Cover not available
Article published In:
Register Studies
Vol. 1:2 (2019) ► pp.296–317
Corpus Description

Functional variation in the Spoken BNC2014 and the potential for register analysis

 | University of Leeds, UK
 | Lancaster University, UK
 | Lancaster University, UK
 | Lancaster University, UK
 | Lancaster University, UK
 | Cambridge University Press, UK
This article focuses on how register considerations informed and guided the design of the spoken component of the British National Corpus 2014 (Spoken BNC2014). It discusses why the compilers of the corpus sought to gather recordings from just one broad spoken register – ‘informal conversation’ – and how this and other design decisions afforded contributors to the corpus much freedom with regards to the selection of situational contexts for the recordings. This freedom resulted in a high level of diversity in the corpus for situational parameters such as recording location and activity type, each of which was captured in the corpus metadata. Focussing on these parameters, this article provides evidence for functional variation among the texts in the corpus and suggests that differences such as those observed presently could be analysable within the existing frameworks for analysis of register variation in spoken and written language, such as multidimensional analysis.
Keywords: corpora, corpus design, BNC2014, British English, spoken language
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.BNC2014: Approaches to register
  • 3.The Spoken BNC2014: Design
  • 4.The Spoken BNC2014: Functional variation
  • 5.Conclusion and further directions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 25 September 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.18013.lov
References (17)
References
Adolphs, S., Brown, B., Carter, R., Crawford, P., & Sahota, O. (2004). Applying corpus linguists in a health care context. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 9–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aston, G., & Burnard, L. (1998). The BNC Handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989). A typology of English texts. Linguistics 271, 3–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Conversation text types: A multi-dimensional analysis. In G. Purnelle, C. Fairon, & A. Dister (Eds.), Le poids des mots: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Statistical Analysis of Textual Data (pp. 15–34). Louvain: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowdy, S. (1995). The BNC spoken corpus. In G. Leech, G. Myers, & J. Thomas (Eds.), Spoken English on computer: Transcription, mark-up and annotation (pp. 224–234). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Cummins, F., Grimaldi, M., Leonard, T., & Simko, J. (2006). The CHAINS corpus: CHAracterizing INdividual Speakers. In Speech Informatics Group of SPIIRAS (Ed.), Proceedings of SPECOM’2006 (Speech and Computer 11th International Conference) (pp. 431–435). St Petersburg: Anatolya Publishers.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2019). The TV and Movie corpora. Retrieved from <[URL]> (February 2019).
Handford, M. (2007). The genre of the business meeting: A corpus-based study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. (2012). CQPweb – combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17(3), 380–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawtin, A. (forthcoming). The Written British National Corpus 2014: Design, compilation and analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lancaster University.
Love, R. (forthcoming). Overcoming challenges in corpus construction: The Spoken British National Corpus 2014. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logo
Love, R. & Anthony, L. (in preparation). A case for improving the textual and sub-textual analysis of corpora.
Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 319–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidlhofer, B., Breiteneder, A., Klimpfinger, T., Majewski, S., Osimk-Teasdale, R., Pitzl, M. -L., & Radeka, M. (2013). The Vienna-Oxford International Corpus of English (version 2.0 XML). <[URL]> (April 2018).
Thompson, P., & Nesi, H. (2001). The British Academic Spoken English (BASE) Corpus Project. Language Teaching Research, 5(3), 263–264.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Woodin, Greg, Bodo Winter, Jeannette Littlemore, Marcus Perlman & Jack Grieve
2024. Large-scale patterns of number use in spoken and written English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 20:1 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Hanks, Elizabeth
2023. Review of Love (2020): Overcoming challenges in corpus construction: The Spoken British National Corpus 2014. Register Studies 5:1 ► pp. 136 ff. DOI logo
Egbert, Jesse, Stacey Wizner, Daniel Keller, Douglas Biber, Tony McEnery & Paul Baker
2021. Identifying and describing functional discourse units in the BNC Spoken 2014. Text & Talk 41:5-6 ► pp. 715 ff. DOI logo
Knight, Dawn, Steve Morris, Laura Arman, Jennifer Needs & Mair Rees
2021. (Meta)Data Collection. In Building a National Corpus, ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Love, Robbie
2021. Swearing in informal spoken English: 1990s–2010s. Text & Talk 41:5-6 ► pp. 739 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. A Constructional Account of Verb-Forming Suffixation [Constructional Approaches to Language, 36], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.