Article published in:
Register Studies
Vol. 1:2 (2019) ► pp. 243268
References
Ädel, A.
(2006) Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Involvement features in writing: Do time and interaction trump register awareness? In G. Gilquin, S. Papp, & M. B. Díez-Bedmar (Eds.), Linking up contrastive and learner corpus research (pp. 35–53). Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Altenberg, B., & Tapper, M.
(1998) The use of adverbial connectors in advanced Swedish learners’ written English. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on computer (pp. 80–93). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Baayen, H.
(2008) Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
British Academic Written English (BAWE)
. Corpus compiled at the Universities of Warwick, Reading and Oxford Brookes in 2004–2007http://​www2​.warwick​.ac​.uk​/fac​/soc​/al​/research​/collect​/bawe/
Biber, D.
(1995) Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006a) Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 97–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006b) University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
(2009) Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Egbert, J., & Zhang, M.
(2018) Lexis and grammar as complementary discourse systems for expressing stance and evaluation. In M. Gómez González & J. L. Mackenzie (Eds.), The construction of discourse as verbal interaction (pp. 201–226). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Zhang, M.
(2018) Expressing evaluation without grammatical stance: Informational persuasion on the web. Corpora, 13(1), 97–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burnard, L.
(2007) Reference guide for the British National Corpus (XML edition). http://​www​.natcorp​.ox​.ac​.uk​/docs​/URG/
Callies, M.
(2013) Agentivity as a determinant of lexico-grammatical variation in L2 academic writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(3), 357–390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charles, M.
(2006) Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 310–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
(2001) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning teaching assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, M.
(2008) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 520 Million Words, 1990-present. http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coca/
Fox, J., & Hong, J.
(2009) Effect displays in R for multinomial and proportional-odds logit models: Extensions to the effects package. Journal of Statistical Software, 32(1), 1–24. http://​www​.jstatsoft​.org​/v32​/i01/
Glynn, D.
(2014) Correspondence analysis: An exploratory technique for identifying usage patterns. In D. Glynn & J. A. Robinson (Eds.), Corpus methods in cognitive semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy (pp. 443–485). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gray, B., & Biber, D.
(2012) Current conceptions of stance. In K. Hyland & C. S. Guinda (Eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp. 15–33). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Groom, N.
(2005) Pattern and meaning across genres and disciplines: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(3), 257–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1994) An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hasselgård, H.
(2015) Lexicogrammatical features of adverbs in advanced learner English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 166(1), 163–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herriman, J., & Boström Aronsson, M.
(2009) Themes in Swedish advanced learners’ writing in English. In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora and language teaching (pp. 101–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hewings, M., & Hewings, A.
(2002) ’It is interesting to note that…’: A comparative study of anticipatory ‘it’ in student and published writing. English for Specific Purposes, 21(4), 367–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinkel, E.
(2005) Hedging, inflating and persuading in L2 academic writing. Applied Language Learning, 151, 29–53.Google Scholar
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G.
(Eds.) (2000) Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, K.
(1996) Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication, 13(2), 251–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaatari, H.
(2017) Adjectives complemented by that- and to-clauses: Exploring semantico-syntactic relationships and genre variation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Larsson, T.
(2014) Introducing the Advanced Learner English Corpus (ALEC): A new learner corpus. Poster presented at the 2014 LOT Winter School, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 20 January 2014.Google Scholar
(2016) The introductory it pattern: Variability explored in learner and expert writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 221, 64–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017a)  The importance of, it is important that or importantly? The use of morphologically related stance markers in learner and expert writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(1), 57–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017b) A functional classification of the introductory it pattern: Investigating academic writing by non-native-speaker and native-speaker students. English for Specific Purposes, 481, 57–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Is there a correlation between form and function? A syntactic and functional investigation of the introductory it pattern in student writing. ICAME Journal, 42(1), 13–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, T. & Kaatari, H.
(2019) Extraposition in learner and expert writing: Exploring (in)formality and the impact of register. International Journal of Learner Corpus Linguistics, 5(1), 33–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Le, S., Josse, J., & Husson, F.
(2008) FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(1), 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D.
(2001) Genres, registers, text-types, domains, and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning and Technology, 5(3), 37–72.Google Scholar
Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP)
. Ann Arbor: The Regents of the University of Michigan. Corpus compiled at the University of Michigan in 2009http://​micusp​.elicorpora​.info​/about​-micusp
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R.
(2005) The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olohan, M.
(2003) How frequent are the contractions? A study of contracted forms in the Translational English Corpus. International Journal on Translation Studies, 15(1), 59–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paquot, M., Hasselgård, H., & Oksefjell Ebeling, S.
(2013) Writer/reader visibility in learner writing across genres: A comparison of the French and Norwegian components of the ICLE and VESPA learner corpora. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), Twenty years of learner corpus research: Looking back, moving ahead (pp. 377–388). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Petch-Tyson, S.
(1998) Writer/reader visibility in EFL written discourse. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on computer (pp. 107–118). London: Longman.Google Scholar
R Core Team
(2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://​www​.R​-project​.org/
Römer, U.
(2009) The inseparability of lexis and grammar: Corpus linguistic perspectives. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 71, 140–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E. L.
(1986) Achieving impact through the interpersonal component. In B. Couture (Ed.), Functional approaches to writing (pp. 108–119). London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Wickham, H.
(2009)  ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York, NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Full-text

Grammatical stance marking across registers
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Granger, Sylviane & Tove Larsson
2021. Is core vocabulary a friend or foe of academic writing? Single-word vs multi-word uses of thing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 52  pp. 100999 ff. Crossref logo
Larsson, Tove & Henrik Kaatari
2020. Syntactic complexity across registers: Investigating (in)formality in second-language writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 45  pp. 100850 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.