Cover not available
Article published In:
Revue Romane
Vol. 50:2 (2015) ► pp.163–190

Direccionales con con y Marcado Diferencial de Objeto

| University of Tromsø -The Arctic University of Norway

An understudied property of Spanish grammar is the possibility of obtaining a directional reading with a PP introduced by con ‘with’, as in Ven con papá ‘Come to daddy’. This work explores this construction taking into account both the properties of the verb and the prepositional phrase, identifying as one of the restrictions that the preposition must in such cases introduce an animate noun; this relates such cases to standard Differential Object Marking (DOM). The proposal, which closely follows the analyses of DOM based on animacy, is that con is able to grammaticalise the [person] property of an animate noun.

Keywords: case, animacy, prepositions, differential object marking, directionals

Article language: Spanish

Published online: 10 March 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.50.2.01fab
References
Arche, M.J
(2006): Individuals in Time: Tense, Aspect and the Individual - Stage Distinction. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bossong, G
(1985): Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den Neuiranischen Sprachen. Gunter Narr Verlag, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Brauns, J
(1909): Über den präpositionalen Accusativ im Spanischen mit gelegentlich Berücksichtigung anderer Sprachen. Gedruckt bei Lütcke & Wulff, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Brucart, J.M
(2010): La alternancia ser y estar y las construcciones atributivas de localización. En: Avellana, A. (ed.): Actas del V Encuentro de Gramática Generativa. Editorial Universitaria del Comahue, Neuquén, pp. 115–152.Google Scholar
(2012): Copular alternations in Spanish and Catalan attributive sentences. Linguística: Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto, 71, pp. 9–43.Google Scholar
Company, Concepción
(2002): El avance diacrónico de la marcación preposicional en objetos directos animados. En: Torres, J.C. et al. (ed.): Actas del ii csel. presente y futuro de la lingüística. CSIC, Madrid, pp. 146–154.Google Scholar
Cuyckens, H
(2002): Metonymy in prepositions. En: Cuyckens, H. & G. Radden (eds.): Perspectives on Prepositions. Niemeyer, Tubingen, pp. 257–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cuyper, G
(2004): La estructura léxica de la resultatividad y su expresión en las lenguas germánicas y románicas. Universiteit Antwerpen Ph. D. dissertation, Antwerpen.Google Scholar
De Miguel, E
(1992): El aspecto en la sintaxis del español: perfectividad e impersonalidad. Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid.Google Scholar
De Miguel, E. y M. Fernández-Lagunilla
(2000): El operador aspectual se . Revista española de lingüística, 30(1), pp. 13–43.Google Scholar
Delbecque, N
(1998): Why Spanish has two transitive construciton frames. Leuvense Bijdragen, 871, pp. 387–415.Google Scholar
(1999): Two transitive construction frames in Spanish: the prepositional and the non-prepositional accusative. En: De Stadler, L. y C. Eyrich (eds.): Issues in Cognitive linguistics. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 407–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002): A construction grammar approach to transitivity in Spanish. En: Davidse, K. y B. Lamiroy (eds.): The Nominative and Accusative and their Counterparts. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 81–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diez, F
(1844): Grammatik der romanischen Sprache. E. Webber, Bonn.Google Scholar
Enghels, R
(2013): Transitivity of Spanish perception verbs: A gradual category. Borealis. An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 2(1), pp. 35–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, A
(2007): An exhaustive lexicalization account of directional complements. En: Bašić, M., M. Pantcheva, M. Son y P. Svenonius (eds.): Tromsø working papers on language and linguistics: Nordlyd 34.2, Special issue on Space, Motion, and Result. University of Tromsø, Tromsø, pp. 165–199. Available at [URL].Google Scholar
Hale, K
(1986): Notes on world view and semantic categories: Some Warlpiri examples. En: Muysken, P. y H. van Riemsdijk (eds.): Features and Projections. Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 233–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, K. y S.J. Keyser
(2002): Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 39). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, H
(1995): Subjects, Events, and Licensing. MIT dissertation, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hills, E.C
(1920): The accusative a . Hispania, 31, pp. 216–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I
(2003): Entering in Spanish. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 29–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iemmolo, G
(2013): Topicality and Differential Object Marking: Evidence from Romance and Beyond. University of Zurich.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R
(1990): Semantic structures. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Joly, A
(1971): La complément verbal et le morphème a en béarnais. observations sur le genre et la fonction dans les langues romanes. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 871, pp. 286–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kita, S
(1999): Japanese enter / exit verbs without motion semantics. Studies in Language, 231, pp. 307–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonetti, M
(2004): Specificity and differential object marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 31, pp. 75–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López, L
(2012): Indefinite objects: scrambling, choice functions and differential marking, vol. 631 Linguistic Inquiry Monographs. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marantz, A
(1991): Case and licensing. En Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, vol. 81, pp. 234–253. MIT.Google Scholar
Mateu, J
(2002): Argument structure: Relational Construal at the Syntax Interface. Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona dissertation, Barcelona.Google Scholar
Morera Pérez, M
(1988): Estructura semántica del sistema preposicional del español moderno y sus campos de uso. Puerto del Rosario, Cabildo Insular de Fuerteventura.Google Scholar
Morimoto, Y
(2001): Los verbos de movimiento. Visor, Madrid.Google Scholar
Pottier, B
(1968) L’emploi de la préposition a devant l’object en espagnol. Bulletin de la Societé de Linguistique, 11, pp. 83–95.Google Scholar
Ramchand, G
(2008): Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, T
en prensa): Central coincidence: The preposition with . En: Merle, J.-M. y A. Steuckardt (eds.) Prépositions et aspectualité Ophrys Paris DOI logo
Real Academia Española y Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española
(2009): Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Espasa Calpe, Madrid.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M
(2007) The Syntax of Objects: Agree and Differential Object Marking. University of Connecticut Ph. D. dissertation, Storrs.Google Scholar
Romeu, J
(2013): Locations and Paths: The Structure of Prepositions in a Minimal Cartography. CSIC Ph. D. dissertation, Madrid.Google Scholar
Svenonius, P
(2010): Spatial prepositions in English. En: Cinque, G. & L. Rizzi (eds.): Mapping Spatial PPs: Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 61. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 127–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L
(1983): How language structures space. En: Pick, H. y L. Acredolo (eds.): Spatial orientation: Theory, Research, and Application. Plenum, New York, pp. 225–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1985): Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. En Shopen, T. (ed.): Language Typology and Syntactic Description, iii: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 57–149.Google Scholar
(1991): Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. En Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society . Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA, pp. 480–519.
Todolí, J
(2008): Els pronoms. En: Joan Solá, J.M., M-R. Lloret y M.P. Saldanya (eds.): Gramàtica del catalá contemporani, vol. 21, cap. 6. Empúries edició definitiva edn, Barcelon, pp. 1337–1433.Google Scholar
Torrego, E
(1998): The Dependencies of Objects. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 34. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vergnaud, J.-R
([1977] 2008): Letter to Noam Chomsky and Howard Lasnik on “Filters and control”. En: Freidin, R., C.P. Otero y M.L. Zubizarreta (eds.): Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
Von Heusinger, K. y G.A. Kaiser
(2011): Affectedness and differential object marking in Spanish. Morphology, 21(1), pp. 593–617. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Franco, Ludovico, M. Rita Manzini & Leonardo M. Savoia
2021. Locative Ps as general relators. Linguistic Variation 21:1 ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Ormazabal, Javier & Juan Romero
2019. Prolegomena to the study of object relations. Lingvisticae Investigationes 42:1 ► pp. 102 ff. DOI logo
Tapia, Jaime M., Jesús Muñoz, Felisa González, María L. Blázquez & Antonio Ballester
2016. Sorption of ferrous iron by EPS from the acidophilic bacterium <em>Acidiphilium</em> Sp.: A mechanism proposal. Revista de Metalurgia 52:3 ► pp. e076 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.