Cover not available
Part of
Ethical Issues in Applied Linguistics Scholarship
Edited by Peter I. De Costa, Amr Rabie-Ahmed and Carlo Cinaglia
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 7] 2024
► pp. 137–155

Chapter 8
Ethical research with adult migrant language learners

Challenges and responses

| Hong Kong University of Science and Technology,
| University of South Wales,
Applied Linguistics research, teacher-research and scholarship with adult language learners who are migrants holds ethical challenges in relation to social and political contexts that are under-examined in the TESOL/Applied Linguistics literature and in practice. The critical exploration in this chapter addresses this gap. With examples from participatory research-and-practice initiatives in the UK, the chapter advocates a critical participatory approach towards research, one that is oriented towards the promotion of social justice. Such an approach can support the empowerment of participants as they respond to challenging and unethical policy landscapes: through their active participation in research, learners and practitioners may be better equipped with the tools they need for resistance and change. First, the authors describe how language education researchers working with adult migrants have adopted a reflexive, critical and activist orientation towards their work. They then discuss research that relates to practice which is not attendant on top-down policy moves, and which itself might inform a critical, emancipatory orientation towards policy formation. To end, they reflect further on the notion of research that empowers, and the impact this might have on policy and practice.
Article outline
  • Introduction
    • Outline of the chapter
  • Contextualising ethics
  • Ethics in practice: Two examples
    • The speak to me project: A participatory approach
      to language education in Wales
    • Migration and settlement: Exploring belonging through arts practice
  • Commentary and reflection: Practitioner-researchers as advocates
  • Author queries
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (65)
References
Action Aid International. (2007). Reflect for ESOL resource pack. Retrieved on 25 July 2024 from [URL]
Adami, H. (2015). Language training for adult migrants in France: History, policies and institutions. In J. Simpson & A. Whiteside (Eds.), Adult language education and migration. Challenging agendas in policy and practice (pp. 128–137). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, E. R. (1993). Reexamining English only in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 9–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992). Making meaning, making change: Participatory curriculum development for adult ESL Literacy. Delta Publications.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. R., & Burgess, D. (1985). The hidden curriculum of survival ESL. TESOL Quarterly 19(3), 475–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avineri, N., Graham, L. R., Johnson, E. J., Riner, R. C. & Rosa, J. (Eds.). (2019). Language and social justice in practice. Routledge.Google Scholar
Baynham, M. (1988). Action and reflection: The Freirean argument in ESL. Language Issues 2(1), 6–12.Google Scholar
Baynham, M., Roberts, C., Cooke, M., Simpson, J., Ananiadou, K. et al. (2007). Effective Teaching and Learning ESOL. NRDC.Google Scholar
Bell, L. A. (2007). Theoretical foundations for social justice education. In M. Adams, L. A. Bell, & P. Gryphon (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (pp. 1–14). Routledge.Google Scholar
Bell, D., & Pahl, K. (2018). Co-production: Towards a utopian approach. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 21(1), 105–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blackledge, A. (2009). “As a country we do expect”: The further extension of language testing regimes in the United Kingdom. Language Assessment Quarterly 6(1), 6–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J., & Verschueren, J. (1998). Debating diversity: Analysing the discourse of tolerance. Routledge.Google Scholar
Bradley, J., & Harvey, L. (2019). Creative inquiry in Applied Linguistics: Language, communication and the arts. In C. Wright, L. Harvey, & J. Simpson (Eds.), Voices and practices in applied linguistics: Diversifying a discipline (pp. 91–107). White Rose University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. (2021). The emancipation continuum: Analysing the role of ESOL in the settlement of immigrants. British Journal of Sociology of Education 42(5–6): 864–880. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bryers, D., Winstanley, B., & Cooke, M. (2013). Whose integration? British Council.Google Scholar
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge.Google Scholar
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical. Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
(2009). Educational action research: A critical approach. In S. E. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), Sage handbook of educational action research (6th ed., pp. 74–84). Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casey, L. (2016). The Casey review into opportunity and integration. Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
Ćatibušić, B., Gallagher, F. & Karazi, S. (2019). An investigation of ESOL provision for adult Syrian refugees in Ireland: Voices of support providers. In F. Mishan (Ed.) ESOL provision in the UK and Ireland (pp. 133–155). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ćatibušić, B., Gallagher, F., & Karazi, S. (2021). Syrian voices: An exploration of the language learning needs and integration support for adult Syrian refugees in Ireland. International Journal of Inclusive Education 25(1), 22–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chick, M. (2019). Refugee resettlement in rural Wales: A collaborative approach. In F. Mishan (Ed.), ESOL provision in the UK and Ireland. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Chick, M., & Hannagan Lewis, I. (2019). Language education for forced migrants: Governance and approach. Languages 4(3), 74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooke, M. (2019). ESOL teachers as mediators of the citizenship testing regime. In M. Cooke & R. Peutrell (Eds.), Brokering Britain, educating citizens: Exploring ESOL and citizenship (pp. 63–82). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooke, M., & Peutrell, R. (2019). Brokering Britain, educating citizens: Exploring ESOL and citizenship. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cooke, M., Bryers, D., & Winstanley, B. (2018). Our languages: Sociolinguistics in multilingual participatory ESOL. Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies, 234. [URL]
