Article published In:
Revue Romane
Vol. 58:2 (2023) ► pp.317337
References

Bibliografia

Alfonzetti, G.
(1992): Il discorso bilingue. Italiano e dialetto a Catania. Franco Angeli, Milano.Google Scholar
Andorno, C.
(2003): Linguistica testuale. Un’introduzione. Carocci, Roma.Google Scholar
(1999) Avverbi focalizzanti in italiano. Parametri per un’analisi. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata, 28(1), 43–83.Google Scholar
Auer, P.
(1988): A conversation analytic approach to code-switching and transfer, in Heller, M. (a c. di): Codeswitching: Anthropological and sociolinguistic perspectives. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 187–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999): From code switching via language mixing to fused lects. Toward a dynamic typology of bilingual speech. International Journal of Bilingualism, 3, 4, pp. 309–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazzanella, C.
(1985): L’uso dei connettivi nel parlato: alcune proposte, in Franchi De Bellis, A. e L. M. Savoia (a c. di): Sintassi e morfologia della lingua italiana d’uso. Teorie e applicazioni descrittive, Bulzoni, Roma, pp. 83–94.Google Scholar
(1990): Phatic connectives as interactional cues in contemporary spoken Italian. Journal of Pragmatics, 141, pp. 629–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994): Le facce del parlare. Un approccio pragmatico all’italiano parlato. La Nuova Italia, Firenze.Google Scholar
Beeching, K. e Detges, U.
(2014): Introduction, in Beeching, K. e U. Detges (a c. di): Discourse functions at the left and right periphery. Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change. Brill, Leiden, pp. 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertinetto, P. M.
(1986): Tempo, aspetto e azione nel verbo italiano. Il sistema dell’indicativo. Accademia della Crusca, Firenze.Google Scholar
Clift, R.
(2016): Conversation Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. e Ono, T.
(2007): ‘Incrementing’ in conversation. A comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese. Pragmatics, 17, 4, pp. 513–552.Google Scholar
Curl, T. S.
(2006): Offers of assistance: Constraints on syntactic design. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 8, pp. 1257–1280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fedriani, C., e Ghezzi, C.
(2014): The pragmaticalization of verbs of movement and exchange in Latin and Italian: Paths of development from lexicon to pragmatics, in Ilona, B. e M. Popescu (a c. di): Studia Linguistica et Philologica: in Honorem Prof. Univ. Dr. Michaela Liviescu. Editura Universitaria, Craiova, pp. 116–139.Google Scholar
Fedriani, C. e Molinelli, P.
(2019) Italian ma ‘but’ in deverbal pragmatic markers: Forms, functions, and productivity of a pragma-dyad. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana, 261, 29–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fele, G.
(2007): L’analisi della conversazione. Il Mulino, Bologna.Google Scholar
Fischer, K.
(2006): Towards an understanding of the spectrum of approaches to discourse particles: introduction to the volume, in Fischer, K. (a c. di): Approaches to discourse particles. Elsevier, Oxford – Amsterdam, pp. 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B.
(2009): An approach to discourse markers. International Review of Pragmatics, 11, pp. 293–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H.
(1964): Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities. Social Problems, 11 (3), pp. 225–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghezzi, C. e Molinelli, P.
(2014): Italian guarda, prego, dai. Pragmatic markers and the left and right periphery, in Beeching, Kate e U. Detges (a c. di): Discourse functions at the left and right periphery. Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change. Brill, Leiden, pp. 117–150.Google Scholar
Glenn, P.
(2003): Laughter in interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1959): The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
(1967): Interaction ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior. Anchor Books, New York.Google Scholar
Heritage, J.
(1984): Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
(2013): Epistemics in conversation, in Sidnell, J. e T. Stivers (a c. di): The handbook of conversation analysis. Blackwell, West Sussex, pp. 370–394.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., e Sorjonen, M-L.
(2018): Introduction: Analyzing turn-initial particles, in Heritage, J. e M-L. Sorjonen (a c. di): Between turn and sequence: Turn-initial particles across languages. John Benjamins, Amsterdam / Philadelphia, pp. 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ISTAT
(2017) L’uso della lingua italiana, dei dialetti e di altre lingue in Italia. [URL] (ultimo accesso: 4 luglio 2022).
Jefferson, G.
(2004): Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction, in Lerner, G. (a c. di): Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. John Benjamins, Amsterdam / Philadelphia, pp. 13–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, K. H. e Drew, P.
(2016): Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 491, pp. 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. e Fanshel, D.
(1977): Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.
(2012): Action formation and ascription, in Sidnell, J. e T. Stivers (a c. di): The handbook of conversation analysis. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 103–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molinelli, P.
(2017): Segnali discorsivi e segnali pragmatici: Sensibilità al mutamento e alla variazione sociolinguistica. Linguistica e Filologia, 371, pp. 121–154.Google Scholar
Pauletto, F.,e Fatigante, M.
(2015) ‘Dai da’ na mano!’ Tra il dire e il chiedere. L’uso del segnale discorsivo ‘dai’ in conversazioni in famiglia>. Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata, XV(1), 89–94.Google Scholar
Poggi, I.
(2009): The language of interjections, in Esposito, A., A. Hussain, M. Marinaro e R. Martone (a c. di): Multimodal signals: Cognitive and algorithmic issues. Springer, Berlin, pp. 170–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poletto, C.
(1993): La sintassi del soggetto nei dialetti italiani settentrionali. Unipress, Padova.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. e Heritage, J.
(2013): Preference, in Sidnell, J. e T. Stivers (a c. di): The handbook of conversation analysis. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 210–228.Google Scholar
Raymond, J. e Zimmerman, D. H.
(2007): Rights and responsibilities in calls for help: The case of the Mountain Glade fire. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40, 1, pp. 33–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1992): Lectures on conversation, Vols. 1 & 2, edited by Gail Jefferson. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. e Jefferson, G.
(1974): A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 4, pp. 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sansò, A.
(2020): I segnali discorsivi. Carocci, Roma.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
(1968): Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 701, pp. 1075–1095. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1986): The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 91, pp. 111–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007): Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in Conversation Analysis. Volume 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scivoletto, G.
(2020): “Arà, che si dice?” Marcatori del discorso in Sicilia. Centro di studi filologici e linguistici siciliani, Palermo.Google Scholar
Sterponi, L.
(2009): Accountability in family discourse: Socialization into norms and standards and negotiation of responsibility in Italian dinner conversations. Childhood, 16, 4, pp. 441–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, M. e Peräkylä, A.
(2012): Deontic authority in interaction: The right to announce, propose, and decide. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 3, pp. 297–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stolz, T.
(2018): (Non-)Canonical reduplication, in Urdze, Aina (a c. di): Non-prototypical reduplication. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 201–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. A., Fox, B. A., e Couper-Kuhlen, E.
(2015): Responses in request-for-action sequences, in Thompson, S. A., B. A. Fox e E. Couper-Kuhlen (a c. di): Grammar in everyday talk: Building responsive actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 215–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar