Article published In:
Revue Romane
Vol. 51:2 (2016) ► pp.271306
References
ALLOc = Ravier, X
(1978–1993) : Atlas linguistique et éthnographique du Languedoc occidental. CNRS, Paris.Google Scholar
ALLOr = Boisgontier, J
(1981–1986) : Atlas linguistique et éthnographique du Languedoc oriental. CNRS, Paris.Google Scholar
Ackerman, F., J.P. Blevins & R. Malouf
(2009) : Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms, in : Blevins, J.P. & J. Blevins (eds.): Analogy in grammar. OUP, Oxford, pp. 54–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, F. & R. Malouf
(2013) : Morphological organization: The low conditional entropy conjecture. Language, 891, pp. 429–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ademá Mora, C
(1966) : Estudio sobre el dialecto aranés. Editorial Occitania, Barcelona.Google Scholar
Albright, A
(2009) : Modeling analogy as probabilistic grammar, in : Blevins, J.P. & J. Blevins (eds.): Analogy in grammar. OUP, Oxford, pp. 185–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alibèrt, L
(1976) : Gramatica occitana segon los parlars lengadocians. Segonda edicion. CEO, Montpelhièr.Google Scholar
Anglade, J
(1919) : Las Leys d’Amors. Manuscrit de l’Académie des Jeux Floraux. Privat, Toulouse.Google Scholar
Aronoff, M
(1994) : Morphology by itself. Stems and inflectional classes. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Bach, X. & L. Esher
(2015) : Morphological evidence for the paradigmatic status of infinitives in French and Occitan, in : Haug, D.T.T. (ed.) : Historical Linguistics 2013. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 135–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bec, P
(1968) : Les interférences linguistiques entre gascon et languedocien dans les parlers du Comminges et du Couserans. PUF, Paris.Google Scholar
Bianco, G., F. Bronzati, J.-M. Effantin, P. Martel & R. PellerinoComission internacionala per la normalizacion linguística de l’occitan alpin
[] (2008) : Nòrmas ortograficas, chausias morfològicas e vocabulari de l’occitan alpin oriental. Coni, Espaci Occitan Regione Piemonte.Google Scholar
Blinkenberg, A
(1939) : Le Patois d’Entraunes. Munksgaard, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
(1948) : Le Patois de Beuil. Munksgaard, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Brown, D. & A. Hippisley
(2012) : Network morphology. A defaults-based theory of word structure. CUP, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buridant, C
(2000) : Grammaire nouvelle de l’ancien français. SEDES, Paris.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. & M. Brewer
(1980) : Explanation in morphophonemics: Changes in Provençal and Spanish preterite forms. Lingua, 521, pp. 201–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camproux, C
(1962) : Essai de géographie linguistique du Gévaudan. PUF, Montpellier.Google Scholar
Carrera, A
(2007) : Gramatica aranesa. Pagès, Lhèida.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, A
(1994) : Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language, 701, pp. 737–788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casagrande, S
(2011) : L’unité et la diversité des systèmes verbaux en langue d’oc et dans les aires limitrophes. Essai de reconstruction. Doctoral thesis, Université de Nice.Google Scholar
Corbett, G.G. & N.M. Fraser
(1993) : Network morphology: A DATR account of Russian nominal inflection. Journal of Linguistics, 29,1, pp. 113–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coromines, J
(1991) : El parlar de la Vall d’Aran. Gramàtica, diccionari i estudis lexicals sobre el gascó. Curial Edicions Catalanes, Barcelona.Google Scholar
Dalbera, J.-P
(1994) : Les parlers des Alpes-Maritimes : étude comparative, essai de reconstruction. AIEO, London.Google Scholar
Da Tos, M
(2013) : The Italian finire-type verbs: A case of morphomic attraction, in : Cruschina, S., M. Maiden & J. Charles Smith (eds.) : The boundaries of pure morphology. OUP, Oxford, pp. 45–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enger, H.-O
(2012) : Morphological theory and grammaticalisation: The role of meaning and local generalisations. Language Sciences, 361, pp. 18–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) : Reinforcement in inflection classes: Two cues may be better than one. Word Structure, 7,2, pp. 153–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esher, L
(2012a) : Future, conditional and autonomous morphology in Occitan. D. Phil thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
(2012b) : The morphological evolution of infinitive, future and conditional forms in Occitan, in : Kemenade, A. van & N. de Haas (eds.): Historical Linguistics 2009: selected papers from the 19th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 315–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) : Future and conditional in Occitan: A non-canonical morphome, in : Cruschina, S., M. Maiden & J.C. Smith, (eds.) : The boundaries of pure morphology: Diachronic and synchronic perspectives. OUP, Oxford, pp. 95–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fabra, P
(1966) : Gramàtica catalana. Teide, Barcelona.Google Scholar
Grosclaude, M. & G. Nariòo
(1998) : Répertoire des conjugaisons occitanes de Gascogne. Per Noste/La Civada, Ortès.Google Scholar
Jourdan, R
(2009) : Lou Vërnantin/Lo Vernantin. Chambra d’Oc, La Ròcha.Google Scholar
Kirby, S., T. Griffiths & K. Smith
(2014) : Iterated learning and the evolution of language’. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 281, pp. 108–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laurent, J.-P
(2001) : Le Dialecte de la vallée de Massat. J-P Laurent, Montséron.Google Scholar
(2002) : Le Dialecte gascon d’Aulus. J-P Laurent, Montséron.Google Scholar
Lieutard, H
(2004) : Phonologie et morphologie du parler occitan de Graulhet (Tarn). Structure, contenu et rôle de la syllable. CEO/Université Paul Valéry, Montpellier.Google Scholar
Maiden, M
(1995) : A linguistic history of Italian. Longman, London.Google Scholar
(1996) : The romance gerund and system-dependent naturalness in morphology. Transactions of the Philological Society, 941, pp. 167–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) : A strange affinity: Perfecto y tiempos afines. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 581, pp. 441–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) : Verb augments and meaninglessness in Romance morphology. Studi di grammatica italiana, 221, pp. 1–61.Google Scholar
(2005) : Morphological autonomy and diachrony. Yearbook of Morphology, 20041, pp. 137–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009a) : From pure phonology to pure morphology. The reshaping of the Romance verb. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes, 381, pp. 45–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009b) : Where does heteroclisis come from? Evidence from Romanian dialects. Morphology, 191, pp. 59–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011a) : Morphological persistence, in : Maiden, M., J. Charles Smith & A. Ledgeway (eds.): The Cambridge history of the Romance Languages. CUP, Cambridge, pp. 155–215.Google Scholar
(2011b) : Morphophonological innovation, in : Maiden, M., J. Charles Smith & A. Ledgeway (eds.): The Cambridge history of the Romance languages. CUP, Cambridge, pp. 216–267.Google Scholar
(2012) : A paradox? The morphological history of the Romance present subjunctive, in : Gaglia, S. & M.-O. Hinzelin (eds.) : Inflection and word formation in Romance languages. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 27–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) : The Latin ‘third stem’ and its Romance descendants. Diachronica, 301, pp. 492–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) : Some Lessons from History. Morphomes in Diachrony’, in : Luís, A. & R. Bermúdez-Otero (eds.) : The morphome debate: Diagnosing and analysing morphomic patterns. OUP, Oxford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, G. & B. Moulin
(2007) : Grammaire provençale et cartes linguistiques. Deuxième édition revue et corrigée. Comitat Sestian d’Estudis Occitans, Aix-en-Provence.Google Scholar
Maschi, R. & L. Vanelli
(2010) : Morfologia verbale, in : Salvi, G. & L. Renzi (eds.) : Grammatica dell’italiano antico. Vol.II1. il Mulino, Bologna, pp. 1431–1491.Google Scholar
Matthews, P
(2014) : The concise Oxford dictionary of linguistics. OUP, Oxford. (accessed 7 March 2015). Google Scholar
