Cover not available
Article published In:
Les prépositions complexes dans les langues romanes
Edited by Benjamin Fagard, José Pinto De Lima and Dejan Stosic
[Revue Romane 54:1] 2019
► pp. 141–175

Usage-based account of Italian Complex Prepositions denoting the Agent

| Università Roma Tre
| Università Roma Tre | UNINT

This paper takes into account a particular set of Italian Complex Prepositions signaling the agent of an action (e.g. da parte di ‘by’, a nome di ‘by’). Italian exhibits several types of complex prepositions revealing a different involvement of the Agent: in particular, these complex lexemes can introduce and distinguish the participants who (i) plan and intentionally conceive an action, (ii) perform it and/or (iii) have a coercive power over its performing.

The contribution aims to: (i) distinguish these Italian complex prepositions according to their functions, meanings, and the degree of involvement of the participant they introduce; (ii) analyze the collocational features and the syntactic environments where these lexemes occur; (iii) individuate possible correlations between their frequency of occurrence and the grammatical value; (iv) analyze their diachronic evolution across different historical phases; (v) put into relation the synchronic restrictions with the original syntactic environment within which the complex prepositions have been reanalyzed.

Keywords: Italian complex prepositions, Agent marking, diachronic analysis, grammaticalization
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.State of the art
  • 2.Data collection and methodology
  • 3.Complex prepositions and classes of agenthood in Contemporary Italian
    • 3.1Contemporary Italian performer
    • 3.2Contemporary Italian animated instrumental
    • 3.3Contemporary Italian instigator and conceiver
  • 4.Diachronic Analysis
    • 4.1Old Italian performer
    • 4.2Old Italian animated instrumental
    • 4.3Old Italian conceiver and instigator
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
  • Corpora and dictionaries
Published online: 22 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.00019.piu
References
Baroni, M., S. Bernardini, F. Comastri, L. Piccioni, A. Volpi, G. Aston & M. Mazzoleni
(2004): Introducing the La Repubblica corpus: a large, annotated, TEI(XML)-compliant corpus of newspaper Italian, in: Lino, M. T., M. F. Xavier, F. Ferreira, R. Costa & R. Silva (eds.): Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, (LREC 2004, Lisbon, May 26th-28th 2004). ELRA – European Language Resources Association, Paris, pp. 1771–1774.Google Scholar
Bosque, I.
(eds.) (2006): Diccionario combinatorio práctico del español contemporáneo. Las palabras en su context. SM, Madrid.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2006): From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition. Language, 82,4, pp. 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011): Usage-based Theory and Grammaticalization, in: Narrog, H. & B. Heine (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 69–78.Google Scholar
Casadei, F.
(2001): Le locuzioni preposizionali. Struttura lessicale e gradi di lessicalizzazione. Lingua e Stile, 36,1, pp. 21–36.Google Scholar
Comrie, B.
(1981): Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
(1989): Language Universals and Linguistic Typology, 2nd ed. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cruse, A. D.
(1973): Some thoughts on agentivity. Journal of Linguistics, 91, pp. 11–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, G.
(2002): A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization, in: Wischer, I. & G. Diewald (eds.): New Reflections on Grammaticalization. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, pp. 103-120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, D.
(1991): Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67(3), pp. 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fagard, B.
(2010): Espace et grammaticalisation. L’évolution sémantique des prépositions dans les langues romanes. Éditions Universitaires Européennes, Sarrebruck.Google Scholar
Fagard, B. & W. De Mulder
(2007): La formation des prépositions complexes: grammati- calisation ou lexicalisation?. Langue Française, 1561, pp. 9–29.Google Scholar
Ganfi, V. & V. Piunno
(2017): Preposizioni complesse in italiano antico e contemporaneo. Grammaticalizzazione, schematismo e produttività. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, CII,2, pp. 184–204.Google Scholar
Garcia, D. D. & B. C. Dias da Silva
(2015): PrepNet.Br: a Semantic Network for Prepositions, in: Proceedings of Symposium in Information and Human Language Technology. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, Natal, pp. 75–79.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A.
(1994): Fonti di grammaticalizzazione. Sulla ricategorizzazione di verbi e nomi come preposizioni, in: Cipriano, P., P. Di Giovine & M. Mancini (eds.): Miscellanea di studi linguistici in onore di Walter Belardi. Il Calamo, Roma, vol. II1, pp. 877–896.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.
(1995): Constructions. A construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structures. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
(2006): Constructions at work. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S.
(2004): Are Low-Frequency Complex Prepositions Grammaticalized? On the Limits of Corpus Data – and the Importance of Intuition, in: Lindquist, H. & C. Mair (eds.): Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, pp. 171–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, S.
(2005): Grammaticalization and English complex prepositions. A corpus-based study. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J.
(1996): Some recent trends in grammaticalization. Annual Review of Anthropology, 251, pp. 217–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C.
(2003): Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klégr, A.
(2002): English Complex Prepositions of the Type in Spite of and Analogous Sequences. A Study & Dictionary. The Karolinum Press, Prague Charles University.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C.
(1996): Control in Yucatec Maya, in: François, J. (ed.): La sémantique des relations actancielles à travers les langues. UMR du CNRS “LanDisCo” & Université des Sciences Humaines, Strasbourg, pp. 105–127.Google Scholar
(2002): New reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization, in: Wischer, I. & G. Diewald (eds.): New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Proceedings from the International Symposium on Grammaticalization 17–19 June 1999, Potsdam, Germany (Typological Studies in Language, 49.). John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, pp. 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017): Grammaticalization and automation, JournaLIPP, 51, pp. 33–48.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. & Mulholland, J.
(1964): Complex prepositions and related sequences, English Studies (Supplement: Festschrift for R. W. Zandvoort), 451, pp. 64–73.Google Scholar
Piunno, V.
(2016): CombiNet. A Corpus-based Online Database of Italian Word Combinations, in: Kernerman, I., I. Kosem, S. Krek & L. Trap-Jensen (eds.): GLOBALEX 2016. Lexicographic resources for human language technology. Portorož, 24 maggio 2016, Paris, ELRA – European Language Resources Association, pp. 45–51.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik
(1985): A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman, London and New York.Google Scholar
Ramat, P.
(1992): Thoughts on degrammaticalization. Linguistics, 301, pp. 549–560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saint-Dizier, P.
(2005): PrepNet: A framework for describing prepositions: Preliminary investigation results, in: Bunt, H., J. Geertzen & E. Thijsse (eds.) Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Computational Semantics (IWCS’05). Tilburg, The Netherlands, pp. 145–157.Google Scholar
Simone, R.
(2017): Word as a stratification of formats, in: D’Alessandro, R., G. Iannàccaro, D. Passino & A. M. Thornton (eds.): Di tutti i colori. Studi linguistici per Maria Grossmann. Utrecht University, Utrecht, pp. 335–347.Google Scholar
Simone, R. & D. Cerbasi
(2000): Types and Diachronic Evolution of Romance Causative Constructions, Romanische Forschungen, pp. 441–473.Google Scholar
Simone, R. & V. Piunno
(2017): Combinazioni di parole che costituiscono entrata. Rappresentazione lessicografica e aspetti lessicologici, Studi e saggi linguistici, LV1, pp. 13–44.Google Scholar
Veland, R.
(2011): Le locuzioni preposizionali a(d) opera di, per opera di, per mano di in italiano contemporaneo: funzionamento sintattico e proprietà semantiche, Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 128,3, pp. 537–552.Google Scholar
Voghera, M.
(1994): Lessemi complessi: percorsi di lessicalizzazione a confronto, Lingua e Stile. 29,2, pp. 185–214.Google Scholar
(2004): Polirematiche, in: Grossmann, M. & F. Rainer (eds.): La formazione delle parole in italiano. Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tübingen, pp. 56–69.Google Scholar

Corpora and dictionaries

Corpus La Repubblica:
[URL]
Morfologia dell’Italiano in DIAcronia
[URL]
Tesoro della Lingua Italiana delle Origini
[URL]
Opera del Vocabolario Italiano
[URL]
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Ganfi, Vittorio, Valentina Piunno & Lunella Mereu
2023. Body part metaphors in phraseological expressions. Languages in Contrast 23:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Piunno, Valentina
2020. Partially filled constructions in some Romance languages. Schematicity and semantic predictability. Romanica Olomucensia 32:1 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Piunno, Valentina & Vittorio Ganfi
2020. Synchronic and diachronic analysis of prepositional multiword modifiers across Romance languages. Lingvisticae Investigationes 43:2 ► pp. 352 ff. DOI logo
Ursini, Francesco-Alessio & Tong Wu
2024. On Italian spatial prepositions and measure phrases: reconciling the data with theoretical accounts. Linguistics 62:2 ► pp. 491 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.