Cover not available
Article published In:
Revue Romane
Vol. 58:1 (2023) ► pp.128–153
articles linguistiques

Dislocazioni a destra interrogative tra grammatica e discorso

ORCID logo | Ghent University
 | Ghent University
This article deals with clitic right dislocation (CLRD) structures. The interface examination of the interpretative, syntactic and prosodic properties of CLRDs shows that these constructions can be ordered on a scale based to a minor or greater degree of prosodic and syntactic integration between verb and post-verbal object. This scale of integration is based on the hypothesis that the different dislocations are part of a complex system of resources for the post-verbal expression of topic and focus categories. Crucially, the study shows that in interrogative CLRDs the clitic resumes an accessible referent which is also focal, manifesting the greater intersubjective attitude of the speaker. The work is based on the analysis of spoken data mostly taken from the CLIPS corpus.
Keywords: right dislocation, Italian, question, clitic, syntax-prosody interface, syntactic and prosodic integration
Article outline
  • 1.Introduzione
  • 2.Il ripensamento
  • 3.La dislocazione a destra con clitico in frase dichiarativa
  • 4.L’emarginazione
  • 5.Il caso della dislocazione con clitico in frase interrogativa
  • 6.Livelli di integrazione nelle costruzioni dislocate
  • 6.Conclusioni
  • Notes
  • Riferimenti bibliografici

