Cover not available
Part of
Ethical Issues in Applied Linguistics Scholarship
Edited by Peter I. De Costa, Amr Rabie-Ahmed and Carlo Cinaglia
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 7] 2024
► pp. 173–192

Chapter 10
The ethics of indigenous language revitalization

Linguistic taxidermy or emancipation?

| University of Manitoba,
| University of Manitoba,
The ethical issue we address in this chapter is the role of Indigenous language experts who do not live in the community where an Indigenous language is spoken. Specifically, we question the ethics as well as the ethical protocols for engaging in research with Indigenous language speakers in the context of language revitalization discourses. We suggest that any judgments or decisions made by non-Indigenous language speakers with regard to standardization, orthography, digitization, pedagogy, and advocacy must be regarded as attempts at cultural and linguistic appropriation. We suggest that archiving or documenting Indigenous languages is best considered linguistic taxidermy, another move of colonization that we call fina-colonialism. In short, with reference to the specific languages of Tokunoshima, Japan, we discuss the ethics of research that purportedly aims at decolonizing, but in which Indigenous language speakers are rendered exotic representations of their own identities, commodified according to cosmopolitan interests and global tastes.
Article outline
  • An indigenous language story
  • Fina-colonialism
  • Research ethics and indigenous ethics
  • Changing cornerstones
  • Linguistic taxidermy
  • Ethical take-aways for indigenous language emancipation
  • Coda
  • Author queries
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (34)
References
Beld, J. M. (1994). Constructing a collaboration: A conversation with Egon G. Guba and Yvonna S. Lincoln. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 7(2), 99–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guay, M. L. (2023). “Some don’t even know where south is!” Linguistic strategies for spatial reference and seasons in Ishigaki Yaeyaman and their disappearance. Languages, 8(1), 9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammine, M. (2019). Our way of multilingualism: Translanguaging to break the chain of colonialism. In C. Seals & V. L. Olsen-Reeder (Eds.), Embracing multilingualism across educational contexts (pp. 100–125). Viktoria University Press.Google Scholar
(2020). Educated not to speak our language: Language attitudes and newspeakerness in the Yaeyaman language. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 20(6), 379–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023). Hear our voice: New speakers of Ryukyuan language — Negotiation, construction, and change of identities. In M. Mielick, R. Kubota, & L. Lawrence (Eds.), Discourses of identity: Language learning, teaching, and reclamation perspectives in Japan (pp.117–138). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Heinrich, P. (2018). Revitalization of the Ryukyuan languages. In L. Hinton, L. Huss, & G. Roche (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language revitalization (pp. 455–463). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023). Ryukyuan perspectives for language reclamation. Languages, 8(1), 35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heinrich, P., & Ishihara, M. (2018). Ryukyuan languages in Japan. In C. A. Seals & S. Shah (Eds.), Heritage language policies around the world (pp. 165–184). Routledge.Google Scholar
Heinrich, P., & Valsecchi, G. (2023). Ryukyuan language reclamation: Individual struggle and social change. In M. Mielick, R. Kubota, & L. Lawrence (Eds.), Discourses of identity: Language learning, teaching, and reclamation perspectives in Japan. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hinton, L., Huss, L., & Roche, G. (2018). Conclusion: What works in language revitalization? In L. Hinton, L. Huss, & G. Roche (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language revitalization (pp. 495–502). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Introduction: Language revitalization as a growing field of study and practice. In L. Hinton, L. Huss, & G. Roche (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language revitalization (pp. xxi–xxx). Routledge.Google Scholar
Karlander, D., & Salö, L. (2023). The origin of semilingualism: Nils-Erik Hansegård and the cult of the mother tongue. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 27(5), 506–525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kouritzin, S., & Nakagawa, S. (2018). Toward a sustainable, non-extractive research ethics for cross cultural, cross-linguistic research. Journal of Multicultural and Multilingual Development, 39(8), 675–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Linguistic ecosystems for foreign language learning in Canada and Japan: An international comparison of where language learning beliefs come from. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 57(3), 244–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kubota, R. (2023). Introduction to language learning, teaching, and reclamation in Japan: Diversity, inequalities, and identities. In M. Mielick, R. Kubota, & L. Lawrence (Eds.), Discourses of identity: Language learning, teaching, and reclamation perspectives in Japan (pp.1–14). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lather, P. (1988). Feminist perspectives on empowering research methodologies. Women’s Studies International Forum, 11(6), 569–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (Eds.). (2007). Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mielick, M., Kubota, R., & Lawrence, L. (2023). Discourses of identity: Language learning, teaching, and reclamation perspectives in Japan. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, H. (2023). Indigenous food sovereignty: Amami memories of a time before capitalist food systems [(MA thesis). University of Manitoba. Retrieved on 26 June 2024 from [URL]
Nakagawa, S. (2021). Auto-decolonization: Lifelong education for decolonization. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 40(4), 359–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Information and wisdom in the practice of knowledge. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education, 3(2), 24–45. Retrieved on 26 June 2024 from [URL]. DOI logo
(2007). Accord or discord: Returning to oral traditions? Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 27(2), 447–473. Retrieved on 26 June 2024 from [URL]
(2010). Yoshi Nakagawa’s poetry. Proceedings of the threatened language poetry reading 2007–2009, CD 2. Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
(2011). What kind of pen should I use to write my language and my culture? Canadian Language and Literacy E-journal, 13(1), 60–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Indigenous research methodology and the indigenous academic. Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 37(1), 95–115.Google Scholar
(2014). Tokunoshima shima-guchi and being. In Proceedings of the XV Conference of the Foundation for Endangered Languages. Foundation for Endangered Languages.Google Scholar
(2013). The quest of Shiman-chu: Questioning the absolutes of language, culture and being (Doctoral dissertation). University of Alberta. DOI logo
(2020). The incommensurability of English language pedagog[uer]y and sustainability: Spirits and protein. In J. Goulah & J. Katunich (Eds.), TESOL and sustainability: English language teaching in the Anthropocene (pp. 177–194). Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, S. & Kouritzin, S. (2011). The present tense[ion]s of English in one local context in Japan. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 8(1), 53–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, S., & Kouritzin, S. (2021). Identities of resignation: Threats to indigenous languages from neoliberal linguistic and educational practices. Language, Identity and Education, 20(5), 295–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nixon, R. (2011). Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reinharz, S. (1979). On becoming a social scientist. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Tricoire, D. (2017). Introduction. In D. Tricoire (Ed.), Enlightened colonialism: Civilization narratives and imperial politics in the age of reason (pp.1–22). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlazli, M. (2021). While we are asleep: Master/mentor-apprentice language learning initiative in the Ryukyus. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics, 20, 142–168.Google Scholar