Cover not available
Article published In:
Revue Romane
Vol. 57:1 (2022) ► pp.86–115
Articles linguistiques

Overlapping subjunctive forms in Gallo- and Ibero-Romance verb paradigms

 | CNRS (LLACAN, UMR 8135)
In several varieties of Catalan, Valencian and Occitan, inflectional exponents originating in the imperfect subjunctive (reflex of Latin pluperfect subjunctive) are analogically extended into the first and second person plural present subjunctive forms, resulting in syncretism between present and imperfect subjunctive forms for the relevant persons. The scope and directionality of such extensions are remarkably consistent, and are indicative of a change driven by the structure of the inflectional paradigm in the relevant varieties. A significant consequence of this development, which fits into a general Romance tendency for analogical remodelling of first and second person plural forms, is alignment between previously overlapping distributions of stem allomorphs and stress placement, and thus greater predictability of inflected forms.
Keywords: syncretism, analogical change, verb inflection, Occitan, Catalan, Valencian
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Present and imperfect subjunctives in the diachrony of Romance metamorphomes
    • 2.1Romance metamorphomes involving the present and imperfect subjunctives
    • 2.2Clash, coalescence and shared exponents
  • 3.Analogical extension of root allomorphs and stem formatives
    • 3.1Spread of a thematic velar consonant
    • 3.2Summary
  • 4.Importation and syncretism
    • 4.1Importation with syncretism, affecting prs.sbjv.1pl and prs.sbjv.2pl
      • 4.1.1Overview of importation with syncretism
      • 4.1.2Interaction with conjugation class and root allomorphy
      • 4.1.3Existing approaches to the actuation and directionality of importation with syncretism
    • 4.2Importation without syncretism, affecting prs.sbjv.1pl and prs.sbjv.2pl
    • 4.3Importation and category loss
    • 4.4Summary
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.20009.esh
References (56)
References
Ackerman, F., J. P. Blevins & R. Malouf. (2009): Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms, in: Blevins, J. P. & J. Blevins (eds.): Analogy in grammar. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 54–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alcover, A. & F. de B. Moll. (1929–1933): La flexió verbal en els dialectes catalans. Anuari de l’Oficina romànica de lingüística i literatura 21, pp. 79–184, 31, pp. 73–168, 41, pp. 9–104, 51, pp. 9–72.Google Scholar
Alibèrt, L. (1976): Gramatica occitana segon los parlars lengadocians. CEO, Montpellier.Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. (1994): Morphology by itself. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Baerman, M. (2007): Syncretism. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 5, pp. 539–551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baerman, M., D. Brown & G. Corbett. (2005): The Syntax-Morphology Interface. A Study of Syncretism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, J. (2016): Word and paradigm morphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonami, O. (2014): La structure fine des paradigmes de flexion. HDR dissertation, Université Paris Diderot, Paris.Google Scholar
Bonami, O. & G. Boyé (2002): Suppletion and stem dependency in inflectional morphology, in: Van Eynde, F., L. Hellan & D. Beerman (eds.): Proceedings of the HPSG ’01 Conference. SCLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 51–70.Google Scholar
(2003): Supplétion et classes flexionnelles dans la conjugaison du français. Langages, 1521, pp. 102–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brun-Trigaud, G. (1990): Le Croissant: le concept et le mot. Doctoral dissertation, Université Lyon III, Lyon.Google Scholar
Camproux, C. (1962): Essai de géographie linguistique du Gévaudan. Presses Universitaires de France, Montpellier.Google Scholar
Carrera, A. (2007): Gramatica aranesa. Pagès, Lhèida.Google Scholar
Casagrande, S. (2011): L’unité et la diversité des systèmes verbaux en langue d’oc et dans les aires limitrophes. Essai de reconstruction. Doctoral dissertation, Université de Nice, Nice.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. (2007): Canonical Typology, Suppletion, and Possible Words. Language, 831, pp. 8–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enger, H.-O. (2014): Reinforcement in inflection classes: Two cues may be better than one. Word Structure, 7, 2, pp. 153–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esher, L. (2015): Morphomes and predictability in the history of Romance perfects. Diachronica, 32, 4, pp. 494–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016): Morphomic distribution of augments in varieties of Occitan. Revue Romane, 51, 2, pp. 271–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020): Syncretism and metamorphomes in northern Occitan (Lemosin) varieties, in: Wolfe, S. & M. Maiden (eds.): Variation and change in Gallo-Romance grammar. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 364–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guérin, M. (2019): Grammaire du parler marchois de Dompierre-les-Églises. L’Harmattan, Paris.Google Scholar
Guerrero, A. (2011): Verbal inflection in central Catalan: A realisational analysis. Lingue e linguaggio, 101, pp. 265–282.Google Scholar
(2014): Analyse thématique de la flexion en catalan central standard. Doctoral dissertation, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse.Google Scholar
Hinzelin, M.-O. (2011a): Syncretism and suppletion in Gallo-Romance verb paradigms, in: Maiden, M., J. C. Smith, M. Goldbach & M.-O. Hinzelin (eds.): Morphological Autonomy. Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 287–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011b): La morphologie verbale du nord-occitan dans l’ensemble gallo-roman, in: Rieger, A. & D. Sumien (eds.): L’Occitanie invitée de l’Euregio. Liège 1981 – Aix-la-Chapelle 2008. Bilan et perspectives. Actes du Neuvième Congrès International de l’AIEO, Aix-la-Chapelle, 24–31 août 2008. Vol. II. Shaker, Aachen, pp. 719–732.Google Scholar
