Cover not available
Part of
Less Frequently Used Research Methodologies in Applied Linguistics
Edited by A. Mehdi Riazi
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 6] 2024
► pp. 83–110

Chapter 6
Conversation analysis

| University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
This chapter introduces conversation analysis to researchers who are not familiar with this methodology for analyzing naturalistic language use and how it has been applied to develop behavioral alternatives to cognitive approaches to second language acquisition. Specifically, I: (1) review what CA is; (2) discuss typical research questions in CA and how these questions are generated; (3) outline how CA data are gathered, transcribed and analyzed; (4) review turn-taking, repair, sequence, and preference organization; (5) discuss ethical issues in CA; (6) outline important critiques of CA and how CA researchers have rebutted these criticisms; and (7) summarize the arguments presented in this chapter with a view to promoting a constructive, critical dialog between cognitive and socially-oriented SLA researchers.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The ontological and epistemological foundations of ethnomethodology and CA
    • 2.1Ethnomethodology
    • 2.2Conversation analysis (CA)
      • 2.2.1Context in CA
  • 3.An overview of how conversation analysts set about doing emic research
    • 3.1What types of research questions do conversation analysts address, and how do we generate them?
    • 3.2Procedures of data collection, transcription, and analysis
  • 4.The formal structure of talk: Turn-taking, repair, sequence, and preference organizations
    • 4.1Turn-taking
    • 4.2Repair
    • 4.3Sequence organization
    • 4.4Preference
  • 5.Transcription conventions: From words to multimodality and materiality
    • 5.1Jeffersonian transcription conventions
    • 5.2Multimodal transcription
      • 5.2.1Analysis
  • 6.Critiques and responses
    • 6.1Moerman’s contextual critique of conversation analysis
    • 6.2The epistemics debate
    • 6.3The Schegloff/Wetherell/Billig debates
  • 7.Ethical issues
  • 8.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD
. The theory of distributed cognition. Content last reviewed August 2022 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Retrieved on 21 July 2023 from [URL]
Billig, M.
(1987) Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1999a) Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse & Society, 10, 543–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999b) Conversation Analysis and the claims of naivety. Discourse & Society, 10, 572–576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, P., & Heritage, J.
(1992) Talk at work. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S.
(2005) How the body shapes the mind. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H.
(1952) The perception of the other: A study in social order. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
(1984) Studies in ethnomethodology. Polity Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H.
(1986) On formal structures of practical actions. In H. Garfinkel (Ed.), Ethnomethodological studies of work (pp. 160–193). Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1967) Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face interaction. Doubleday.Google Scholar
(1981) Footing. In E. Goffman (Ed.), Forms of talk (pp. 124–159). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). Irvington.Google Scholar
(1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995) Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 233–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Practices of color classification. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 1–2, 19–36.Google Scholar
(2013) The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 8–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Co-operative action. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C., & Duranti, A.
(1992) Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 1–42). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C., & Salomon, R.
(2019) Not being bound by what you can see now: Charles Goodwin in conversation with René Salomon. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(2), Art. 11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J.
(1989) Current developments in CA. In D. Roger & P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation (pp. 21–47). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(1999) Conversation analysis at century’s end: Practices of talk-in-interaction, their distributions, and their outcomes. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 69–76.Google Scholar
(2013) Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds. Discourse Studies, 15, 551–578.Google Scholar
(2018) Epistemics, CA, and ‘post-analytic’ ethnomethodology: A rebuttal. Discourse Studies, 20, 14–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J., & Raymond, S.
(2005) The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-nteraction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 15–38.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Sefi, S.
(1992) Dilemmas of advice: aspects of the delivery and reception of advice between health visitors and first-time mothers. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 359–417). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E.
(1969) Formal and transcendental logic (D. Cairns, Trans.). Martinus Nijhoff. (Original work published in 1929). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1983) Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. First book: General introduction to a pure phenomenology (F. Kersten, Trans.). Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
(1989) Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. In Second book: Studies on the phenomenology of constitution (R. Rojcevicz & A. Schuwer, Trans.). Kluwer. (Original work published in 1952).Google Scholar
(2001) Logical investigation (Vol. 2). Routledge. (Original work published in 1900–1901).Google Scholar
Hutchins, E.
(1995) Cognition in the wild. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G.
