Some notes on falloir, devoir, and the theory of control
This article sheds new light on the structure and meaning of sentences containing the French modal verbs devoir and falloir, as well as on the syntax and semantics of Control generally. Well-known and previously unnoticed empirical facts are examined that support the author’s novel contention that falloir and devoir are syntactically and semantically ambiguous. These data are also argued to offer indirect support for the analysis of Control clauses recently developed in Reed (2014: Ch. 6 and 7), according to which there is a theoretical primitive (pro) and it is associated with a “minimal” feature bundle consisting of just [−expletive] and [+N] syntactic features, with a separate, post-syntactic Theory of Control determining its understood phi-features.
References (40)
Authier, J.-Marc and Lisa Reed
2009 “French Tough-Movement Revisited.” Probus 21 (1): 1–21.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bach, Emmon
1979 “Control in Montague Grammar.” Linguistic Inquiry 10 (4): 515–531.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barbiers, Sjef
1995 The Syntax of Interpretation. The Netherlands: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bošković, Željko
2007 “The Syntax of Nonfinite Complementation: An Economy Approach.” Minimalist Syntax: The Essential Readings ed. by
Željko Bošković and
Howard Lasnik, 86–111. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bowers, John
2002 “Transitivity.” Linguistic Inquiry 33 (2): 183–224.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik
1995 “The Theory of Principles and Parameters.” The Minimalist Program,
Noam Chomsky, 13–127. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culbertson, Jennifer and Géraldine Legendre
2014 “Prefixal Agreement and Impersonal il in Spoken French: Experimental Evidence.” Journal of French Language Studies 24 (1): 83–105.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dubois, Jean
1969 Grammaire structurale du français: La phrase et les transformations. Paris: Larousse.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eide, Kristin
2006 Norwegian Modals. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Epstein, Samuel
1984 “Quantifier-pro and the LF Representation of PRO.” Linguistic Inquiry 15 (3): 499–505.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grinder, John
1970 “Super Equi-NP Deletion.” Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 297–317. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago.
Harley, Heidi
2011 “A Minimalist Approach to Argument Structure.” The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism ed. by
Cedric Boeckx, 427–448. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hornstein, Norbert
1999 “Movement and Control.” Linguistic Inquiry 30 (1): 69–96.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huot, Hélène
1974 Le verbe devoir: étude synchronique et diachronique. Paris: Klincksieck.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray
1990 Semantic Structures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray, and Peter Culicover
2003 “The Semantic Basis of Control in English.” Language 79 (3): 517–556.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kajita, Masaru
1967 A Generative-Transformational Study of Semi-Auxiliaries in Present-Day American English. Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
Kayne, Richard
1969 The Transformational Cycle in French. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Kayne, Richard
1975 French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kratzer, Angelika
1981 “The Notional Category of Modality.” Words, Worlds, and Contexts. New Approaches in Word Semantics ed. by
Hans-Jürgen Eikmeyer and
Hannes Rieser, 38–74. Berlin: de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kratzer, Angelika
1991 “Modality.” Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research ed. by
Arnim von Stechow and
Dieter Wunderlich, 639–650. Berlin: de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, Idan
2000 Elements of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, Idan
2004 “The Scale of Finiteness and the Calculus of Control.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22 (4): 811–877.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, Idan
2013 Control in Generative Grammar: A Research Companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasnik, Howard
1992 “Two Notes on Control and Binding.”
Control and Grammar ed. by
Richard Larson,
Sabine Iatridou,
Utpal Lahiri, and
James Higginbotham, 235–251. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, Roger
2001 “Null Case and the Distribution of PRO.” Linguistic Inquiry 32 (1): 141–166.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perlmutter, David
1970 “The Two Verbs Begin.” Readings in English Transformational Grammar ed. by
Roderick Jacobs and
Peter Rosenbaum, 107–277. Waltham, Mass: Ginn and Company.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Postal, Paul
1970 “On Coreferential Complement Subject Deletion.” Linguistic Inquiry 1 (4): 439–500.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reed, Lisa
2014 Strengthening the PRO Hypothesis. Berlin: de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rooryck, Johan
2000 Configurations of Sentential Complementation. London: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rooryck, Johan
2007 “Control via Selection.” New Horizons in the Analysis of Raising and Control ed. by
William Davies and
Stanley Dubinsky, 281–292. Dordrecht: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ross, John
1969 “Auxiliaries as Main Verbs.” Studies in Philosophical Linguistics Series I ed. by
William Todd, 77–102. Evanston: Great Expectations Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruwet, Nicolas
1972 Théorie syntaxique et syntaxe du français. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Safir, Kenneth
1985 Syntactic Chains. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sag, Ivan, and Carl Pollard
1991 “An Integrated Theory of Complement Control.” Language 67 (1): 63–113.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, Edwin
1985 “PRO and Subject of NP.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3 (3): 297–315.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, Edwin
1992 “Adjunct Control.” Control and Grammar ed. by
Richard Larson,
Sabine Iatridou,
Utpal Lahiri, and
James Higginbotham, 297–322. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zimmermann, Michael and Georg Kaiser
2014 “On Expletive Subject Pronoun Drop in Colloquial French.” Journal of French Language Studies 24 (1): 107–126.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa
1983 “On the Notion ‘Adjunct Subject’ and a Class of Raising Predicates.” MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 195–232.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Reed, Lisa A.
2019.
Further Implications of French Devoir and Falloir for Theories of Control and Modality. In
Contributions of Romance Languages to Current Linguistic Theory [
Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 95],
► pp. 65 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.