Cover not available
Part of
Methods in Study Abroad Research: Past, present, and future
Edited by Carmen Pérez-Vidal and Cristina Sanz
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 4] 2023
► pp. 183–207

Chapter 8
Oral fluency measures in study abroad research

 | University of Barcelona
 | University of Barcelona
 | University of Barcelona
Measuring L2 speaking fluency is methodologically challenging. The current chapter critically evaluates measures of L2 speaking fluency and their limitations in study abroad (SA) research and offers new methodological directions based on current findings from L2 fluency research. The analysis of current methods in SA suggests researchers should move beyond the analysis of utterance and perceived fluency to include cognitive fluency in the assessment of oral development to gain a better understanding and a more comprehensive picture of SA effects on language development. In addition, we propose several methodological strategies that aim at improving the sensitivity and reliability of fluency measures in capturing the impact of SA on fluency development. Specifically, we highlight the need for expanding the range of elicitation methods to include dialogic speech, we recommend the use of L2-specific measures to control for learner variability in L1 speaking fluency, and we suggest the impact of socio-psychological and cognitive individual differences on L2 fluency development in study abroad be thoroughly investigated.
Keywords: L1 speaking fluency, L2 speaking fluency, oral fluency, cognitive fluency, speech processing, speech elicitation instruments, speech elicitation techniques, utterance fluency, perceived fluency, speaking fluency measures
Article outline
  • Introduction
    • What is speaking fluency, and how does it enhance our understanding of L2 acquisition?
    • How does speech production differ in L2 and L1? In what ways is L2 speaking fluency different from L1 speaking fluency?
  • Measures of L2 speaking fluency in SA research
    • Elicitation techniques
    • Utterance fluency
    • Speed fluency
    • Breakdown fluency
    • Repair fluency
    • Perceived fluency
    • Cognitive fluency
  • Limitations and gaps
    • Elicitation techniques
    • Controlling for L1 speaking fluency
    • Controlling for individual differences
  • Strategies and guiding principles
  • Research ethics considerations
  • Conclusions
  • References
Published online: 3 February 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.4.08mor
References (101)
References
Bergeron, A., & Trofimovich, P. (2017). Linguistic dimensions of accentedness and comprehensibility: Exploring task and listener effects in second language French. Foreign Language Annals, 50(3), 547–546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosker, H. R., Pinget, A. F., Quené, H., Sanders, T., & de Jong, N. H. (2013). What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing, 30(2), 159–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chambers, F. (1997). What do we mean by fluency? System, 25(4), 535–544. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Ivanova, I. (2006). How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and language-specific selection mechanisms are both functional. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5), 1057–1074. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., & Saito, K. (2015). Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility? The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 80–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Saito, K., & Isaacs, T. (2017). Linguistic dimensions of L2 accentedness and comprehensibility vary across speaking tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 443–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt’s ‘speaking’ model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
de Jong, N. H. (2016). Predicting pauses in L1 and L2 speech: The effects of utterance boundaries and word frequency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 113–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Fluency in second language testing: Insights from different disciplines. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(3), 237–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Jong, N. H. & Bosker, H. R. (2013). Choosing a threshold for silent pauses to measure second language fluency. In R. Eklund (Ed.) Proceedings of disfluency in spontaneous speech: Diss 2013I (17–20). Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology (KTH).Google Scholar
de Jong, N. H., & Mora, J. C. (2019). Does having good articulatory skills lead to more fluent speech in first and second languages? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(1), 227–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Jong, N. H., Steinel, M. P., Florijn, A., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2013). Linguistic skills and speaking fluency in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(5), 893–916. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Jong, N. H., Grouenhout, R., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. (2015). Second language fluency: Speaking style or proficiency? Correcting measures of second language fluency for first language behavior. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 223–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T., Munro, M. J., Thomson, R. I., & Rossiter, M. J. (2009). The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(4), 533–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2004). Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54(4), 655–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewey, D. P., Bown, J., & Eggett, D. (2012). Japanese language proficiency, social networking, and language use during study abroad: Learners’ perspectives. Canadian Modern Language Review, 68(2), 111–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewey, D. P., Bown, J., Baker, W., Martinsen, R. A., Gold, C., & Eggett, D. (2014). Language use in six study abroad programs: An exploratory analysis of possible predictors. Language Learning, 64(1), 36–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Silvio, F., Diao, W., & Donovan, A. (2016). The development of L2 fluency during study abroad: A cross-language study. The Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 610–624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du, H. (2013). The development of Chinese fluency during study abroad in China. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 131–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freed, B. F. (2000). Is fluency, like beauty, in the eyes (and ears) of the beholder? In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 243–265). University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Freed, B. F., Dewey, D. P., Segalowitz, N., & Halter, R. (2004). The language contact profile. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 349–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freed, B. F., Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, D. P. (2004). Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 275–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
French, L. M., & O’Brien, I. (2008). Phonological memory and children’s second language grammar learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(3), 463–487. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García-Amaya, L. (2012). Second language fluency and cognition: The study of Spanish second language development in an overseas immersion program and an at-home foreign language classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University.
(2017). Detailing L1 and L2 use in study-abroad research: Data from the daily linguistic questionnaire. System, 71, 60–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Utterance fluency in the study-abroad context. In C. Sanz & A. Morales-Front (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of study abroad research and practice (pp. 181–192). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). A change of setting: Measuring language use in an overseas immersion context. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education, 6(1), 32–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grey, S., Cox, J. G., Serafini, E. J., & Sanz, C. (2015). The role of individual differences in the study abroad context: cognitive capacity and language development during short-term intensive language exposure. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 137–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (Eds.). (2012). Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huensch, A., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2017a). Understanding second language fluency behavior: The effects of individual differences in first language fluency, cross-linguistic differences, and proficiency over time. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(4), 755–785. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017b). L2 utterance fluency development before, during, and after residence abroad: A multidimensional investigation. The Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 275–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hummel, K. M., & French, L. M. (2010). Phonological memory and implications for the second language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(3), 371–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P. (2012). Deconstructing comprehensibility: Identifying the linguistic influences on listeners’ L2 comprehensibility ratings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 475–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Isabelli-García, C., Bown, J., Plews, J. L., & Dewey, D. P. (2018). Language learning and study abroad. Language Teaching, 51(4), 439–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahng, J. (2014). Exploring utterance and cognitive fluency of L1 and L2 English speakers: Temporal measures and stimulated recall. Language Learning, 64(4), 809–854. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). The effect of pause location on perceived fluency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(3), 569–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Explaining second language utterance fluency: Contribution of cognitive fluency and first language utterance fluency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41(2), 457–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keppie, C., Lindberg, R., & Thomason, S. (2016). The benefits of study abroad on the fluency of learners of French as a second language. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique Appliquée, 19(2), 44–63.Google Scholar
Kim, J., Dewey, D. P., Baker-Smemoe, W., Ring, S., Westover, A., & Eggett, D. L. (2015). L2 development during study abroad in China. System, 55, 123–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J. (1999). Monitoring and self-repair in L2. Language Learning, 49(2), 303–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2013). New conceptualizations of language aptitude in second language attainment. In G. Granena & M. H. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 131–152). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000a). The timing of self-repairs in second language speech production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 145–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000b). The role of attention in monitoring second language speech production. Language Learning, 50(2), 343–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J., & Dénes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32(2), 145–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J., & Sáfár, A. (2008). Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism, 11(2), 261–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lennon, P. (2000). The lexical element in spoken second language fluency. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 25–42). University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42(3), 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999). Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llanes, À., & Muñoz, C. (2009). A short stay abroad: Does it make a difference? System, 37(3), 353–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Age effects in a study abroad context: Children and adults studying abroad and at home. Language Learning, 63(1), 63–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bahtia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). In defense of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 5–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, A., & Mora, J. C. (2017). Processing time and comprehensibility judgments in non-native listeners’ perception of L2 speech. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 3(2), 167–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181–209). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Adams, R., Stafford, C., & Winke, P. (2010). Exploring the relationship between modified output and working memory capacity. Language Learning, 60(3), 501–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marijuan, S., & Sanz, C. (2018). Expanding boundaries: Current and new directions in study abroad research and practice. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 185–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C. (2012). The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 379–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mora, J. C. (2022). Aptitude and individual differences. In T. M. Derwing, M. J. Munro, & R. I. Thomson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and speaking (pp. 68–82). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mora, J. C., & Valls-Ferrer, M. (2012). Oral fluency, accuracy, and complexity in formal instruction and study abroad learning contexts. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 610–641. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1994). Evaluations of foreign accent in extemporaneous and read material. Language Testing, 11(3), 253–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995). Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, 38(3), 289–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Freed, B. F., & Collentine, J. (2007). Phonological memory predicts second language oral fluency gains in adults. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(4), 557–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Collentine, J., & Freed, B. F. (2006). Phonological memory and lexical, narrative, and grammatical skills in second language oral production by adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(3), 377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (2000). The one-clause-at-a-time hypothesis. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 163–199). University of Michigan Press. [URL]
Préfontaine, Y., & Kormos, J. (2016). A qualitative analysis of perceptions of fluency in second language French. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 151–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ranta, L., & Lyster, R. (2007). A cognitive approach to improving immersion students’ oral language abilities: The awareness-practice-feedback sequence. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 141–160). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R. (2007). Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(3), 161–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., Ilkan, M., Magne, V., Tran, M. N., & Suzuki, S. (2018). Acoustic characteristics and learner profiles of low-, mid- and high-level second language fluency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(3), 593–617. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2016). Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(2), 217–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Using listener judgements to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics, 38(4), 439–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., Webb, S., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2016). Lexical correlates of comprehensibility versus accentedness in second language speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(3), 597–609. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Second language fluency and its underlying cognitive and social determinants. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 79–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. F. (2004). Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 173–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Frenkiel-Fishman, S. (2005). Attention control and ability level in a complex cognitive skill: Attention shifting and second-language proficiency. Memory & Cognition, 33(4), 644–653. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Hulstijn, J. (2005). Automaticity in bilingualism and second language learning. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 371–388). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Serrano, R., Llanes, À., & Tragant, E. (2011). Analyzing the effect of context of second language learning: Domestic intensive and semi-intensive courses vs. study abroad in Europe. System, 39(2), 133–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serrano, R., Tragant, E., & Llanes, À. (2012). A longitudinal analysis of the effects of one year abroad. Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes, 68(2), 138–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Second language task-based performance: Theory, research, assessment. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183–205). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, S., & Kormos, J. (2020). Linguistic dimensions of comprehensibility and perceived fluency: An investigation of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language argumentative speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 143–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, S., Kormos, J., & Uchihara, T. (2021). The relationship between utterance and perceived fluency: A meta-analysis of correlational studies. The Modern Language Journal, 105(2), 435–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taube-Schiff, M., & Segalowitz, N. (2005). Linguistic attention control: Attention shifting governed by grammaticized elements of language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 508–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P. (2016). Fluency in monologic and dialogic task performance: Challenges in defining and measuring L2 fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 133–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). L2 development in an intensive study abroad EAP context. System, 72, 62–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2011). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58(2), 37–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–273). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Wright, C. (2020). Second language speech fluency: From research to practice. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Towell, R. (2002). Relative degrees of fluency: A comparative case study of advanced learners of French. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 40(2), 117–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2012). Disentangling accent from comprehensibility. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 905–916. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tullock, B., & Ortega, L. (2017). Fluency and multilingualism in study abroad: Lessons from a scoping review. System, 71, 7–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, C., & Tavakoli, P. (2016). New directions and developments in defining, analyzing and measuring L2 speech fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 73–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kim, Kyungmin, Jang Ho Lee & Hansol Lee
2024. Systematic review synthesising the effects of study abroad experience on the development of language fluency. Oxford Review of Education ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.