Meul, C
(2010) : The intra-paradigmatic distribution of the infix -I/ESC- from Latin to Modern Romance: Morphomic patterning and beyond. Morphology, 201, pp. 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) : The Romance reflexes of the Latin infixes -I/ESC- and -IDI-: restructuring and remodeling processes. Buske, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Moll, F. de B
(1952) : Gramática histórica catalana. Gredos, Madrid.Google Scholar
Moulin, B
(2006) : Grammaire occitane : le parler bas-vivarois de la région d’Aubenas. IEO, Aubenas.Google Scholar
Nevins, A., C. Rodrigues & K. Tang
(2015) : The rise and fall of the L-shaped morphome: Diachronic and experimental studies. Probus, 27,1, pp. 101–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, P
(2011) : The notion of the morphome, in : Maiden, M., J.C. Smith, M.-O. Hinzelin & M. Goldbach (eds.) : Morphological autonomy: Perspectives from Romance inflectional morphology. OUP, Oxford, pp. 70–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pope, M.K
(1934) : From Latin to Modern French. University of Manchester, Manchester.Google Scholar
Ravier, X
(1970) : Flexion dite inchoative en languedocien ariégeois et fait dialectal. Via Domitia, 161, pp. 17–29.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Castellano, L
(1952) : La varietat dialectal del Alto Aller. Instituto de Estudios Asturianos, Oviedo.Google Scholar
Romieu, M. & A. Bianchi
(2005) : Gramatica de l’occitan gascon contemporanèu. Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Ronjat, J
(1937) : Grammaire istorique des parlers provençaux modernes, vol. III1. Société des Langues Romanes, Montpellier.Google Scholar
Round, E
(2015) : Rhizomorphomes, meromorphomes and metamorphomes, in : Baerman, M., D. Brown & G.G. Corbett (eds.): Understanding and measuring morphological complexity. OUP, Oxford, pp. 29–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roux, J. & J.-L. Lévêque
(2011) : Précis de conjugaison occitane. Dialecte limousin. Novelum/IEO, Périgueux.Google Scholar
Sanchis Guarner, M
(1950) : Gramàtica valenciana. Torre, València.Google Scholar
Skårup, P
(1997) : Morphologie élémentaire de l’ancien occitan. Museum Tusculanum Press, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Stump, G. & R.A. Finkel
(2013) : Morphological typology. From word to Paradigm. CUP, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toscano, R
(1996) : Conjugar en niçard. Auba Novèla, Nice.Google Scholar
(1998) : Gramàtica niçarda. Princi Néguer, Toulouse.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M
(1988) : Occitan, in : Harris, M. & N. Vincent (eds.): The Romance languages. Routledge, London, pp. 246–277.Google Scholar
(2011) : The evolution of a morphome in Catalan verb inflection, in : Maiden, M., J. Charles Smith, M.-O. Hinzelin & M. Goldbach (eds.) : Morphological autonomy: Perspectives from Romance inflectional morphology. OUP, Oxford, pp. 183–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winkelmann, O
(1989) : Untersuchungen zur Sprachvariation des Gaskognischen im Val d’Aran (Zentralpyrenäen). Niemeyer, Tübingen. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Esher, Louise
2021. Les Prétérits nord-occitans à consonne thématique /t/. Revue des langues romanes :Tome CXXV n°1  pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Esher, Louise
2021. Gallo-Romance imperfects betwixt multiple morphomic patterns. Word Structure 14:3  pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
ESHER, LOUISE
2022. The intricate inflectional relationships underpinning morphological analogy. Journal of Linguistics  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Esher, Louise
2022. The historical development of imperfect indicative and conditional inflection in Pyrenean Romance*. Transactions of the Philological Society 120:2  pp. 218 ff. DOI logo
Esher, Louise
2022. Overlapping subjunctive forms in Gallo- and Ibero-Romance verb paradigms. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 57:1  pp. 86 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin
2021. The Morphome. Annual Review of Linguistics 7:1  pp. 89 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.