Chapter in:
Instructed Second Language Acquisition Research Methods
Edited by Laura Gurzynski-Weiss and YouJin Kim
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 3] 2022
► pp. 328
References
Back, M.
(2020) Interlocutor differences and the role of social others in a Spanish peer tutoring context. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences (pp. 99–123). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, M., Adams, R., & Toth, P.
(2014) A comparison of L2-L2 and L2-HL interactions in Spanish language classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 98 (2), 497–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, A. C.
(2002) The effects of processing instruction on the acquisition of ser and estar . Hispania, 85 (2), 308–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M.
(2007) A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism Language and Cognition 10 (1), 7–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Costa, P., Li, W., & Rawal, H.
(2019) Qualitative classroom methods. In J. Schweiter & A. Benati (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp. 113–136). Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R.
(2003) Implicit and explicit learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Douglas Fir Group
(2016) A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. Modern Language Journal, 100 (Supplement 2016), 19–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S.
(2015) The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(1994) The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009) Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge, and instruction. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing, and teaching (pp. 3–25). Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R.
(2006) Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28 (2), 339–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H.
(Eds. 2009), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing, and teaching. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Wulff, S.
(2020) Usage-based approaches to L2 acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 63–85). Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Gass, S.
(2014) Interaction approaches. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition. Routledge.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A.
(2020) Input, interaction, and output in L2 acquisition. In B. VanPatten, G. D. Keating, & S. Wulff (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 192–222). Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K.
(2000) A new approach to the study of the SLA of copula choice. In R. Leow & C. Sanz (Eds.), Spanish applied linguistics at the turn of the millennium (pp. 50–66). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2003) A comparison of copula choice in advanced and native Spanish. Language Learning, 53 (4), 703–764. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K., & Long, A. Y.
(2015) The development and use of the Spanish copula with adjectives by Korean-speaking learners. In I. Pérez-Jiménez, M. Leonetti, & S. Gumiel-Molina (Eds.), New perspectives on the study of ser and estar (pp. 293–324). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L.
(Ed.) (2017) Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2020) Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Plonsky, L.
(2017) Look who’s interacting: A scoping review of research involving non-teacher/non-peer interlocutors. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach (pp. 306–324). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Mercer, S.
(Eds.) (2020) Student engagement in the language classroom. Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
IU Human Resource Protection Program
(2021a, January 19). HRPP Policy- Exempt Research. Indiana University Research. Retrieved on 2 June 2022 from https://​research​.iu​.edu​/policies​/human​-subjects​-irb​/exempt​-research​.html
(2021b, January 19). HRPP Policy- IRB Review Process. Indiana University Research. Retrieved on 2 June 2022 from https://​research​.iu​.edu​/policies​/human​-subjects​-irb​/irb​-review​-process​.html
Kagan, O., Carreira, M., & Chik, C.
(2017) The Routledge handbook of heritage language education: From innovation to program building. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, M., Loewen, S., & Trego, D.
(2020) Synchronous VCMC with TalkAbroad: Exploring noticing, transcription, and learner perceptions in Spanish foreign-language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y.
(2008) The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. Modern Language Journal, 92 (1), 114–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Task complexity, learning opportunities, and Korean EFL learners’ question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34 (4), 627–658. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., Choi, B., Yun, H., Kim, B., & Choi, S.
(in press). Task repetition, synchronous written corrective feedback, and the learning of Korean grammar: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research. Crossref
Lantolf, J. P.
(2020) I~ You> I~ Me. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences (pp. 79–97). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larson-Hall, J.
(2015) A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS and R. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P.
(2000) A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware versus unaware learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22 (4), 557–584. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) ISLA: How implicit or how explicit should it be? Theoretical, empirical, and pedagogical/curricular issues. Language Teaching Research, 23 (4), 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S.
(2020) Introduction to instructed second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S., Crowther, D., Isbell, D. R., Kim, K. M., Maloney, J., Miller, Z. F., & Rawal, H.
(2019) Mobile-assisted language learning: A Duolingo case study. ReCALL, 31 (3), 293–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S., Isbell, D. R., & Sporn, Z.
(2020) The effectiveness of app-based language instruction for developing receptive linguistic knowledge and oral communicative ability. Foreign Language Annals, 53 (2), 209–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H.
(1983) Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4 (2), 126–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. Y., & Geeslin, K. L.
(2020) Examining the role of instructor first language in classroom-based oral input. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences (pp. 127–157). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A.
(1999) Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21 (4), 557–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M.
(2022) Second language research: Methodology and design (3rd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E.
(2019) Second language learning theories. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nakatsukasa, K.
(2017) Gender and recasts. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors (pp. 100–119). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
(2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50 (3), 417–528. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payant, C. & Kim, Y.
(2019) Impact of task modality on collaborative dialogue among plurilingual learners: A classroom-based study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22 (5), 614–627. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L.
(Ed.) (2015) Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Brown, D.
(2015) Domain definition and search techniques in meta-analyses of L2 research (Or why 18 meta-analyses of feedback have different results). Second Language Research, 31 (2), 267–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., Eggbert, J., & LaFlair, G.
(2015) Bootstrapping in applied linguistics: Assessing its potential using shared data. Applied Linguistics, 36 (5), 591–610.Google Scholar
Ruben, J.
(1975) What the ‘good language learner’ can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9 , 41–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, J., & B. Lafford
(1992) Acquisition of lexical meaning in a study abroad environment: Ser and estar and the Granada experience. Hispania, 75 (3), 714–722. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Celce-Murcia, M.
(2020) An overview of applied linguistics. In N. Schmitt & M. P. H. Rodgers (Eds.), An introduction to applied linguistics (3rd ed.) (pp. 1–15). Routledge.Google Scholar
Serafini, E. J.
(2020) The impact of learner perceptions of interlocutor IDs on learner possible selves during a short-term experience abroad. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences (pp. 210–243). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Serafini, E. J., & Sanz, C.
(2016) Evidence for the decreasing impact of cognitive ability on second language development as proficiency increases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38 (4), 607–646. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shintani, N., Li, S., & Ellis, R.
(2013) Comprehension-based versus production-based instruction: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Language Learning, 63 (2), 296–329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sonbul, S., & Schmitt, N.
(2013) Explicit and implicit lexical knowledge: Acquisition of collocations under different input conditions. Language Learning, 63 (1), 121–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y.
(2010) Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60 (2), 263–308. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M.
(2005) The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 495–508). Routledge.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N.
(2015) Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48 (1), 1–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Toomer, M., & Elgort, I.
(2019) The development of implicit and explicit knowledge of collocations: A conceptual replication and extension of Sonbul and Schmitt (2013). Language Learning, 69 (2), 405–439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Valdés, G.
(2000) Introduction. In L. Sandstedt (Ed.), Spanish for native speakers. Harcourt College.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B.
(1987) Classroom learners’ acquisition of ser and estar: Accounting for developmental patterns. In B. VanPatten, T. Dvorak, & J. F. Lee (Eds.), Foreign language learning: A research perspective (pp. 61–75). Newbury House.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Benati, A. G.
(2010) Key terms in second language acquisition. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Williams, J.
(2015) Introduction: The nature of theories. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 1–16). Routledge.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., Williams, J., Keating, G. D., & Wulff, S.
(2020) Introduction: The nature of theories. In B. VanPatten, G. D. Keating, & S. Wulff (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 1–18). Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. N.
(2004) Implicit learning of form-meaning connections. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 203–218). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2005) Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27 (2), 269–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, N., & Smith, G.
(2017) Teachers’ provision of feedback in L2 text-chat. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors (pp. 255–279). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar