Article published in:
Register Studies
Vol. 2:1 (2020) ► pp. 72101


Axelsson, K.
(2009) Research on fiction dialogue: Problems and possible solutions. In A. H. Jucker, D. Schreier and M. Hundt (Eds.), Corpora: Pragmatics and discourse. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 189–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. & Conrad, S.
(2009) Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, M.
(2016) WordSkew. Linking corpus data and discourse structure. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21(1), 105–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, V. K.
(2014) Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
(1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Using multi-dimensional analysis to explore cross-linguistic universals of register variation. Languages in Contrast, 14(1), 7–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Connor, U. & Upton, T. A.
(2007) Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Egbert, J.
(2018) Register variation online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Finegan, E.
(1994) Multi-dimensional analyses of authors’ styles: Some case studies from the eigtheenth century. In D. Ross & D. Brink (Eds.), Research in humanities computing (pp. 3–17). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2001) Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies (pp. 66–83). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burrows, J. F.
(1987) Computation into criticism: A study of Jane Austen’s novels and an experiment in method. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Clarke, I., & Grieve, J.
(2017) Dimensions of abusive language on Twitter. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Abusive Language Online (pp. 1–10), Vancouver, Canada (August 4 2017) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, S. & Biber, D.
(2001) Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. & Kytö, M.
(2010) Early modern English dialogues: Spoken interactions as writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, M., & Gardner, D.
(2010) A frequency dictionary of contemporary American English. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Haan, P.
(1996) More on the language of dialogue in fiction. ICAME Journal, 201, 23–40.Google Scholar
Egbert, J.
(2012) Style in nineteenth century fiction: A multi-dimensional analysis. Scientific Study of Literature, 2(2), 167–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Publication type and discipline variation in published academic writing: Investigating statistical interaction in corpus data. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(1), 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Davies, M.
(2015) Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(9): 1817–1831. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J., & Schnur, E.
(2018) Missing the trees for the forest: The role of the text in corpus and discourse analysis. In A. Marchi & C. Taylor (Eds.), Corpus approaches to discourse: A critical review. New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, L.
(2003) A combined corpus and systemic-functional analysis of the problem-solution pattern in a student and professional corpus of technical writing. TESOL Quarterly, 37(3), 489–511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Corpus-based analyses of the problem-solution pattern: A phraseological approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gavins, J.
(2007) Text world theory. An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gray, B.
(2011) Exploring academic writing through corpus linguistics: When discipline tells only part of the story (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University.Google Scholar
Hoey, M.
(2001) Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse anlaysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hubbard, E. H.
(2002) Conversation, characterization and corpus linguistics: Dialogue in Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility . Literator, 23(2), 67–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G. & Short, M.
(2007) Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. 2nd edition. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Kyto, M., Rudanko, J., & Smitterberg, E.
(2000) Building a bridge between the present and the past: A corpus of 19th-century English. ICAME journal, 241, 85–98.Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M.
(2013) Corpus stylistics and Dickens’s fiction. London: Routledge.Crossref. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, M & Stockwell, P
(2016) Point and CLiC: Teaching literature with corpus stylistic tools. In M. Burke, O. Fialho & S. Zyngier (Eds.), Scientific approaches to literature in learning environments (pp. 251–267). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, M., Stockwell, P., de Joode, J., Smith, C., & O’Donnell, M. Brook
(2016) CLiC Dickens – Novel uses of concordances for the integration of corpus stylistics and cognitive poetics. Corpora, 11(3), 433–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, M., Wiegand, V., Stockwell, P., & A. Hennessey
(2019a) Speech-bundles in the 19th-century English Novel. Language and Literature, 28(4), 326–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, M., Wiegand, V., Lentin, J., et al.
(2019b) CLiC User Guide v2.0.1 documentation. Retrieved from: http://​clic​.bham​.ac​.uk​/docs/> (19, August 2019).
Mooi, E., & Sarstedt, M.
(2010) Data. In R. Stahlbock, S. F. Crone, & S. Lessmann (Eds.), A concise guide to market research (pp. 25–44). Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J.
(2015) Discriminant analysis. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, M. B., Scott, M., Mahlberg, M., & Hoey, M.
(2012) Exploring text-initial words, clusters and concgrams in a newspaper corpus. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8(1), 73–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oostdijk, N.
(1990) The language of dialogue in fiction. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 5(3), 235–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Page, N.
(1988) Speech in the English novel. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, B.
(1996) Genre, text type, and the language learning classroom. ELT Journal, 50(3), 237–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poulsen, J., & French, A.
(2008) Discriminant function analysis. Retrieved from: http://​userwww​.sfsu​.edu​/~efc​/classes​/biol710​/discrim​/discrim​.pdf> (23 October 2017).
Rosso, M. A.
(2008) User-based identification of web genres. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(7), 1053–1072. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Römer, U.
(2010) Establishing the phraseological profile of a text type: The construction of meaning in academic book reviews. English Text Construction, 3(1), 95–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M., & Tribble, C.
(2006) Textual patterns. Key words and corpus analysis in language education. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semino, E., & Short, M.
(2004) Corpus stylistics: Speech, writing and thought presentation in a corpus of English writing. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Staples, S., & Biber, D.
(2015) Cluster analysis. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, K.
(1989) Narration and speech-rendering in Dickens. Dickens Quarterly, 6(4), 131.Google Scholar
Swales, J.
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S.
(2007) Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar


Fiction – one register or two?
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Granger, Sylviane & Marie-Aude Lefer
2020. Introduction. Languages in Contrast 20:2  pp. 167 ff. Crossref logo
Le Foll, Elen
2021. Register variation in school EFL textbooks. Register Studies 3:2  pp. 207 ff. Crossref logo
Neumann, Stella & Stefan Evert
2021.  In Corpus-based Approaches to Register Variation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 103],  pp. 143 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.