Article language: Italian

Published online: 12 June 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.18017.cro
References (49)
Riferimenti bibliografici
Albom, A. (2014): Right-dislocation in Italian and Spanish. A contrastive analysis, in: Iørn Korzen et al. (ed.): Tra romanistica e germanistica: lingua, testo, cognizione e cultura, Peter Lang, Bern, pp. 15–34.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, E. (2006): Clitic Doubling. In: M. Everaert, & H. van Riemsdijk (eds.): The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Volume I1, Blackwell Publishing, pp. 519–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, A. H., M. Bader, E. G. Bard, E. H. Boyle, G. M. Doherty, S. C. Garrod, S. D. Isard, J. C. Kowtko, J. M. McAllister, J. Miller, C. F. Sotillo, H. S. Thompson & R. Weinert. (1991). The HCRC Map Task Corpus. Language and Speech 34, 4, pp. 351–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antinucci, F. & Cinque, G. (1977): Sull’ordine delle parole in italiano: l’emarginazione. Studi di grammatica italiana, 61, pp. 121–146.Google Scholar
Badan, L. & C. Crocco. (2019): Focus in Italian echo wh-questions: an analysis at syntax-prosody interface. Probus, 31(1), pp. 29–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A. (1999): “Inversion” as focalization and related questions. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 71, pp. 9–45.Google Scholar
(2004): Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures 31, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Benincà, P. (1988): L’ordine degli elementi della frase e le costruzioni marcate, in: L. Renzi et al. (eds.): Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, vol. 11, il Mulino, Bologna, pp. 115–194.Google Scholar
Berretta, M. (1986): Riprese anaforiche e tipi di testo: il monologo espositivo, in: K. Lichem et al. (eds.): Parallela 2. Aspetti della sintassi dell’italiano contemporaneo, Narr, Tübingen, pp. 47–59.Google Scholar
(1989): Tracce di coniugazione oggettiva in italiano, in: F. Foresti et al. (eds.), L’italiano tra le lingue romanze, Bulzoni, Roma, pp. 125–150.Google Scholar
Berruto, G. (1986): Le dislocazioni a destra in italiano, in: H. Stammerjohann (ed.), Tema-Rema in Italiano/ Theme-Rheme in Italian/ Thema-Rhema im Italienischen, Narr, Tübingen, pp. 55–69.Google Scholar
Bocci, G. (2013): The syntax-prosody interface from a cartographic perspective: Evidence from Italian, Benjamins, Amsterdam & Philadelphia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calabrese, A. (1982): Alcune ipotesi sulla struttura informazionale della frase in italiano e sul suo rapporto con la struttura fonologica, Rivista di grammatica generativa 71, pp. 3–78.Google Scholar
(1988): I pronomi clitici. In: L. Renzi et al. (ed.): Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, vol. I1., Il Mulino, Bologna, pp. 549–92.Google Scholar
Capone, A. (2001): Modal adverbs and discourse, ETS, Pisa.Google Scholar
(2003): Theories of presuppositions and presuppositional clitics. In: P. Kühnlein, H. Rieser & H. Zeevat (eds.), Perspectives on dialogue in the new millennium, Benjamins, New York, pp.111–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, A. (2002): Against optional and null clitics. right dislocation vs. marginalization. Studia Linguistica, 561, pp. 29–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carletta, J., Isard, A., Isard, S., Kowtko, J., Doherty-Sneddon, G. and Anderson, A. (1997): The reliability of a dialogue structure coding scheme, Computational Linguistics, 231, pp. 13–31.Google Scholar
Cecchetto, C. (1999): A comparative analysis of left and right dislocation in Romance, Studia Linguistica, 531, pp. 40–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. (1987): Cognitive Constraints on Information Flow, in: R. Tomlin (ed.): Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 21–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G. (1999): Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Crocco, C. (2013): Is Italian clitic right dislocation grammaticalised? A prosodic analysis of yes/no questions and statements, Lingua, 1331, pp. 30–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crocco, C., & Badan, L. (2016): ‘L’hai messo dove il focus?’ Un’analisi prosodica delle domande eco wh-, in: Savy, R. & Alfano, I. (eds.): La fonetica nell’apprendimento delle lingue, Officina 21, Milano, pp.191–207.Google Scholar
D’Imperio, M. (2001): Focus and tonal structure in Neapolitan Italian. Speech Communication 33(4), pp. 339–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faloppa, F. (2010): Dislocazioni, in: Simone, R. (ed.): Enciclopedia dell’italiano. Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana, Treccani, Rome, pp. 385–389.Google Scholar
Ferrari, A. (1999): L’extra-posizione a destra in italiano, con osservazioni sul francese. In: Skytte, G., Sabatini, F. (eds.): Linguisticatestuale comparativa. In memoriam Maria-Elisabeth Conte, Atti del convegno interannuale della Società di Linguistica Italiana (Copenhagen, 5–7 febbraio 1998 = Etudesromanes 42), Copenhagen, Museum Tusculanum, pp. 111–140.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, M. (2000): The Syntax-Phonology Interface in Focus and Topic Constructions in Italian. Kluwer, Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, M. & R. Hinterhölzl. (2007): Types of topics in German and Italian, in: S. Winkler & K. Schwabe (eds.): On information structure, meaning and form, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 87–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frota, S. & Prieto, P. (2015): Intonation in Romance. Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gili-Fivela, B., Avesani, C., Barone, M., Bocci, G., Crocco, C., D’Imperio, M., Giordano, R., Marotta, G., Savino, M. & Sorianello, P. (2015): Varieties of Italian and their intonational phonology. In: S. Frota & P. Prieto (eds.): Intonational variation in romance, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp.140–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J. (1988): Universals of topic-comment structure. In: M. Hammond, E. Moravcsik, J. Wirth (eds.): Studies in syntactic typology, Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 209–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, L. (1991): Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach. In: S. Chiba et al. (eds.): Aspects of Modern English: Papers presented to Masatomo Ukaji on his 60th birthday, Kaitakusji, Tokyo, pp. 232–254.Google Scholar
Horváth, M. (2018). Le français parlé informel. De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1981): Topic, Antitopic and Verb Agreement in Non-Standard French, Benjamins: Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994): Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001): Dislocation, in: Haspelmath, Martin et al. (eds.): Language Typology and Language Universals / Sprachtypologie und sprachliche Universalien. An International Handbook, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 1050–1078.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, A. (2009): Grammatica diacronica del napoletano. Niemeyer, Tübingen. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R. (1994): The Antisymmetry of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Krifka, M. (2007): Basic Notions of Information Structure, in: Féry, C., G. Fanselow & M. Krifka (eds.): The Notions of Information Structure. Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 61, Working papers of the SFB 63, pp. 213–55.Google Scholar
Nespor, M. & I. Vogel. (1986): Prosodic phonology. Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Pean, V., S. Williams & Eskenazy, M. (1993): The design and recording of ICY. Eurospeech 1993, Berlin, pp. 627–630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1997): The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery, in: Liliane Haegeman (ed.): Elements of Grammar: A Handbook of Generative Syntax, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 281–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossi, F. (1999): Non lo sai che ora è? Alcune considerazioni sull’intonazione e sul valore pragmatico degli enunciati con dislocazione a destra. Studi di grammatica italiana, 181, pp. 144–93.Google Scholar
(2016): Dislocazione a destra/a sinistra in due corpora di italiano scritto: tra grammaticalizzazione, ammiccamento e coesione. In Ruffino, G., Castiglione, M. (eds.) La lingua variabile nei testi letterari, artistici e funzionali contemporanei. Analisi, interpretazione, traduzione, Cesati, Firenze, pp. 847–859.Google Scholar
Rooth, M. (1992): A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 11, pp. 75–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996): Focus, in: Shalom Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 271–298.Google Scholar
Samek-Lodovici, V. (2015): The Interaction of Focus, Givenness, and Prosody A Study of Italian Clause Structure. Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics, Oxford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wanner, D. (1987): Clitic Pronouns in Italian: A Linguistic Guide. Italica, 64, 3, pp. 410–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998): Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Belligh, Thomas & Claudia Crocco
2022. Theticity and sentence-focus in Italian: grammatically encoded categories or categories of language use?. Linguistics 60:4 ► pp. 1241 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.