Some notes on falloir, devoir, and the theory of control
This article sheds new light on the structure and meaning of sentences containing the French modal verbs devoir and falloir, as well as on the syntax and semantics of Control generally. Well-known and previously unnoticed empirical facts are examined that support the author’s novel contention that falloir and devoir are syntactically and semantically ambiguous. These data are also argued to offer indirect support for the analysis of Control clauses recently developed in Reed (2014: Ch. 6 and 7), according to which there is a theoretical primitive (pro) and it is associated with a “minimal” feature bundle consisting of just [−expletive] and [+N] syntactic features, with a separate, post-syntactic Theory of Control determining its understood phi-features.
References (40)
References
Authier, J.-Marc and Lisa Reed. 2009. “French Tough-Movement Revisited.” Probus 21 (1): 1–21. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bach, Emmon. 1979. “Control in Montague Grammar.” Linguistic Inquiry 10 (4): 515–531.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barbiers, Sjef. 1995. The Syntax of Interpretation. The Netherlands: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bošković, Željko. 2007. “The Syntax of Nonfinite Complementation: An Economy Approach.” Minimalist Syntax: The Essential Readings ed. by Željko Bošković and Howard Lasnik, 86–111. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bowers, John. 2002. “Transitivity.” Linguistic Inquiry 33 (2): 183–224. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik. 1995. “The Theory of Principles and Parameters.” The Minimalist Program, Noam Chomsky, 13–127. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culbertson, Jennifer and Géraldine Legendre. 2014. “Prefixal Agreement and Impersonal il in Spoken French: Experimental Evidence.” Journal of French Language Studies 24 (1): 83–105. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dubois, Jean. 1969. Grammaire structurale du français: La phrase et les transformations. Paris: Larousse.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eide, Kristin. 2006. Norwegian Modals. Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Epstein, Samuel. 1984. “Quantifier-pro and the LF Representation of PRO.” Linguistic Inquiry 15 (3): 499–505.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grinder, John. 1970. “Super Equi-NP Deletion.” Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 297–317. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago.
Harley, Heidi. 2011. “A Minimalist Approach to Argument Structure.” The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism ed. by Cedric Boeckx, 427–448. Oxford University Press: Oxford.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. “Movement and Control.” Linguistic Inquiry 30 (1): 69–96. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huot, Hélène. 1974. Le verbe devoir: étude synchronique et diachronique. Paris: Klincksieck.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray, and Peter Culicover. 2003. “The Semantic Basis of Control in English.” Language 79 (3): 517–556. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kajita, Masaru. 1967. A Generative-Transformational Study of Semi-Auxiliaries in Present-Day American English. Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Kayne, Richard. 1969. The Transformational Cycle in French. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Kayne, Richard. 1975. French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. “The Notional Category of Modality.” Words, Worlds, and Contexts. New Approaches in Word Semantics ed. by Hans-Jürgen Eikmeyer and Hannes Rieser, 38–74. Berlin: de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. “Modality.” Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research ed. by Arnim von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich, 639–650. Berlin: de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, Idan. 2000. Elements of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, Idan. 2004. “The Scale of Finiteness and the Calculus of Control.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22 (4): 811–877. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, Idan. 2013. Control in Generative Grammar: A Research Companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasnik, Howard. 1992. “Two Notes on Control and Binding.” Control and Grammar ed. by Richard Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri, and James Higginbotham, 235–251. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, Roger. 2001. “Null Case and the Distribution of PRO.” Linguistic Inquiry 32 (1): 141–166. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perlmutter, David. 1970. “The Two Verbs Begin.” Readings in English Transformational Grammar ed. by Roderick Jacobs and Peter Rosenbaum, 107–277. Waltham, Mass: Ginn and Company.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Postal, Paul. 1970. “On Coreferential Complement Subject Deletion.” Linguistic Inquiry 1 (4): 439–500.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reed, Lisa. 2014. Strengthening the PRO Hypothesis. Berlin: de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rooryck, Johan. 2000. Configurations of Sentential Complementation. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rooryck, Johan. 2007. “Control via Selection.” New Horizons in the Analysis of Raising and Control ed. by William Davies and Stanley Dubinsky, 281–292. Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ross, John. 1969. “Auxiliaries as Main Verbs.” Studies in Philosophical Linguistics Series I ed. by William Todd, 77–102. Evanston: Great Expectations Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruwet, Nicolas. 1972. Théorie syntaxique et syntaxe du français. Paris: Editions du Seuil.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Safir, Kenneth. 1985. Syntactic Chains. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sag, Ivan, and Carl Pollard. 1991. “An Integrated Theory of Complement Control.” Language 67 (1): 63–113. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, Edwin. 1985. “PRO and Subject of NP.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3 (3): 297–315. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, Edwin. 1992. “Adjunct Control.” Control and Grammar ed. by Richard Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri, and James Higginbotham, 297–322. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zimmermann, Michael and Georg Kaiser. 2014. “On Expletive Subject Pronoun Drop in Colloquial French.” Journal of French Language Studies 24 (1): 107–126. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1983. “On the Notion ‘Adjunct Subject’ and a Class of Raising Predicates.” MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 195–232.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Reed, Lisa A.
2019.
Further Implications of French Devoir and Falloir for Theories of Control and Modality. In
Contributions of Romance Languages to Current Linguistic Theory [
Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 95],
► pp. 65 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.