque’s position). The existence of a low left periphery above v*P agrees has also been recently hypothesized for other phenomena in Old (Poletto, 2006 and to appear) and Modern Italian (Belletti, 2004).

Published online: 03 February 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.9.06gio
References
Andrews, Avery Delano III
1975 “Studies in the Syntax of Relative and Comparative Clauses.” MIT PhD Dissertation.
Burton-Roberts, Noel
2006 “Parentheticals.” In Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 9 (2nd edition), ed. by Keith Brown, 179 – 182. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Banfield, Ann
1982 Unspeakable Sentences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2004 “Aspects of the Low IP Area.” In The Structure of CP and IP, ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 16-51. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola, and Cecilia Poletto
2004 “Topic, Focus and V2: Defining the CP Sublayers.” In The Structure of CP and IP, ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 52 – 75. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1990 Types of A-bar Dependencies. LI Monograph. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2000 “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In Step by Step - Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2002 Derivation by Phase. In Ken Hale: A life in Language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris, and Paul Branigan
1997 “Quotative Inversion.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 15 (1): 1 – 41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole
2007 “The Relation between Syntactic and Prosodic Parenthesis.” In Parentheticals, ed. by Nicole Dehé, and Yordanka Kavalova, 261 – 284. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole, and Yadranka Kavalova
(Eds.) 2007 Parentheticals. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole
2009 “Clausal Parentheticals, Intonational Phrasing, and Prosodic Theory.” Journal of Linguistics 45: 569 – 615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Döring, Sandra
2007 “Quieter, Faster, Lower and Set off by Pauses?” In Parentheticals, ed. by Nicole Dehé, and Yordanka Kavalova, 285 – 307, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doron, Edit
1991 “Point of View as a Factor of Content.” Proceedings of SALT 11, Cornell University : 51 – 64.
Emonds, Joe
1973 “Parenthetical Clauses.” In You Take the High Node and I’ll Take the Low Node, ed. by Corum Claudia, et al., 333 – 347. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Espinal, Maria Teresa
1991 “The Representation of Disjunct Constituents.” Language 67 (4): 726 – 762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra
2010 About the Speaker., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2011 “The Syntax of Commas: An Analysis of Two Types of Parentheticals.” In Universals and Variation, ed. by Gao Ming-le. Beijing: Beijing University Press.Google Scholar
to appear. “Prosodic Signals as Syntactic Formatives in the Left Periphery.” (http://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingbuzz​/001625).
Guéron, Jacqueline
2007 “Remarks on the Grammar of Unspeakable Sentences.” Manuscript. University of Paris X.
Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey Pullum
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1993 “Toward a Modular Theory of Auxiliary Selection.” Lingua 47: 3 – 31.Google Scholar
1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax, LI Monograph. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kavalova, Yodranka
2007  And Parenthetical Clauses. In Parentheticals, ed. by Nicole Dehé, and Yordanka Kavalova, 145 – 172. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1991 “Parenthetical Adverbials: The radical Orphanage Approach.” Aspects of Modern English Linguistics: Papers presented to Masatomo Ukaji on his 60th birthday : 232 – 254.
Poletto, Cecilia
2006 “Parallel Phases: A Study on the High and Low Left Periphery of Old Italian.” Phases of Interpretation 91: 261 – 294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
to appear. Word Order in Old Italian, Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logo
Potts, Christopher
2002 “The Syntax and Semantics of as-parentheticals.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(3): 623 – 689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1983 “Point of View in Language – The Use of Parentheticals.” Essays on Deixis: 169 – 194.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery.” In Elements of Grammar, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281 – 337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John
1973 “Slifting.” The Formal Analysis of Natural Languages: 133 – 169.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe
2004 “Context of Thought and Context of Utterance.” Mind and Language 19: 279 – 304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Lisa
2005 “Comments on intonational phrasing.” In Prosodies, ed. by Sonia Frota, Marina Vigario, and Maria Joao Freitas, 11 – 58. Berlin: Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Sharvit, Yael
2004 “Free indirect discourse and de re pronouns.” Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 14, Cornell University: 305 – 322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tescari Neto, Aquiles
2013 “On Verb Movement in Brazilian Portuguese: A Cartographic Study.” Dissertation, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice
Zanuttini, Raffaella
1997 Negation and Clausal Structure. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Giorgi, Alessandra
2015.  In Discourse-oriented Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 226], ► pp. 229 ff. Crossref logo
Tescari Neto, Aquiles
2022. On the Raising of the Finite Main Verb in Angolan Portuguese and in Mozambican Portuguese: Cartographic Hierarchies, Microvariation and the Use of Adverbs as Diagnostics for Movement. Probus 34:1 ► pp. 171 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.