Article published in:
Register Studies
Vol. 2:1 (2020) ► pp. 72101


Fiction – one register or two?

[ p. 99 ]References

Axelsson, K.
(2009) Research on fiction dialogue: Problems and possible solutions. In A. H. Jucker, D. Schreier and M. Hundt (Eds.), Corpora: Pragmatics and discourse. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 189–201. Crossref link
Biber, D. & Conrad, S.
(2009) Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link. Crossref link
Barlow, M.
(2016) WordSkew. Linking corpus data and discourse structure. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21(1), 105–115. Crossref link
Bhatia, V. K.
(2014) Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Routledge. Crossref link
Biber, D.
(1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
(1993) Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257. Crossref link
(2006) University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2014) Using multi-dimensional analysis to explore cross-linguistic universals of register variation. Languages in Contrast, 14(1), 7–34. Crossref link
Biber, D., Connor, U. & Upton, T. A.
(2007) Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Biber, D., & Egbert, J.
(2018) Register variation online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Biber, D., & Finegan, E.
(1994) Multi-dimensional analyses of authors’ styles: Some case studies from the eigtheenth century. In D. Ross & D. Brink (Eds.), Research in humanities computing (pp. 3–17). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2001) Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies (pp. 66–83). New York, NY: Routledge.
Burrows, J. F.
(1987) Computation into criticism: A study of Jane Austen’s novels and an experiment in method. Oxford: Clarendon.
Clarke, I., & Grieve, J.
(2017) Dimensions of abusive language on Twitter. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Abusive Language Online (pp. 1–10), Vancouver, Canada (August 4 2017) Crossref link
Conrad, S. & Biber, D.
(2001) Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies. New York: Routledge.
Culpeper, J. & Kytö, M.
(2010) Early modern English dialogues: Spoken interactions as writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davies, M., & Gardner, D.
(2010) A frequency dictionary of contemporary American English. New York, NY: Routledge.
De Haan, P.
(1996) More on the language of dialogue in fiction. ICAME Journal, 20, 23–40.
Egbert, J.
(2012) Style in nineteenth century fiction: A multi-dimensional analysis. Scientific Study of Literature, 2(2), 167–198. Crossref link
(2015) Publication type and discipline variation in published academic writing: Investigating statistical interaction in corpus data. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(1), 1–29. Crossref link
[ p. 100 ]
Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Davies, M.
(2015) Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(9): 1817–1831. Crossref link
Egbert, J., & Schnur, E.
(2018) Missing the trees for the forest: The role of the text in corpus and discourse analysis. In A. Marchi & C. Taylor (Eds.), Corpus approaches to discourse: A critical review. New York, NY: Routledge. Crossref link
Flowerdew, L.
(2003) A combined corpus and systemic-functional analysis of the problem-solution pattern in a student and professional corpus of technical writing. TESOL Quarterly, 37(3), 489–511. Crossref link
(2008) Corpus-based analyses of the problem-solution pattern: A phraseological approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Gavins, J.
(2007) Text world theory. An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Crossref link
Gray, B.
(2011) Exploring academic writing through corpus linguistics: When discipline tells only part of the story (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University.
Hoey, M.
(2001) Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse anlaysis. London: Routledge.
Hubbard, E. H.
(2002) Conversation, characterization and corpus linguistics: Dialogue in Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility. Literator, 23(2), 67–85. Crossref link
Leech, G. & Short, M.
(2007) Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. 2nd edition. Harlow: Pearson.
Kyto, M., Rudanko, J., & Smitterberg, E.
(2000) Building a bridge between the present and the past: A corpus of 19th-century English. ICAME journal, 24, 85–98.
Mahlberg, M.
(2013) Corpus stylistics and Dickens’s fiction. London: Routledge.Crossref link
Mahlberg, M & Stockwell, P.
(2016) Point and CLiC: Teaching literature with corpus stylistic tools. In M. Burke, O. Fialho & S. Zyngier (Eds.), Scientific approaches to literature in learning environments (pp. 251–267). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Mahlberg, M., Stockwell, P., de Joode, J., Smith, C., & O’Donnell, M. Brook
(2016) CLiC Dickens – Novel uses of concordances for the integration of corpus stylistics and cognitive poetics. Corpora, 11(3), 433–463. Crossref link
Mahlberg, M., Wiegand, V., Stockwell, P., & A. Hennessey
(2019a) Speech-bundles in the 19th-century English Novel. Language and Literature, 28(4), 326–353. Crossref link
Mahlberg, M., Wiegand, V., Lentin, J., et al.
(2019b) CLiC User Guide v2.0.1 documentation. Retrieved from: http://​clic​.bham​.ac​.uk​/docs/ (19, August 2019).
Mooi, E., & Sarstedt, M.
(2010) Data. In R. Stahlbock, S. F. Crone, & S. Lessmann (Eds.), A concise guide to market research (pp. 25–44). Berlin: Springer. Crossref link
Norris, J.
(2015) Discriminant analysis. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. London: Routledge. Crossref link
O’Donnell, M. B., Scott, M., Mahlberg, M., & Hoey, M.
(2012) Exploring text-initial words, clusters and concgrams in a newspaper corpus. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8(1), 73–101.
Oostdijk, N.
(1990) The language of dialogue in fiction. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 5(3), 235–241. Crossref link
Page, N.
(1988) Speech in the English novel. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International. Crossref link
[ p. 101 ]
Paltridge, B.
(1996) Genre, text type, and the language learning classroom. ELT Journal, 50(3), 237–243. Crossref link
Poulsen, J., & French, A.
(2008) Discriminant function analysis. Retrieved from: http://​userwww​.sfsu​.edu​/~efc​/classes​/biol710​/discrim​/discrim​.pdf (23 October 2017).
Rosso, M. A.
(2008) User-based identification of web genres. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(7), 1053–1072. Crossref link
Römer, U.
(2010) Establishing the phraseological profile of a text type: The construction of meaning in academic book reviews. English Text Construction, 3(1), 95–119. Crossref link
Scott, M., & Tribble, C.
(2006) Textual patterns. Key words and corpus analysis in language education. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Semino, E., & Short, M.
(2004) Corpus stylistics: Speech, writing and thought presentation in a corpus of English writing. London: Routledge. Crossref link
Staples, S., & Biber, D.
(2015) Cluster analysis. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. London: Routledge. Crossref link
Sorensen, K.
(1989) Narration and speech-rendering in Dickens. Dickens Quarterly, 6(4), 131.
Swales, J.
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S.
(2007) Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.