Article published in:
Register Studies
Vol. 2:1 (2020) ► pp. 131165
References

References

Allison, D., & Tauroza, S.
(1995) The effect of discourse organisation on lecture comprehension. English for Specific Purposes, 14(2), 157–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alsop, S. & Nesi, H.
(2014) The pragmatic annotation of a corpus of academic lectures. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, H. Loftsson, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, A. Moreno, J. Odijk, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Language resources evaluation conference proceedings (pp. 1560–1563). Reykjavik: European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Basturkmen, H.
(2007) Signalling the relationship between ideas in academic speaking: From language description to pedagogy. Prospect: An Australian Journal of TESOL, 22(2), 61–71.Google Scholar
Biber, D.
(1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) University language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Finegan, E.
(Eds.) (1994) Sociolinguistic perspectives on register. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
(2009) Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 161 ]
Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., & Helt, M.
(2002) Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 9–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., Helt, M., Cortes, V., Csomay, E., & Urzua, A.
(2004) Representing language use in the university: Analysis of the TOEFL 2000 spoken and written academic language corpus (TOEFL Monograph series [MS-26]). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Csomay, E., Jones, J. K., & Keck, C.
(2004) A corpus linguistic investigation of vocabulary-based discourse units in university registers. In U. Connor & T. Upton (Eds.), Applied corpus linguistics: A multidimensional perspective (pp. 53–72). Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., U. Connor, E. Csomay, J. K. Jones, C. Keck, & T. Upton
(2007) Introduction to the identification and analysis of vocabulary based discourse units. In D. Biber, U. Connor, & T. Upton. Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. (pp. 155–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Csomay, E.
(2002) Variation in academic lectures: interactivity and level of instruction. In R. Reppen, S. Fitzmaurice, & D. Biber (Eds.), Using corpora to explore linguistic variation. (pp. 203–224). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Linguistic variation within university classroom talk: A corpus-based perspective. Linguistics and Education, 15(3), 243–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Academic talk in American university classrooms: Crossing the boundaries of oral – literate discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 117–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Vocabulary-based discourse units in university class sessions. In D. Biber, U. Connor, & T. Upton, Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure (pp. 213–238). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Lexical bundles in discourse structure: A corpus-based study of classroom discourse. Applied Linguistics, 34(3): 369–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deroey, K. L. B., & Taverniers, M.
(2011) A corpus-based study of lecture functions. Moderna Sprak, 105(2), 1–22.Google Scholar
Dudley-Evans, T.
(1994) Variations in the discourse patterns favoured by different disciplines and their pedagogical implications. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 146–158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, B.
(2015) Linguistic variation in research articles: When discipline tells only part of the story. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hearst, M. A.
(1994) Multi-paragraph segmentation of expository texts ( Technical Report 94/790 ). Berkeley, CA: Computer Science Division (EECS), University of California. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) TextTiling: Segmenting text into multi-paragraph subtopic passages. Computational Linguistics, 23(1), 33–64.Google Scholar
Hoey, M.
(2004) Lexical priming and the properties of text. In A. Partington, J. Morely, & L. Haarman (Eds.), Corpora and discourse (pp. 386–412). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2005) Lexical priming. A new theory of words and language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huebner, T.
(Ed.) (1994) Sociolinguistic perspectives. Papers on language in society 1959–1994. Charles A. Ferguson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 162 ]
Hyland, K.
(2006) Disciplinary differences: Language variation in academic discourses. In K. Hyland & M. Bondi (Eds.), Academic discourse across disciplines. (pp. 17–45). Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D.
(1962) The ethnography of speaking. In T. Gladwin & W. C. Sturtevant (Eds.), Anthropology and human behavior (pp. 13–53). Washington, DC: Anthropology Society of Washington.Google Scholar
(1972) Toward ethnographies of communication. In P. P. Giglioli (Ed.), Language and social context (pp. 21–44). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
(1974) Foundations of sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Nattinger, J. R. & DeCarrico, J.
(1992) Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nesi, H.
(2001) A corpus-based analysis of academic lectures across disciplines. In J. Cotterill, & A. E. Ife (Eds.), Language across boundaries: Selected papers from the annual meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics held at Anglia Polytechnic University (pp. 201–218). Cambridge, September 2000.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, M. B., Scott, M., Mahlberg, M., & Hoey, M.
(2012) Exploring text-initial words, clusters and congrams. In E. Csomay (Ed.), Discourse and corpora. Special issue of Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8(1), 73–102.Google Scholar
Olsen, L. A., & Huckin, T. H.
(1990) Point-driven understanding in engineering lecture comprehension. English for Specific Purposes, 9(1), 33–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prince, E.
(1981) Toward a taxonomy of given/new information. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, S.
(2003) Text-structuring metadiscourse, intonation and the signalling of organization in academic lectures. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 5–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P., & Nesi, H.
(2001) The British Academic Spoken English (BASE) corpus project. Language Teaching Research, 5(3), 263–264.Google Scholar
Youmans, G.
(1991) A new tool for discourse analysis: The Vocabulary Management Profile. Language, 67, 763–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Young, L.
(1994) University lectures – macro-structure and micro-features. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 159–176). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar