Cover not available
Article published In:
Revue Romane
Vol. 50:1 (2015) ► pp.114–151

Avant que : une conjonction à tout faire (ou presque)

| CNRS & Universite de Toulouse-Le Mirail

This study aims at exploring the various semantic effects of the French temporal conjunction avant que (“before”). It shows how avant que, as a simple marker of anteriority, reacts to its linguistic context in such a way that new meanings emerge, which cannot be directly attributed to the conjunction. Via a presuppositional analysis that takes into account factual as well as “counterfactual” or “suspensive” readings of avant que, and through numerous attested examples, it reveals the mechanisms which are responsible for generating specific semantic effects. These effects are divided into three major categories, ranging from preventing (avant que P as “in order that not P” or “in such a way that not P”) to allowing (avant que P as “in order that P”), or deliberating (avant que P as “in order to decide if P”).

Keywords: avant que (‘before’), viewpoint, semantic effects, presupposition, anteriority, temporal subordination, intention

Article language: French

Published online: 10 September 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.50.1.07dra
References
Anscombe, G.E.M
(1964) : Before and after. The Philosophical Review, 741, pp. 3–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Banfield, A
(1979) : Où l’épistémologie, le style et la grammaire rencontrent la théorie littéraire. Langue française, 441, pp. 9–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beaver, D., & C. Condoravdi
(2003) : A uniform analysis of before and after , In : Young, R. & Y. Zhou (éds.): Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 13, CLC Publications, Cornell University, Ithaca/New-York, pp. 37–54.Google Scholar
Berthonneau, A.-M
(1987) : La Thématisation et les compléments temporels. Travaux de linguistique, 14,15, pp. 67–81.Google Scholar
Borillo, A
(1996) : Les relations temporelles entre phrases : subordination ou parataxe ?, In : Muller, C. (éd.) : Dépendance et Intégration syntaxique : subordination, coordination, connexion. Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 127–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E
(2009) : First language acquisition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2nd edition. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Cornulier, B
(1985) : Effets de sens. Éditions de Minuit, Paris.Google Scholar
Ducrot, O
(1984) : Le Dire et le dit. Éditions de Minuit, Paris.Google Scholar
(1991) : Dire et ne pas dire. Hermann, Paris (troisième édition corrigée et augmentée).Google Scholar
Ducrot, O., J.-M. Schaeffer
(1995) : Nouveau Dictionnaire Encyclopédique des Sciences du Langage. Éditions du Seuil, Paris.Google Scholar
Franckel, J.-J
(1989) : Étude de quelques marqueurs aspectuels du français. Droz, Genève/Paris.Google Scholar
Frege, G
(1892) : Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100. Traduction française de 1971 (au chapitre « Sens et dénotation ») : Ecrits logiques et philosophiques . Éditions du Seuil, Paris, pp. 102–126.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G
(1979) : Pragmatics. New York Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, A
(2002) : Until, aspect, and negation : a novel argument for two untils , In : Brendan, J. (éd.): Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 12, CLC Publications, Cornell University, Ithaca/New-York, pp. 84–103.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P
(1975) : Logic and conversation, In: Cole, P. & J. Morgan (éds.) : Syntax and semantics. vol III1, Academic Press, New York, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
Hamann, C
(1989) : English temporal Clauses in a Reference Frame Model, In : Schopf, A. (éd.) : Time, text and modality. Essays on Tensing in English, Vol. II1, Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 31–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heinämäki, O.T
(1972) : Before. Papers from the eighth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 139–151.Google Scholar
(1974) : Semantics of English temporal connectives. Ph.D Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
Lakoff, G
(1971) : Linguistics and natural logic. Synthese, 221, pp. 151–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Draoulec, A
(1997) : Etude présuppositionnelle des subordonnées temporelles. Thèse de sciences du langage, Université de Toulouse - Le Mirail.Google Scholar
(2005) : Avant que / de : possibles passages à la connexion temporelle. Journal of French Language Studies, 151, pp. 131–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006a) : De la subordination à la connexion temporelle. Cahiers Chronos, 151, pp. 39–62.Google Scholar
(2006b) : Avant que- or Avant de- Clauses: When Presupposition Gives Way to an ‘Assertive Construction’ », In : Nishida, Ch. & J.-P. Montreuil (éds.): Morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. New perspectives on romance linguistics, I voll.1, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp. 155–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) : « Il retombe puis rebondit avant de retomber à nouveau… » : puis et avant que dans la progression narrative, In : Birkelund, M., M.-B. Mosegaard Hansen & C. Norén (éds.) : L’énonciation dans tous ses états, Mélanges offerts à Henning Nølke. Peter Lang, Berne, pp. 403–432.Google Scholar
Lewis, D
(1979) : Scorekeeping in a Language Game, In : Bäuerle, R., U. Egli & A. von Stechow (éds.): Semantics from different points of view, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 172–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, R
(1983) : Pour une logique du sens. PUF, Paris.Google Scholar
Ogihara, T
(1995) : Non-factual before and adverbs ofquantification, In : T. Galloway & M. Simons (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 5, DMLL Publications, Cornell University, Ithaca/New York, pp. 273–291.Google Scholar
Russell, B
(1905) : On Denoting. Mind, 141, pp. 479–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P.F
(1950) : On Referring. Mind, 591. Traduction française de 1977 (au chapitre « De l’acte de référence ») : Études de logique et de linguistique. Éditions du Seuil, Paris, pp. 9–38.Google Scholar
(1964) : Identifying Reference and Truth Values. Theoria, 301. Traduction française de 1977 (au chapitre « Référence identifiante et valeurs de vérité ») : Études de logique et de linguistique. Éditions du Seuil, Paris, pp. 91–113.Google Scholar
Tedeschi, P
(1981) : Some evidence for a branching-futures model. Syntax and Semantics, 141, New York Academic Press, New-York, pp. 239–269.Google Scholar
Tenbrink, T
(2007) : Imposing common ground by using temporal connectives: The pragmatics of before and after , In : A. Fetzer & Fischer, K. (éds.): Lexical markers of common grounds, Elsevier, pp. 113–139.Google Scholar
Tovena, Lucia
(1995) : When negation meets a temporal connective, In : Amsili, P., M. Borillo & L. Vieu (éds.) : Proceedings of the Workshop on time, space, and movement, Université de Paul Sabatier, pp. 41–44.Google Scholar
Vet, C
(1991) : Tense and time adverbials : Reference vs perspective in discourse, In : Kas, M., E. Neuland & C. Vet (éds.): Language and cognition, vol. I1. University of Groningen, pp. 265–279.Google Scholar
Vogeleer, Svetlana
(2000) : Intentional relation and suspended reading of “before” clauses: the case of the French avant que . Linguistics, 38,5, pp. 1015–1051. DOI logoGoogle Scholar