(2004) Glossary of transcription conventions with an introduction. In P. J. Glenn, C. D. LeBaron, & J. Mandelbaum (Eds.), Studies in language and social interaction (pp. 221–240). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Wagner, J.
(2011) A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 117–142). Routledge.Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. H.
(2017) Experimental and laboratory approaches to conversation analysis: Using conversation analysis in the lab. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50, 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, K. H., & Torreira, F.
(2015) The timing and construction of preference: A quantitative study. Discourse Processes, 52, 255–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kronman, M. P., Gerber, J. S., Grundmeier, R. W., Zhou, C., Robinson, J. D., Heritage, J., Stout, J., Burges, D., Hedrick, B., Warren, L., Shalowitz, M., Shone, L. P., Steffes, J., Wright, M., Fiks, A. G., & Mangione-Smith, R.
(2020) Reducing antibiotic prescribing in primary care for respiratory illness. Pediatrics, 146(3), e20200038. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, G.
(2004) Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H.
(2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Long, M. H., & Doughty, C. J.
(2003) SLA and cognitive science. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 866–870). Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M., & Wong, J.
(2016) Reverting to a hidden interactional order: Epistemics, informationism, and CA. Discourse Studies, 18, 526–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majlesi, A. R., & Markee, N.
(2018) Multimodality in second language talk: The impact of video analysis on second language acquisition studies research. In D. Favareau (Ed.), Co-operative engagements in intertwined Semiosis: Essays in honour of Charles Goodwin (247–260). University of Tartu Press.Google Scholar
Markee, N.
(1997) Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Emic and etic in qualitative research. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–4). Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Where does research on classroom discourse and interaction go from here? In N. Markee (Ed.), The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp. 509–526). Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) Some theoretical reflections on the construct of interactional competence. In M. R. Salaberry & S. Kunitz (Eds.), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence: Bridging theory and practice (pp. 60–76). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markee, N., & Kasper, G.
(2004) Classroom talks: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 88, 491–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, D.
(2003) Bad news, good news: Conversational order in everyday talk and clinical settings. The Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Mehan, H.
(1979) Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moerman, M.
(1988) Talking culture: Ethnography and CA. University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L.
(2013) The conversation analytic approach to data collection. In Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp.32–56). Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2016) Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20, 2–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021) Sensing in social interaction. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevile, M.
(2015) The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48, 121–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevile, M., Haddington, P., Heinemann, T., & Rauniomaa, M.
(Eds.) (2015) Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Parsons, T.
(1937) The structure of social action. McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J.
(1993) Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9–34). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A.
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds), Structures of social action: Studies in CA (pp. 152–163). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Using participants’ video stimulated comments to complement analyses of interactional practices. In H. Te Molder & J. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 93–113). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J.
(2013) Preference. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of CA (pp. 211–228). Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Prabhu, N. S.
(1987) Second language pedagogy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1984) Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in CA, (pp. 21–27). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
(1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075–1095. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1979) The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics (pp. 261–286). Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1987a) Between macro and micro: Contexts and other connections. In J. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Munch, & N. Smelser (Eds.), The micro–macro link (pp. 207–234). University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1987b) Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in CA. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 101–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) CA and socially shared cognition. In L. R. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Socially shared cognition (pp. 150–171). American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
(1991) Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine and Stephanie D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition, (pp. 150–171). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
(1993) Reflections on quantification. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 99–128.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
(1997) Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and Society 8, 165–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
(1998) Reply to Wetherell. Discourse & Society, 9, 457–460.Google Scholar
(1999a) Schegloff’s Texts’ as Billig’s Data: A Critical Reply. Discourse & Society, 10, 558–572.Google Scholar
(1999b) Naivete vs sophistication or discipline vs self-indulgence: A rejoinder to Billig. Discourse Society, 10, 577–582.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
(2006a) Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality (pp. 70–96). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006b) On possibles. Discourse Studies 8, 141–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Sequence organization in conversation. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H.
(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schütz, A.
(1967) The phenomenology of the social world. Northwestern University Press. (Original published in 1932).Google Scholar
(1973) Collected papers I. The problem of social reality. Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
(1975) Collected papers III. Studies in phenomenological philosophy. Martinus Nijhoff. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A.
(2006) Introduction: Discourse, interaction and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8, 5–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H.
(2015) Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In V. Burr (Ed.), Gender and psychology (pp. 59–75). Routledge.Google Scholar
Whetherell, M.
(1998) Positioning and interpretative repertoires: CA and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9, 387–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar