Article published in:
Revue Romane
Vol. 52:2 (2017) ► pp. 260–281

Les marges de l’homme en jeu aux limbes du Pacifique

| Faculté des Lettres, Université Charles – Prague, République tchèque CEFRES – Prague, République tchèque
The article proposes a new reading of Vendredi ou les limbes du Pacifique with the intent to combine Postcolonial and Animal Studies, beyond the common emphasis on the notion of victim, and to resist the allegorical interpretations of the novel. Firstly, I demonstrate that during the “administrated island”, Robinson imposes an order based on the correlation among capitalism, colonialism and Oedipal sexuality, as if humanity as such could be reduced to the features of Western societies. Then, I explore how the novel relocates the boundaries between the human and the nonhuman, challenging the exclusive identification of alterity to a human face. Finally, I focus on the new relation with otherness (both human and animal) experienced by the two characters: a kind of intersubjectivity based on the play, which is a practice that does not presuppose the knowledge of the other and exceeds the traditional categorical antithesis, such as truth/falsity, good/evil, nature/culture.
Keywords: Tournier, Animal Studies, Postcolonial Studies, play, allegory, alterity


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 08 December 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.52.2.07men

Full-text

Les marges de l’homme en jeu aux limbes du Pacifique
Bibliographie

Bibliographie

Armstrong, Ph
(2002): The Postcolonial Animal. Society and Animals, 10, 4, pp. 413–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008): What Animals Mean in Modern Fiction. Routledge, London-New York.Google Scholar
Attridge, D.
(2004): J. M. Coetzee and the Ethics of Reading. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago-London.Google Scholar
Bhabha, H. K.
(1994): On Mimicry and Man. The Ambivalence of Colonial Discourse, in: Id. The Location of Culture. Routeledge, London-New York, pp. 85–92.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, J.
(1981): Les Bêtes. Territoire et métamorphoses, in: Id. Simulacres et simulation. Galilée, Paris, pp. 187–204.Google Scholar
Berger, J.
(1992): Why Look at Animals, in: Id. About Looking. Vintage, New Yord, pp. 3–28.Google Scholar
Bouloumié, A.
(1988): Michel Tournier. Le roman mythologique. Corti, Paris.Google Scholar
(2010): Le double animal dans l’oeuvre de Michel Tournier, in: Poirier, J. (éd.): L’animal littéraire. Des animaux et des mots. Éditions universitaires de Dijon, Dijon, pp. 109–119.Google Scholar
Bradley, K., P. Cartledge
(éds.) (2001): The Cambridge World History of Slavery. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Caillois, R.
(1958): Les Jeux et les hommes. Gallimard, Paris.Google Scholar
Coetzee, J. M.
(1987): Foe. Penguins Books, London.Google Scholar
[ p. 280 ]
(1999): The Lives of Animals. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Davis, C.
(1988): Michel Tournier. Philosophy and Fiction. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Defoe, D.
(2007): Robinson Crusoe. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G.
(1972): Michel Tournier et le monde sans autrui, in: Tournier, M. Vendredi ou les limbes du Pacifique. Gallimard, Paris, pp. 257–283.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., F. Guattari
(1975): Kafka. Pour une littérature mineure. Les Éditions de Minuit, Paris.Google Scholar
(1980): Mille Plateaux. Capitalisme et schizophrénie. Les Éditions de Minuit, Paris.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., C. Parnet
(1996): L’Abécédaire. Dir. Boutang, P. -A. Vidéo Éditions Montparnasse, France. DVD.Google Scholar
(1996): Dialogues. Flammarion, Paris.Google Scholar
Derrida, J., E. Roudinesco
(2001): De quoi demain. Galilée, Paris.Google Scholar
Derrida, J.
(2006): L’animal que donc je suis. Galilée, Paris.Google Scholar
Engélibert, J. -P.
(1997): La Postérité de Robinson Crusoé. Un mythe littéraire de la modernité 1954–1986. Droz, Genève.Google Scholar
de Fontenay, E.
(1998): Le Silence des bêtes. La philosophie à l’épreuve de l’animalité. Fayard, Paris.Google Scholar
Foucault, M.
(1976): L’Histoire de la sexualité I. La volonté de savoir. Gallimard, Paris.Google Scholar
Gauvin, L.
(1999): La Bibliothèque des Robinson. Études française, XXXV, 1, pp. 79–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guichard, N.
(1989): Michel Tournier, autrui et la quête du Double. Didier, Paris.Google Scholar
Haraway, D.
(2008): When Species Meet. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis-London.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F.
(1939): Phénoménologie de l’esprit. Trad. de Jean Hyppolite. Aubier, Paris.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, L.
(2006): A Theory of Adaptation. Routeledge, London-New York.Google Scholar
Huizinga, J.
(1951): Homo Ludens. Essai sur la fonction sociale du jeu. Gallimard, Paris.Google Scholar
Krell, J.
(1994): Michel Tournier et l’accent grave du jeu. Littérature, 94, pp. 25–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kojève, A.
(1992): Introduction à la lecture de Hegel. Gallimard, Paris [1947].Google Scholar
Kyloušek, P.
(1992): La Mythopoïesis de Michel Tournier. Études Romanes de Brno, XXII, 1, pp. 19–31.Google Scholar
(2004): Le Roman mythologique de Michel Tournier. Masarykova Univerzita v Brně, Brno.Google Scholar
Lehtovuori, E.
(1995): Les voies de Narcisse ou le problème du miroir chez Michel Tournier. Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C.
(1973): Anthropologie structurelle deux. Plon, Paris.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J. -F.
(1984): Le Différend. Éditions de Minuit, Paris.Google Scholar
Petit, S.
(1991): Michel Tournier’s Metaphysical Fictions. John Benjamins, Amsterdam-Philadelphia. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Platten, D.
(1999): Michel Tournier and the Metaphor of Fiction. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poirier, J.
(1985): Approche de… Vendredi ou les limbes du Pacifique. Éd. de l’Aléï.Google Scholar
Ricœur, P.
(2004): Parcours de la reconnaissance. Stock, Paris.Google Scholar
Rivera, A.
(2010): La bella, la bestia e l’umano. Sessismo e razzismo senza escludere lo specismo. Ediesse, Roma.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J.
(2008): Deleuze’s Other-Structure: Beyond the Master-Slave Dialectic, but at What Cost?. Symposium. The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy, 12, 1, pp. 67–88.Google Scholar
[ p. 281 ]
Sankey, M.
(1981): Meaning through Intertextuality: Isomorphism of Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe and Tournier’s Vendredi ou les limbes du Pacifique . Australian Journal of French Studies, XVIII, 1, pp. 77–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salkin Sbiroli, L.
(1987): Michel Tournier: la séduction du jeu. Slatkine, Genève-Paris.Google Scholar
Sartre, J. -P.
(1976): L’Être et le Néant . Essai d’ontologie phénoménologique. Paris: Gallimard, Paris [1943].Google Scholar
Sontag, S.
(2007): Against Intepretation, in Jumonville, N. (éd.): The New York Intellectuals Reader. Routledge, New York, pp. 243–54.Google Scholar
Spiegel, M.
(1996): The Dreaded Comparison: Human and Animal Slavery. Mirror Books, New York.Google Scholar
Spivak, G. C.
(1999): A Critique of Postcolonial Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge-London.Google Scholar
Tournier, M.
(1972): Vendredi ou les limbes du Pacifique. Gallimard, Paris.Google Scholar
(1977): Le Vent paraclet. Gallimard, Paris.Google Scholar
(2012): Michel Tournier se raconte. Les grands entretiens de Bernard Pivot. Gallimard, Institut National de l’Audiovisuel et France 5. Web 27 Fév. 2016.Google Scholar
Young, R.
(2003): Postcolonialism. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zourabichvili, F.
(1997) Qu’est-ce qu’un devenir pour Gilles Deleuze. Conférence prononcée à Lyon, 27 mars 1997. Online: http://​horlieu​-editions​.com​/brochures​/zourabichvili​-qu​-est​-ce​-qu​-un​-devenir​-pour​-gilles​-deleuze​.pdf.