Cover not available
Article published In:
Revue Romane
Vol. 55:2 (2020) ► pp.283–310
Articles Linguistiques

Avér o gavér?

Questo è il dilemma! Microvariazione negli esiti del latino habere nel nord d’Italia

ORCID logo | University of Oxford

This contribution is an investigation of the distribution and nature of a structure found across Northern Italian varieties, a reflex of Latin habere to which a locative particle g has been added, within the contexts of the relation between microvariation and gradual language change. A detailed morpho-syntactic description forms the basis for an analysis that suggests a probable path of univerbation of the two elements. Driving the analysis is the consideration of the original semantic features of the Latin element from which the locative particle has developed, in particular of the order of their weakening.

Keywords: language change, gradualness of change, (synchronic) microvariation, Northern Italian reflexes of Latin habere , semantic bleaching, semantic retention
Article outline
  • Introduzione
  • 1.Il verbo avere
  • 2.Uso lessicale e uso funzionale
  • 3.Presenza di forme pronominali complemento proclitiche
  • 4.Forma infinita
  • 5.Gradualità del cambiamento diacronico e microvariazione sincronica
  • 6.Interpretazione della microvariazione nelle forme esito di habere
    • 6.1Verbo lessicale e ausiliare
    • 6.2Presenza di clitici complemento con verbo ausiliare
    • 6.3Forma infinita del verbo
    • 6.4Distribuzione geografica
  • 7.Conclusioni
  • Ringraziamenti
  • Nota
  • Bibliografia

Article language: Italian

Published online: 19 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.19004.pao
References

Bibliografia

Benincà, P.
(2007): Clitici e ausiliari: gh ò, z é, in: Bentley, D. e Ledgeway, A. (a cura di): Sui dialetti italoromanzi: saggi in onore di Nigel B. Vincent (The Italianist 27, Special Supplement I), pp. 27–47.Google Scholar
(2016): An interview on linguistic variation with … Paola Benincà. Isogloss, 2/21, pp. 139–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benincà, P., Parry, M. e Pescarini, D.
(2016): The dialects of Northern Italy, in: Ledgeway, A. e Maiden, M. (a cura di): The Oxford guide to the Romance languages (Oxford guides to the world’s languages), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 185–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonfadini, G.
(1983): Il confine linguistico veneto-lombardo, in: Cortelazzo, M. (a cura di): Guida ai dialetti veneti. CLEUP, Padova, Vol. 51, pp. 23–59.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2014): Cognitive Processes in Grammaticalization, in: Tomasello, M. (a cura di): The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Vol. II1 (Psychology Press & Routledge Classic Editions), pp. 145–167.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R. e Pagliuca, W.
(1994): The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
(2000): Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Longman, London.Google Scholar
Ferguson, R.
(2007): A linguistic History of Venice. Leo. S. Olschki Editore, Venezia.Google Scholar
Freeze, R.
(1992): Existentials and other locatives. Language, 68(3), pp. 553–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A., Mauri, A. e Molinelli, P.
(2013) (a cura di): Synchrony and diachrony: a dynamic interface, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goebl, H., Böhmer, H., Dautermann, I., Bauer, R. e Haimerl, E.
(1998): Atlant linguistich dl ladin dolomitich y di dialec vejins, 1a pert = Atlante linguistico del ladino dolomitico e dei dialetti limitrofi, 1a parte = Sprachatlas des Dolomitenladinischen und angrenzender Dialekte, 1. Teil. Reichert, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Goebl, H.
(2012): Atlant linguistich dl ladin dolomitich y di dialec vejins, 2a pert = Atlante linguistico del ladino dolomitico e dei dialetti limitrofi, 2a parte = Sprachatlas des Dolomitenladinischen und angrenzender Dialekte, 2. Teil. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Heine, B.
(1997): Possession, Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, N.
(2004): Lexicalization and Grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal?, in: Bisang, W., Himmelmann, N. e Wiemer, B. (a cura di): What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components. Mouton De Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp. 21–42.Google Scholar
Jaberg, K. e Jud, J.
(1928–1940): Sprach- und Sachatlas Italiens und der Südschweiz. Zofingen.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S.
(1975): French Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
(1996): Microparametric Syntax. Some Introductory Remarks, in Black, J. R. e Motapanyane, V. (a cura di): Microparametric Syntax and Dialect Variation. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. ix–xviii. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, C.
([1982, 1995/2005] 2015): Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Terza edizione, Classics in Linguistics, Language Science Press. Disponibile online [URL]
Marcato, G. e Ursini, F.
(1998): Dialetti veneti: grammatica e storia. Unipress, Padova.Google Scholar
Penello, N.
(2004): I clitici locativo e partititvo nelle varietà italiane settentrionali, in: Patruno, B. e Polo, C. (a cura di): Quaderni di Lavoro dell’Atlante Sintattico dell’Italia Settentrionale 41, pp. 37–103. Disponibile online a [URL]
Poletto, C.
(2000): The higher functional field: evidence from northern Italian dialects. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
(2012): Contrastive Linguistics and Micro-Variation: The Role of Dialectology. Languages in Contrast: International Journal for Contrastive Linguistics, 12(1), pp. 47–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohlfs, G.
(1968): Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Morfologia. Einaudi Editore, Torino.Google Scholar
(1969): Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Sintassi e formazione delle parole. Einaudi Editore, Torino.Google Scholar
Sabatini, F.
(1985): L’ “italiano dell’uso medio”. Una realtà tra le varietà linguistiche italiane, in: Holtus, G. e Radtke, E. (a cura di): Gesprochenes Italienisch in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Gunter Narr Verlag, Tübingen, pp. 154–184.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. e Heine, B.
(1991): Introduction, in: Traugott, E. e Heine, B. (a cura di): Approaches to grammaticalization (Typological studies in language; 19). Vol. 21: Focus on types of grammatical markers. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. e Trousdale, G.
(2010) (a cura di): Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vincent, N.
(1982): The development of auxiliaries habere and esse in Romance, in: Vincent, N. e Harris, M. (a cura di): Studies in the Romance verb: Essays offered to Joe Cremona on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Croom Helm, London, pp. 71–96.Google Scholar
Zamboni, A.
(1974): Veneto (Profilo dei dialetti italiani 5). Pacini, Pisa.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Vardakis, Georgios
2023. Documenting Corfioto: Evidence for Contact-Induced Grammaticalization in the Romance Variety of the Jewish Community of Corfu. In Internal and External Causes of Language Change, ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.