Cooke, M., Winstanley, B., & Bryers, D. (2015). Whose integration? A participatory ESOL project in the UK. In J. Simpson & A. Whiteside (Eds.), Adult language education and migration: Challenging agendas in policy and practice. Routledge.Google Scholar
Cooke, M., & Simpson, J. (2008). ESOL: A critical guide. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Court, J. (2021). “Here is a long way.” Language learning, integration, and identity: A mixed methods exploration of ESOL learners’ trajectories (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Bristol.
De Costa, P., J. Lee, H. Rawal, & W. Li. (2020). Ethics in applied linguistics research. In H. Rose & J. McKinley (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in Applied Linguistics (pp. 122–128). Routledge.Google Scholar
Denscombe, M. (2002). Ground rules for good research. Open University PressGoogle Scholar
Freire, P. (1970/2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.Google Scholar
García, O., & Li, W. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giroux, H. (2020). On critical pedagogy. Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodey, C. (2021). Collaboration and learning in the community: Shifting the focus. New York State TESOL Journal 8(2), 29–38.Google Scholar
Harvey, L., Tordzro, G., & Bradley, J. (2022). Beyond and besides language: Intercultural communication and creative practice. Language and Intercultural Communication 22(2), 103–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holliday, A. (2018). Understanding intercultural communication: Negotiating a grammar of culture (2nd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Holliday, A., & MacDonald, M. (2020). Researching the intercultural: Intersubjectivity and the problem with postpositivism, Applied Linguistics 41(5), 621–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Home Office (2019). Indicators of Integration Framework. Retrieved on 25 June 2024 from [URL]
Hübschmann, Z. (2015). Migrant integration programs: The case of Germany. Global Migration Research Paper, 11. Global Migration Centre, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. E. (2006). Language and politics. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Khan, K. (2020). The counter-extremism shift in ESOL policy and the double-securitisation of Muslims. Discover Society, 1 August 2020. Retrieved on 25 June 2024 from [URL]
Lin, A. (2015). Researcher positionality. In F. M. Hult & D. C. Johnson (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide (pp. 21–32). John Wiley and Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, S., & Watson, J. (2022). Voice activated: A transformative approach to language learning. Language and Intercultural Communication 22(2), 191–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKay, S. (2019). Dislocating applied theatre: Crossing the borders between practice and context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Leeds.
Milbourne, L. (2002). Unspoken exclusion: Experiences of continued marginalisation from education among ‘hard to reach’ groups of adults and children in the UK. British Journal of Sociology of Education 23(2), 287–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (2018). Integrated Communities Strategy Green Paper. Retrieved on 25 June 2024 from [URL]
Morrice, L., Tip, L., Collyer, M., & Brown, R. (2019). “You can’t have a good integration when you don’t have good communication”: English language learning among resettled refugees in the UK. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(1), 681–699. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, H. (2015). Shaping Australian policy for Australian adult migrant English language learning. In J. Simpson & A. Whiteside (Eds.), Adult language education and migration: Challenging agendas in policy and practice (pp.19–34). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piller, I. (2015). Language ideologies. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie, & T. Sandel (Eds.), The international encyclopaedia of language and social interaction (pp. 917–927). Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pratt, M.-L. (1987). Linguistic utopias. In N. Fabb, D. Attridge, A. Durant, & C. MacCabe (Eds.), The linguistics of writing: Arguments between linguistics and literature (pp. 48–67). Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, N. (2014). Participatory action research with asylum seekers and refugees experiencing stigma and discrimination: The experience from Scotland. Disability & Society 29(1), 58–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B., Cooke, M., & Holmes, S. (2018). Promoting linguistic citizenship: Issues, problems and possibilities. Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies, 233.Google Scholar
Refugee Action (2017). Safe but alone. The role of the English language in allowing refugees to overcome loneliness. Retrieved on 25 June 2024 from [URL]
Rymes, B. (2014). Communicating beyond language. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. (2015). English language learning for adult migrants in superdiverse Britain. In J. Simpson & A. Whiteside (eds.) Adult language education and migration: Challenging agendas in policy and practice (pp. 200–213). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). ESOL, integration and immigration. New York State TESOL Journal 8(2), 5–17.Google Scholar
Simpson, J., & Bradley, J. (2021). Performing and narrating translocal belongings in migration contexts through language and arts practice. Language Teaching Research, 27(1), 136216882110445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J., & Hunter, A.-M. (2023). Policy formation for adult migrant language education in England: National neglect and its implications. Language Policy, 22, 155–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J., & Whiteside, A. (2015). Introduction. In J. Simpson & A. Whiteside (Eds.), Adult language education and migration: Challenging agendas in policy and practice (pp. 1–19). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speak to Me Project (2021). [URL]
Stroud, C. (2001). African mother-tongue programmes and the politics of language: Linguistic Citizenship versus linguistic human rights. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 22(4), 339–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic & Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vigouroux, C. (2017). Rethinking (un)skilled migrants: Whose skills, what skills, for what, and for whom. In S. Canagarajah (Ed.), Routledge handbook of migration and language. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuval-Davis, N. (2011). The politics of belonging: Intersectional contestations. Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar