Chapter 15
Challenges of justice and equity for ethical English as an additional language in school education
The ethical issues raised in this discussion are set against the backdrop of the English as an
Additional Language (EAL) curriculum and teaching provision for school students from ethnolingusitic minority
communities in England. At present over 19% of the school population is categorized as EAL users/learners. I will
first provide a background description of the educational policy response to ethnolinguistic diversity in the past
fifty years. The second part the discussion will focus on the educational consequences of the overwhelmingly
monolingual English-language curriculum environment (except for foreign modern languages such as French). It will be
shown that policy rhetoric and real-world consequences have not lined up coherently. After that I will examine the
principles of equality and entitlement with reference to the works of Rawls, Taylor and others as they relate to the
‘mainstreaming’ approach to education provision in the context of ethnolinguistic diversity. I will conclude with some
observations on the possible curricular and pedagogic provision that would begin to recognise minoritized EAL
students’ language education needs. While the focus of this discussion is on EAL in England, it is hoped that some of
the arguments for equity for all would resonate with the considerations for minoritized students on grounds of
language, disabilities, gender and other issues in public education in other world locations.
Article outline
- Introduction
- English an additional language in school education in England
- EAL — ethnolinguistic diversity and social justice
- Reflections and looking ahead: EAL as an equitable
and fair educational provision
- Inclusive education ethos that recognizes difference
- Pedagogic language models for linguistic diversity
- Difference-oriented teacher professionalism
- Concluding remarks
-
References