Cover not available
Part of
Less Frequently Used Research Methodologies in Applied Linguistics
Edited by A. Mehdi Riazi
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 6] 2024
► pp. 224–245

Chapter 14
Repertory grids

| Osaka Ohtani University
Repertory Grid Technique (RGT) derives from Personal Construct Psychology. The technique aims to understand how participants view objects, events, or people chosen as a kind of thematic sample by comparing them against each other, revealing the participant’s constructs. After introducing the “fundamental postulate” and corollaries developed by its founder, George Kelly, the chapter explores how this technique may be applied in the field of SLA or language education. After discussing how this highly adaptable technique has been used, the chapter shows how researchers can gain qualitative and quantitative data on research questions relating to change over time or how different members of a group perceive a phenomenon. Although this technique presents some challenges for generalization, the chapter concludes by showing how data may be analyzed and used productively.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical foundations
  • 3.Methodological orientation
    • 3.1Principles and affordances
    • 3.2Types of RQs addressed by repertory grid
    • 3.3Procedures of data collection and analysis
    • 3.4Ethical issues
  • 4.Critiques and responses
  • 5.Conclusions
  • References
Published online: 5 January 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.6.14gro
References (51)
References
Bannister, D., & Fransella, F. (2021). Inquiring man: The psychology of personal constructs (3rd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Bazeley, P. (2018). Integrating analyses in mixed methods research. Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bezzi, A. (1999). What is this thing called geoscience? Epistemological dimensions elicited with the Repertory Grid and their implications for scientific literacy. Science Education, 83(6), 675–700. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Block, D. (1997). Learning by listening to language learners. System, 25(3), 347–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloxham, S., Hudson, J., den Outer, B., & Price, M. (2015). External peer review of assessment: An effective approach to verifying standards? Higher Education Research & Development, 34(6), 1069–1082. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blundell, J., Wittkowski, A., Wieck, A., & Hare, D. J. (2012). Using the repertory grid technique to examine nursing staff’s construal of mothers with mental health problems: MBU staff’s construal of mothers with mental health problems. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 19, 260–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borg, S. (2015). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Boye, S., Gardiner, I. A., & Littlejohn, A. (2021). ‘Makes head hurt’: School-aged learners’ perceptions in the language classroom. System, 100, 102560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brophy, S. (2015). Humanizing healthcare. In D. A. Winter & N. Reed (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of personal construct psychology (pp. 293–305). John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, T. W., & Warren, B. (2015). Personal construct theory and philosophy. In D. A. Winter & N. Reed (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of personal construct psychology (pp. 9–23). John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (2nd ed.). Sage.Google Scholar
Denicolo, P., Long, T., & Bradley-Cole, K. (2016). Constructivist approaches and research methods: A practical guide to exploring personal meanings. Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donaghue, H. (2003). An instrument to elicit teachers’ beliefs and assumptions. ELT Journal, 57(4), 344–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Easterby-Smith, M. (1980). The design, analysis and interpretation of repertory grids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 13(1), 3–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fassin, Y., Werner, A., Van Rossem, A., Signori, S., Garriga, E., von Weltzien Hoivik, H., & Schlierer, H.-J. (2015). CSR and related terms in SME owner–managers’ mental models in six European countries: National context matters. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 433–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetters, M. D. (2019). The mixed methods research workbook: Activities for designing, implementing, and publishing projects. Sage.Google Scholar
Fransella, F., Bell, R., & Bannister, D. (2003). A manual for Repertory Grid technique (2nd ed.). Wiley.Google Scholar
Fransella, F. (2005). Some skills and tools for personal construct users. In F. Fransella (Ed.), The essential practitioner’s handbook of personal construct psychology, (pp. 41–56). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
(2015). What is a personal construct. In D. A. Winter & N. Reed (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of personal construct psychology (pp. 1–8). Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, I. A., Littlejohn, A., & Boye, S. (2021). Researching learners’ perceptions: The use of the repertory grid technique. Language Teaching Research, 136216882110136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hadley, G. (2017). Grounded theory in applied linguistics research: A practical guide. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hadley, G., & Charles, M. (2017). Enhancing extensive reading with data-driven learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(3), 131–152.Google Scholar
Hanks, J. (2017). Integrating research and pedagogy: An exploratory practice approach. System, 68, 38–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heckmann, M. (2016). OpenRepGrid: An R package for the analysis of repertory grids. R Package Version 0.1.10. [URL]
Jankowicz, D. (2004). The easy guide to repertory grids. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2019). Sociality and negotiation in the research grid interview. Personal Construct Theory and Practice, 16, 94–99. [URL]
Johnson, M., & Nádas, R. (2012). A review of the uses of the Kelly’s repertory grid method in educational assessment and comparability research studies. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(5), 425–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelly, G. (1955). A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. W. W Norton & Company.Google Scholar
(1991). The psychology of personal constructs, Volume One: Theory and personality. Routledge.Google Scholar
Kerr, G., & Kelly, L. (2019). Travel insurance: The attributes, consequences, and values of using travel insurance as a risk-reduction strategy. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 36(2), 191–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korthagen, F. A. J. (1992). Techniques for stimulating reflection in teacher education seminars. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(3), 265–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotsi, F., & Pike, S. (2021). Destination brand positioning theme development based on consumers’ personal values. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 45(3), 573–587. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. J. (1983). Culture and constructs: Communicating attitudes and values in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 16(6), 437–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.Google Scholar
Lemke, F., Clark, M., & Wilson, H. (2011). Customer experience quality: An exploration in business and consumer contexts using repertory grid technique. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(6), 846–869. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. S. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mann, S., & Walsh, S. (2017). Reflective practice in English language teaching: Research-based principles and practices. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. (3rd ed.). Sage.Google Scholar
Neuendorf, K. A. (2016). The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed.). Sage.Google Scholar
Oscarson, M., & Apelgren, B. M. (2011). Mapping language teachers’ conceptions of student assessment procedures in relation to grading: A two-stage empirical inquiry. System, 39(1), 2–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pope, M. L., & Denicolo, P. (1993). The art and science of constructivist research in teacher thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(5–6), 529–544. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pope, M. L., & Keen, T. R. (1981). Personal construct psychology and education. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Richter, K. G., & Lara Herrera, R. (2017). Characteristics and pedagogical behaviours of good EFL instructors: The views of selected Southeast Asian and Mexican SLTE students. RELC Journal, 48(2), 180–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sendan, F., & Roberts, J. (1998). Orhan: A case study in the development of a student teacher’s personal theories. Teachers and Teaching, 4(2), 229–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaw, M. L. G., & McKnight, C. (1981). Think again: Personal problem-solving and decision-making. Prentice Hall Direct.Google Scholar
Tan, F. B., & Hunter, M. G. (2002). The repertory grid technique: A method for the study of cognition in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 26(1), 39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tashakkori, A. M., Johnson, R. B., & Teddlie, C. B. (2020). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Sage.Google Scholar
Walker, B. M., & Crittenden, N. (2011). The use of laddering: Techniques, applications and problems. In P. Caputi, L. L. Viney, B. M. Walker, & N. Crittenden (Eds.), Personal Construct Methodology (pp. 69–87). John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
WebGrid Plus. (2020). [URL]
Yıldırım, R., & İspinar Akcayoglu, D. (2019). A study of young gifted learners’ and their teachers’ perceptions of effective EFL learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 42(1), 85–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar