Cover not available
Part of
Ethical Issues in Applied Linguistics Scholarship
Edited by Peter I. De Costa, Amr Rabie-Ahmed and Carlo Cinaglia
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 7] 2024
► pp. 28–44

Chapter 2
Corpus linguistics and ethics

 | Lancaster University
 | Lancaster University
In this chapter, we explore the ethical considerations attending to research and practice in corpus linguistics. Despite the ubiquity of ethical dilemmas in corpus construction and use, there has been scant literature dedicated to ethical practices within the discipline. This gap is particularly pronounced given the increasing engagement with digital and online data sources, which pose unique ethical challenges regarding issues such as consent, privacy, and the public-private dichotomy. The chapter addresses these ethical considerations, and more besides, from the inter-related perspectives of research participants, corpus builders, distributors, and users. Importantly, the chapter highlights how ethical considerations are not confined to discrete stages of corpus linguistic projects but, rather, are interwoven throughout the research lifecycle. Key issues addressed include informed consent, participant anonymity, the ethical implications of using publicly available versus private communications, and the responsibilities of corpus users to ensure the meaningful, truthful, and fair representation of their findings. The chapter aims to respond to the need for more nuanced ethical guidelines that reflect the diversity of data sources and research contexts that characterise contemporary corpus linguistics, advocating for a reflective, case-by-case approach to ethical decision-making.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Ethical considerations in corpus linguistics
    • Research participants
    • Corpus builders
    • Corpus distributors
    • Corpus users
  • Conclusions
  • References
Published online: 21 November 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.7.02bro
References (38)
References
Baker, P., Hardie, A., McEnery, A., Xiao, R., Bontcheva, K., Cunningham, H., Gaizauskas, R., Hamza, O., Maynard, D., Tablan, V., Ursu, C., Jayaram, B. D., & Leisher, M. (2004). Corpus linguistics and South Asian languages: Corpus creation and tool development. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 19(4), 509–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, P., & Brookes, G. (2021). Lovely nurses, rude receptionists, and patronising doctors: Determining the impact of gender stereotyping on patient feedback. In J. Angouri & J. Baxter (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language, gender and sexuality (pp. 559–571). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, P., Brookes, G., & Evans, C. (2019). The language of patient feedback: A corpus linguistic study of online health communication. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Reppen, R. (2015). The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, V. (2018). Statistics in corpus linguistics. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, V., Hawtin, A., & McEnery, T. (2021). The Written British National Corpus 2014 — design and comparability. Text and Talk, 41(5–6), 595–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brookes, G. (2018). Insulin restriction, medicalisation and the Internet: A corpus-assisted study of diabulimia discourse in online support groups. Communication & Medicine, 15(1), 14–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brookes, G., & McEnery, T. (2020). Corpus linguistics. In S. Adolphs & D. Knight (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English language and digital humanities (pp. 378–404). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Building a written corpus: What are the basics? In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 35–47). Routledge.Google Scholar
Collins, L. (2019). Corpus linguistics for computer-mediated communication. Routledge.Google Scholar
De Costa, P. (2016). Ethics in applied linguistics. Routledge.Google Scholar
De Costa, P.I. (2018). Toward greater diversity and social equality in language education research. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 15(4), 302–307.Google Scholar
Elgesem, D. (2015). Consent and information — Ethical considerations when conducting research on social media. In H. Fossheim & H. Ingierd (Eds.), Internet research ethics (pp. 15–34). Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing.Google Scholar
Eysenbach, G., & Till, J. E. (2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. British Medical Journal, 323, 1103–1105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frankel, M. S., & Siang, S. (1999). Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research on the internet: A report of an AAAS workshop. American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
Giaxoglou, K. (2017). Reflections on internet research ethics from language-focused research on web-based mourning: Revisiting the private/public distinction as a language ideology of differentiation. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(2–3), 229–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S. (2022). Corpora in applied linguistics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunt, D., & Brookes, G. (2020). Corpus, discourse and mental health. Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Isbell, D. R., Brown, D., Chen, M., Derrick, D. J., Ghanem, R., Arvizu, M. N. G., Schnur, E., Zhang, M., & Plonsky, L. (2022). Misconduct and questionable research practices: The ethics of quantitative data handling and reporting in applied linguistics. The Modern Language Journal, 106, 172–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, L., Chałupnik, M., Mackenzie, J., & Mullany, L. (2022). ‘STFU and start listening to how scared we are’: Resisting misogyny on Twitter via #NotAllMen. Discourse, Context & Media, 47, 100596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knight, D., & Adolphs, S. (2021). Building a spoken corpus: What are the basics? In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 21–34). Routledge.Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1992). Corpora and theories of linguistic performance. In J. Svartvik (Ed.), Directions in corpus linguistics (pp. 105–122). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). The spoken BNC 2014. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 319–344.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. (2017). Identifying informational norms in Mumsnet Talk: A reflexive-linguistic approach to internet research ethics. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(2–3), 293–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., & Brookes, G. (2024). Corpus linguistics and the social sciences. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, T., & Wilson, A. (2001). Corpus linguistics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). E-Research: Ethics, security, design, and control in psychological research on the internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 161–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, A. and McCarthy, M. (Eds.) (2021). The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics (2nd edition). Routledge.Google Scholar
Page, R., Barton, D., Unger, J., & Zappavigna, M. (2014). Researching language and social media: A student guide. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns and meanings in discourse: Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pimple, K. D. (2002). Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8, 191–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rüdiger, S., & Dayter, D. (2017). The ethics of researching unlikeable subjects: Language in an online community. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(2–3), 251–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sterling, S., & De Costa, P. I. (2018). Ethical applied linguistics research. In A. Phakiti, P. I. De Costa, L. Plonsky, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 163–182). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sterling, S., & Gass, S. (2017). Exploring the boundaries of research ethics: Perceptions of ethics and ethical behaviors in applied linguistics research. System, 50, 50–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, D. (2020). The discursive construction of resistance to sex in an online community. Discourse, Context & Media, 36, 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Marino, Francesca, Dacota Liska & Matt Kessler
2024. Chapter 5. Ethical considerations for research involving computer-assisted language learning, social media, and online environments. In Ethical Issues in Applied Linguistics Scholarship [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 7], ► pp. 72 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.