Article published in:
Les prépositions complexes dans les langues romanes
Edited by Benjamin Fagard, José Pinto De Lima and Dejan Stosic
[Revue Romane 54:1] 2019
► pp. 141175
References

References

Baroni, M., S. Bernardini, F. Comastri, L. Piccioni, A. Volpi, G. Aston & M. Mazzoleni
(2004): Introducing the La Repubblica corpus: a large, annotated, TEI(XML)-compliant corpus of newspaper Italian, in: Lino, M. T., M. F. Xavier, F. Ferreira, R. Costa & R. Silva (eds.): Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, (LREC 2004, Lisbon, May 26th-28th 2004). ELRA – European Language Resources Association, Paris, pp. 1771–1774.Google Scholar
Bosque, I.
(eds.) (2006): Diccionario combinatorio práctico del español contemporáneo. Las palabras en su context. SM, Madrid.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2006): From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition. Language, 82,4, pp. 711–733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011): Usage-based Theory and Grammaticalization, in: Narrog, H. & B. Heine (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 69–78.Google Scholar
Casadei, F.
(2001): Le locuzioni preposizionali. Struttura lessicale e gradi di lessicalizzazione. Lingua e Stile, 36,1, pp. 21–36.Google Scholar
Comrie, B.
(1981): Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
(1989): Language Universals and Linguistic Typology, 2nd ed. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cruse, A. D.
(1973): Some thoughts on agentivity. Journal of Linguistics, 9, pp. 11–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, G.
(2002): A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization, in: Wischer, I. & G. Diewald (eds.): New Reflections on Grammaticalization. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, pp. 103-120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, D.
(1991): Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67(3), pp. 547–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fagard, B.
(2010): Espace et grammaticalisation. L’évolution sémantique des prépositions dans les langues romanes. Éditions Universitaires Européennes, Sarrebruck.Google Scholar
Fagard, B. & W. De Mulder
(2007): La formation des prépositions complexes: grammati- calisation ou lexicalisation?. Langue Française, 156, pp. 9–29.Google Scholar
Ganfi, V. & V. Piunno
(2017): Preposizioni complesse in italiano antico e contemporaneo. Grammaticalizzazione, schematismo e produttività. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, CII,2, pp. 184–204.Google Scholar
[ p. 174 ]
Garcia, D. D. & B. C. Dias da Silva
(2015): PrepNet.Br: a Semantic Network for Prepositions, in: Proceedings of Symposium in Information and Human Language Technology. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, Natal, pp. 75–79.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A.
(1994): Fonti di grammaticalizzazione. Sulla ricategorizzazione di verbi e nomi come preposizioni, in: Cipriano, P., P. Di Giovine & M. Mancini (eds.): Miscellanea di studi linguistici in onore di Walter Belardi. Il Calamo, Roma, vol. II, pp. 877–896.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.
(1995): Constructions. A construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structures. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
(2006): Constructions at work. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S.
(2004): Are Low-Frequency Complex Prepositions Grammaticalized? On the Limits of Corpus Data – and the Importance of Intuition, in: Lindquist, H. & C. Mair (eds.): Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, pp. 171–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, S.
(2005): Grammaticalization and English complex prepositions. A corpus-based study. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J.
(1996): Some recent trends in grammaticalization. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, pp. 217–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C.
(2003): Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klégr, A.
(2002): English Complex Prepositions of the Type in Spite of and Analogous Sequences. A Study & Dictionary. The Karolinum Press, Prague Charles University.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C.
(1996): Control in Yucatec Maya, in: François, J. (ed.): La sémantique des relations actancielles à travers les langues. UMR du CNRS “LanDisCo” & Université des Sciences Humaines, Strasbourg, pp. 105–127.Google Scholar
(2002): New reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization, in: Wischer, I. & G. Diewald (eds.): New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Proceedings from the International Symposium on Grammaticalization. 17–19 June 1999, Potsdam, Germany (Typological Studies in Language, 49.). John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, pp. 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017): Grammaticalization and automation, JournaLIPP, 5, pp. 33–48.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. & Mulholland, J.
(1964): Complex prepositions and related sequences, English Studies (Supplement: Festschrift for R. W. Zandvoort), 45, pp. 64–73.Google Scholar
Piunno, V.
(2016): CombiNet. A Corpus-based Online Database of Italian Word Combinations, in: Kernerman, I., I. Kosem, S. Krek & L. Trap-Jensen (eds.): GLOBALEX 2016. Lexicographic resources for human language technology. Portorož, 24 maggio 2016, Paris, ELRA – European Language Resources Association, pp. 45–51.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik
(1985): A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman, London and New York.Google Scholar
Ramat, P.
(1992): Thoughts on degrammaticalization. Linguistics, 30, pp. 549–560. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saint-Dizier, P.
(2005): PrepNet: A framework for describing prepositions: Preliminary investigation results, in: Bunt, H., J. Geertzen & E. Thijsse (eds.) Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Computational Semantics (IWCS’05). Tilburg, The Netherlands, pp. 145–157.Google Scholar
Simone, R.
(2017): Word as a stratification of formats, in: D’Alessandro, R., G. Iannàccaro, D. Passino & A. M. Thornton (eds.): Di tutti i colori. Studi linguistici per Maria Grossmann. Utrecht University, Utrecht, pp. 335–347.Google Scholar
[ p. 175 ]
Simone, R. & D. Cerbasi
(2000): Types and Diachronic Evolution of Romance Causative Constructions, Romanische Forschungen, pp. 441–473.Google Scholar
Simone, R. & V. Piunno
(2017): Combinazioni di parole che costituiscono entrata. Rappresentazione lessicografica e aspetti lessicologici, Studi e saggi linguistici, LV, pp. 13–44.Google Scholar
Veland, R.
(2011): Le locuzioni preposizionali a(d) opera di, per opera di, per mano di in italiano contemporaneo: funzionamento sintattico e proprietà semantiche, Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 128,3, pp. 537–552.Google Scholar
Voghera, M.
(1994): Lessemi complessi: percorsi di lessicalizzazione a confronto, Lingua e Stile. 29,2, pp. 185–214.Google Scholar
(2004): Polirematiche, in: Grossmann, M. & F. Rainer (eds.): La formazione delle parole in italiano. Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tübingen, pp. 56–69.Google Scholar

Corpora and dictionaries

Morfologia dell’Italiano in DIAcronia
Tesoro della Lingua Italiana delle Origini