(2012): Verb morphology gone astray: Syncretism patterns in Gallo-Romance, in: Gaglia, S. & M.-O. Hinzelin (eds.): Inflection and Word Formation in Romance Languages. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 55–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juge, M. (2013): Analogy as a source of suppletion, in: Kikusawa, R. & L. A. Reid (eds.): Historical Linguistics 2011. Selected papers from the 20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Osaka, 25–30 July 2011. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 175–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koschwitz, E. (1973 [1894]): Grammaire historique de la langue des Félibres. Slatkine Reprints, Genève.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1990): How to do things with junk. Journal of Linguistics, 26, 1, pp. 76–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maiden, M. (2000): Di un cambiamento intramorfologico: Origini del tipo dissi dicesti ecc., nell’italoromanzo. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, 85, 2, pp. 137–171.Google Scholar
(2001): A strange affinity: perfecto y tiempos afines. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 581, pp. 441–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004): Verb augments and meaninglessness in Romance morphology. Studi di grammatica italiana, 221, pp. 1–61.Google Scholar
(2005): Morphological autonomy and diachrony. Yearbook of Morphology, 2004, pp. 137–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009a): From pure phonology to pure morphology. The reshaping of the Romance verb. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes, 381, pp. 45–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009b): Un capitolo di morfologia storica del romeno: preterito i tempi affini. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie, 1251, pp. 273–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012): A paradox? The morphological history of the Romance present subjunctive, in: Gaglia, S. & M.-O. Hinzelin (eds.): Inflection and Word Formation in Romance Languages. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 27–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013): The Latin ‘third stem’ and its Romance descendants. Diachronica, 301, pp. 492–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016a): Morphomes, in: Ledgeway, A. & M. Maiden (eds.): The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 708–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016b): Some lessons from history. Morphomes in diachrony, in: Luís, A. & R. Bermúdez-Otero (eds.): The Morphome Debate. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 33–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018): The Romance Verb. Morphomic structures and diachrony. Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, G. & B. Moulin. (2007): Grammaire provençale et cartes linguistiques, deuxième édition revue et corrigée. Comitat Sestian d’Estudis Occitans, Aix-en-Provence.Google Scholar
Meul, C. (2010): The intra-paradigmatic distribution of the infix -I/ESC- from Latin to Modern Romance: morphomic patterning and beyond. Morphology, 201, pp. 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). The Romance reflexes of the Latin infixes -I/ESC- and -IDI-: restructuring and remodeling processes. Buske, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Milizia, P. (2016): Sincretismo compensativo ed esponenza semiseparata in alcuni paradigmi verbali del dominio italo-romanzo centromeridionale. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, 101, 1, pp. 88–119.Google Scholar
Moll, F. de B. (2006): Gramàtica històrica catalana. València: Universitat de València.Google Scholar
O’Neill, P. (2014): The morphome in constructive and abstractive models of morphology. Morphology, 241, pp. 25–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quint, N. (ms.): Azérables: morphologie verbale. Unpublished fieldwork notes.
Ronjat, J. (1937): Grammaire istorique des parlers provençaux modernes, vol. III. Société des Langues Romanes, Montpellier.Google Scholar
Round, E. R. (2015): Rhizomorphomes, meromorphomes, and metamorphomes, in: Baerman, M., D. Brown & G. Corbett (eds.): Understanding and measuring morphological complexity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 29–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Savinian [= Lhermitte, J.] (1978 [1882]): Grammaire provençale: précis historique de la langue d’oc. Marcel Petit, Raphèle-lès-Arles.Google Scholar
Sibille, J. (2015): Description de l’occitan parlé à Sénaillac-Lauzès (Lot) et dans les communes voisines. Lambert Lucas, Limoges.Google Scholar
Smith, J. C. (2013): The morphome as a gradient phenomenon: Evidence from Romance, in: Cruschina, S., M. Maiden & J. C. Smith (eds.): The Boundaries of Pure Morphology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 247–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, G. (2016): Inflectional paradigms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, G. & R. Finkel. (2013): Morphological typology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, M. (1993): Changing inflection: verbs in North West Catalan, in: Mackenzie, D. & I. Michael (eds.): Hispanic Linguistic Studies in honour of F. W. Hodcraft. Dolphin, Llangrannog, pp. 171–206.Google Scholar
(2011): The Evolution of a Morphome in Catalan Verb Inflection, in: Maiden, M., J. C. Smith, M. Goldbach & M.-O. Hinzelin (eds.): Morphological Autonomy. Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 183–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, M., A. Yates & N. Dols. (1999): Catalan: a comprehensive grammar. Routledge, London. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

ESHER, LOUISE
2024. The intricate inflectional relationships underpinning morphological analogy. Journal of Linguistics 60:2 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Herce, Borja & Bogdan Pricop
2024. VeLeRo: an inflected verbal lexicon of standard Romanian and a quantitative analysis of morphological predictability. Language Resources and Evaluation DOI logo
Kasstan, Jonathan R.
2022. A variationist analysis of the subjunctive mood in a sociolinguistic corpus of spoken Francoprovençal. Linx :84 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.