Article published in:
Revue Romane
Vol. 57:2 (2022) ► pp. 265287
References

Referências

Battye, A. & I. Roberts
(1995): Introduction, in: Battye, A. & I. Roberts. (orgs.): Clause Structure and Language Change. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 3–28.Google Scholar
Bilodeau-Mercure, M. & P. Tremblay
(2016): Age Differences in Sequential Speech Production: Articulatory and Physiological Factors. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 64(11), pp. e177–e182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. & R. Torres Cacoullos
(2008): Phonological and Grammatical Variation in Exemplar Models. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 1(2), pp. 399–413. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cappellaro, C.
(2013): Overabundance in diachrony: a case study, in: Cruschina, S., M. Maiden & J.Ch. Smith. (orgs.): The Boundaries of Pure Morphology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 209–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casali, R. F.
(2011): Hiatus Resolution, in: van Oostendorp, M., C. J. Ewen, E. Hume, & K. Rice. (orgs.): The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Vol. 31: Phonological Processes. Willey–Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp. 1434–1460. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collischonn, G. & L. W. Wetzels
(2016): Syllable Structure, in: Wetzels, L. W., S. Menuzzi & J. Costa. (orgs.): The Handbook of Portuguese Linguistics. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, pp. 86–106.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. G.
(2005): The canonical approach in typology, in: Frajzyngier, Z., A. Hodges & D. S. Rood. (orgs.): Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories. John Benjamins, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, pp. 25–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007): Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words. Language 83(1), pp. 8–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Freitas, M. J.
(2017): Aquisição da fonologia em língua materna: a sílaba, in: Freitas, M. J. & A. L. Santos. (orgs.): Aquisição de língua materna e não materna: Questões gerais e dados do português (Textbooks in Language Sciences 3). Language Science Press, Berlin, pp. 71–94.Google Scholar
Galves, C., H. Britto, H. & M. C. Paixão de Sousa
(2005): The Change in Clitic Placement from Classical to Modern European Portuguese: Results from the Tycho Brahe Corpus. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 4(1), pp. 39–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, E. & A. P. Versloot
(2019): Factors promoting the retention of irregularity. On the interplay of salience, absolute frequency and proportional frequency in West Frisian plural morphology, Morphology, 291, pp. 31–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiefer, F.
(1998): Morphology and Pragmatics, in: Spencer, A. & A. M. Zwicky (orgs.): The Handbook of morphology. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford-Malden, pp. 272–279.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D.
(1979): Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Maia, C. de Azevedo
(1986): História do Galego-Português. Estado linguistico da Galiza e do Noroeste de Portugal desde o século XIII ao século XVI ( Com referência à situação do galego moderno ). Instituto Nacional de Investigação Científica, Coimbra.Google Scholar
Martins, A. M.
(1994): Clíticos na História do Português. Tese de Doutoramento. Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, E.
(2014): Introduction, in: MacWhinney, B., A. Malchukov & E. Moravcsik. (orgs.): Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nkollo, M.
(2020): Onset insertion across words in present-day dialectal EP. A case for competing grammars? Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, XVIII n°2 (36), pp. 281–307.Google Scholar
(2021): Padrões de não-adjacência clítico-verbo no português clássico. A sintaxe nas interfaces com a fonologia, in: Schøsler, L., J. Härmä & J. Lindschouw. (orgs.): Actes du XXIXe Congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes (Copenhague, 1–6 Juillet 2019). Vol. 11 Editions de Linguistique et de Philologie, Strasbourg, pp. 479–490.Google Scholar
Oliveira, P., M. Cruz, N. Paulino & M. Vigário
(2017): Glide insertion to break a hiatus across words in European Portuguese. The role of prosodic, geographic and sociolinguistic factors, in: Barbosa, P., M. da Conceição de Paiva & C. Rodrigues. (orgs.): Studies on Variation in Portuguese. John Benjamins, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, pp. 49–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Neil, P.
(2018): Roots, endings and clashes of morphomes, in: Bouzouita, M., I. Sitaridou & E. Pato. (orgs.): Studies in Historical Ibero-Romance Morpho-Syntax. John Benhamins, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, pp. 13–46.Google Scholar
Roberts, I.
(2007): Diachronic Syntax. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sampson, R.
(2016): Sandhi phenomena, in: Ledgeway, A. & M. Maiden. (orgs.): The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 669–680. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, A.
(2011): Overabundance (Multiple Forms Realizing the Same Cell): A Non-Canonical Phenomenon in Italian Verb Morphology, in: Maiden, M., J.-Ch. Smith, M. Goldbach & M. -O. Hinzelin. (orgs.): Morphological Autonomy. Perspectives From Romance Inflectional Morphology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 358–381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vigário, M.
(2003) The Prosodic Word in European Portuguese. De Gruyter, Berlin-New York. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Villalva, A.
(2007) Morfologia do Português. Universidade Aberta, Lisboa.Google Scholar

Corpora

Martins, A. M.
(coord.) (2010) CORDIAL-SIN: Syntax-oriented Corpus of Portuguese Dialects. Lisboa: Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa. Disponível em http://​www​.clul​.ul​.pt​/en​/resources​/411​-cordial​-corpus. [Consulta: 24/10/2020].
Xavier, M. F.
(coord.) (1998) CIPM: Corpus Informatizado do Português Medieval. Lisboa: Centro de Linguística da Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Disponível em http://​cipm​.fcsh​.unl​.pt/. [Consulta: 16/10/2020].
Artigos definidos variáveis no português europeu dialetal