References (21)
References
Bigelow, M. H. (2014). Blending social and cognitive research traditions in language learning and teaching: A matter of mentoring and modeling. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 402–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H. (2013). Notes from the editor. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 825–827. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Fina, A., & Perrino, S. (2011). [Special Issue]. Language in Society, 40(1), 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(Suppl. 2016), 19–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (2007). Second/foreign language learning as a social accomplishment: Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 800–819. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gao, X. (2019). The Douglas Fir Group framework as a resource map for language teacher education. The Modern Language Journal, 103(Suppl. 2019), 161–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hadley, G. (2017). Grounded theory in applied linguistics research: A practical guide. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Grounded theory method. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 264–275). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. L., & Murakami, A. (2023). Methodological innovations in studying complex systems in applied linguistics. In S. Li & M. T. Prior (Convenors), Methodological innovation in applied linguistics research: Perspectives, strategies, and trends. Invited Colloquium. AAAL, Portland, Oregon. Retrieved on 20 July 2023 from [URL]
Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (2003). Multimodal literacy. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
King, K., & Mackey, A. (2016). Research methodology in second language studies: Trends, concerns, and new directions. The Modern Language Journal, 100(Suppl. 2016), 209–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.Google Scholar
Li, S., & Prior, M. P. (2023, March 18–23). Methodological innovation in applied linguistics research: Perspectives, strategies, and trends. Invited Colloquium. AAAL, Portland, Oregon. Retrieved on 20 July 2023 from [URL]
Markee, N. (2011). Doing, and justifying doing, avoidance. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 602–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. (2013). SLA for the 21st century: Disciplinary progress, transdisciplinary relevance, and the bi/multilingual turn. Language Learning, 63(Suppl. 1), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrino, S. (2015). Chronotopes: Time and Space in Oral Narrative. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The Handbook of Narrative Analysis (pp. 140–159). Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrino, S., & Kohler, G. (2020). Chronotopic Identities: Narrating Made in Italy across Spatiotemporal Scales. Language & Communication, 70, 94–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. (2017). Quantitative research methods. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 505–521). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serafini, F. (2014). Reading the visual: An introduction to teaching multimodality literacy. Teaching College Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1998). Improvisational performance of culture in realtime discursive practice. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Creativity in Performance (pp. 265–312). Ablex Publishing Corp.Google Scholar