Editorial published In:
Register Studies
Vol. 5:1 (2023) ► pp.122
References
Barbieri, F., & Wizner, S.
(2019) Appendix A: Annotations of major register and genre studies. In D. Biber & S. Conrad (Eds.), Register, genre, and style [2nd edition] (pp. 318–349). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D.
(1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) An analytical framework for register studies. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 31–56). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Register as a predictor of linguistic variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8 (1), 9–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) Text-linguistic approaches to register variation. Register Studies, 1 1, 42–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
(2019) Register, genre, and style (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Egbert, J., & Davies, M.
(2015) Exploring the Composition of the Searchable Web: A Corpus-based Taxonomy of Web Registers. Corpora 10(1), 11–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Egbert, J.
(2018) Register variation online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Egbert, J., & Keller, D.
(2020) Reconceptualizing register in a continuous situational space. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 16 (3), 581–616. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Egbert, J., Keller, D., & Wizner, S.
(2021a) Towards a taxonomy of conversational discourse types: An empirical corpus-based analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 171 1, 20–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., J. Egbert, D. Keller, & S. Wizner
(2021b) Extending text-linguistic studies of register variation to a continuous situational space: Case studies from the web and natural conversation. In E. Seoane & D. Biber (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to register variation (pp. 19–49). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J., & Biber, D.
(2016) Do all roads lead to Rome? Modeling register variation with factor analysis and discriminant analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 14 (2), 233–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Davies, M.
(2015) Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66 (9): 1817–1831. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Gray, B.
(2022) Designing and evaluating language corpora: A practical framework for corpus representativeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J., Wizner, S., Keller, D., Biber, D., McEnery, T., & Baker, P.
(2021) Identifying and describing functional discourse units in the BNC Spoken 2014. Text & Talk, 41 (5–6), 715–737. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J., & Schnur, E.
(2018) The role of the text in corpus and discourse analysis: missing the trees for the forest. In C. Taylor & A. Marchi (Eds.), Corpus approaches to discourse (pp. 159–173). New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C.
(1981) “Foreign talk” as the name of a simplified register. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 28 1, 9–18.Google Scholar
Gray, B., & Egbert, J.
(2019) Register and register variation. Register Studies, 1 (1), 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goulart, L., Gray, B., Staples, S., Black, A., Shelton, A., Biber, D., Egbert, J., & Wizner, S.
(2020) Linguistic perspectives on register. Annual Review of Linguistics, 6 1, 435–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goulart, L., Biber, D., & Reppen, R.
(2022) In this essay, I will…: Examining variation of communicative purpose in university writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 59 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1968) The users and uses of language. In J. F. Fishman (Ed.), Readings in the sociology of language (pp. 139–169). The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988) On the language of physical science. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Registers of written English: Situational factors and linguistic features (pp. 162–178). London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R.
(1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
(1985) Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Victoria: Deakin University.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R.
(2002) Meaning beyond the clause: SFL perspectives. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22 1, 52–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M.
(2019) Register in systemic functional linguistics. Register Studies, 1 (1), 10–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nesi, H., & Gardner, S.
(2012) Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reid, T. B.
(1956) Linguistics, structuralism and philology. Archivum Linguisticum, 81, 28–37.Google Scholar