Cover not available
Article published In:
Register Studies
Vol. 5:1 (2023) ► pp.52–81

The concept of register in heritage language retention

| University of Münster

This paper argues for a greater consideration of the role of register in the retention of heritage languages by analyzing data on adolescent heritage-language speakers in Germany. The study addresses the following question: Which language external factors have the greatest impact on heritage-language retention in the intimate vs formal registers? A questionnaire was filled out by 202 students (age 15–17) in an urban area in Germany, who are all heritage-language speakers of 42 different languages. The major finding of this study is that heritage-language retention is determined by different language-external factors in each register. The fact that different models of heritage-language retention can be postulated for different language registers emphasizes the need to describe the language competences of heritage-language speakers according to registers.

Keywords: heritage language, minority language, language maintenance, language retention, external factors, register
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Heritage languages and their speakers
  • 3.The concept of register in heritage language research
  • 4.The study
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Instruments
    • 4.3Results
    • 4.4Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 24 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.20017.olf
References
Aalberse, S., Backus, A., & Muysken, P.
(2019) Heritage languages: A language contact approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Acevedo, R.
(2003) Navegando a través del registro formal: Curso para hispanohablantes bilingües. In A. Roca & M. C. Colombi (Eds.), Mi lengua: Spanish as a heritage language in the United States (pp. 257–268). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Albirini, A., & Chakrani, B.
(2017) Switching codes and registers: An analysis of heritage Arabic speakers’ sociolinguistic competence. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21 (3), 317–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T.
(2004) An organizing framework for collective identity. Significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130 (1), 80–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Au, T. K., Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A., & Oh, J. S.
(2002) Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychological Science, 13 1, 238–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Au, T. K., & Oh, J. S.
(2009) Korean as a heritage language. In C. Lee, G. Simpson & Y. Kim (Eds.), The handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics. Volume III1: Korean (pp. 268–275). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, C.
(1992) Attitudes and language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S. A., & Polinsky, M.
(2010) White paper. Prolegomena to heritage linguistics. [URL] (May 2022)
(2013) Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 39 (3–4), 129–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
(1995) Dimensions of register variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
(2019) Register, genre, and style (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brehmer, B., & Mehlhorn, G.
(2018) Herkunftssprachen [Heritage languages]. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.Google Scholar
Callahan, L.
(2010) US Latinos’ use of written Spanish. Heritage Language Journal, 7 (1), 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caprez-Krompàk, E.
(2010) Entwicklung der Erst- und Zweitsprache im interkulturellen Kontext [Development of the first and second language in an intercultural context]. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Carreira, M. M., & Rodriguez, R. M.
(2011) Community Spanish language programs in Los Angeles serving to preserve the language. Heritage Language Journal, 8 (2), 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chlosta, C., Ostermann, T., & Schroeder, C.
(2003) Die „Durchschnittsschule“ und ihre Sprachen. Ergebnisse des Projekts Spracherhebung Essener Grundschulen (SPREEG) [The “average school” and its languages. Results of the language survey project at Essen elementary schools (SPREEG)]. Essener Linguistische Skripte – elektronisch, 31, 43–139.Google Scholar
Colombi, M. C.
(2009) A systemic functional approach to teaching Spanish for heritage speakers in the United States. Linguistics and Education, 20 (1), 39–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Academic and cultural literacy for heritage speakers of Spanish: A case study of Latin@ students in California. Linguistics and Education, 321, 5–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Houwer, A.
(2007) Parental language input patterns and children’s bilingual use. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28 (3), 411–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Leeuw, E., Schmid, M. S., & Mennen, I.
(2010) The effects of contact on native language pronunciation in an L2 migrant setting. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13 (1), 33–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ecke, P.
(2004) Language attrition and theories of forgetting. A cross-disciplinary review. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8 (3), 321–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, G.
(1976) Second-language retention in the Canadian public service. Canadian Modern Language Review, 32 (3), 305–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Field, A.
(2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A.
(1991) Reversing language shift. Theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2001) 300-plus years of heritage language education in the United States. In J. Kreeft Peyton, D. A. Ranard & S. McGinnis (Eds.), Heritage languages in America. Preserving a national resource (pp. 81–97). McHenry (IL): Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C., & Lysynchuk, L. M.
(1990) The role of aptitude, attitudes, motivation, and language use on second-language acquisition and retention. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 22 (3), 254–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grenoble, L. A., & Whaley, L. J.
(2006) Saving languages. An introduction to language revitalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F.
(2001) The bilingual’s language modes. In J. L. Nicol (Ed.), One mind, two languages. Bilingual language processing (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2012) Bilingual and monolingual language modes. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–9). Hoboken: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Güntürk, R.
(2000) Mediennutzung der türkischen Migranten [Media use by Turkish migrants]. In H. Schatz, C. Holtz-Bacha & J.-U. Nieland (Eds.), Migranten und Medien (pp. 272–280). Wiesbaden: VS. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herdina, P., & Jessner, U.
(2002) A Dynamic model of multilingualism. Perspectives of change in psycholinguistics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hufeisen, B.
(2003) L1, L2, L3, L4, Lx – alle gleich? Linguistische, lernerinterne und lernerexterne Faktoren in Modellen zum multiplen Spracherwerb [L1, L2, L3, L4, Lx – all the same? Linguistic, learner-internal and learner-external factors in models of multiple language acquisition]. Zeitschrift für interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 8 1, 97–109.Google Scholar
Jensen, L., & Llosa, L.
(2007) Heritage language reading in the university: A survey of students’ experiences, strategies, and preferences. Heritage Language Journal, 5 (1), 98–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juvonen, P., Eisenchlas, S. A., Roberts, T., & Schalley, A. C.
(2020) Researching social and affective factors in home language maintenance and development. A methodology overview. In A. C. Schalley & S. A. Eisenchlas (Eds.), Handbook of home language maintenance and development. Social and affective factors (pp. 38–58). Berlin: DeGruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, H.-S. H.
(2011) Issues of heritage learners in Korean language classes. Korean Language in America, 6 1, 257–274.Google Scholar
Klassert, A., & Gagarina, N.
(2010) Der Einfluss des elterlichen Inputs auf die Sprachentwicklung bilingualer Kinder: Evidenz aus russischsprachigen Migrantenfamilien in Berlin [The influence of parental input on the language development of bilingual children: Evidence from Russian-speaking migrant families in Berlin]. Diskurs Kindheits- und Jugendforschung, 5 (4), 413–425.Google Scholar
Klein, W.
(2000) Prozesse des Zweitspracherwerbs [Processes of second language acquisition]. In H. Grimm & N. Birbaumer (Eds.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie (pp. 538–570). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
(2013) Speaking Punjabi. Heritage language socialization and language ideologies in a Sikh education program. Heritage Language Journal, 10 (1), 36–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, P., & Oesterreicher, W.
(1985) Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte [Language of proximity – language of distance. Orality and literacy in the field of tension between language theory and language history]. Romanistisches Jahrbuch, 36 1, 15–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kondo-Brown, K.
(2005) Differences in language skills. Heritage language learner subgroups and foreign language learners. The Modern Language Journal, 89 (4), 563–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köpke, B.
(2007) Attrition at the crossroads of brain, mind, and society. In B. Köpke, M. S. Schmid, M. Keijzer & S. Dostert (Eds.), Language attrition. Theoretical perspectives (pp. 9–37). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Küppers, A., Şimşek, Y., & Schroeder, C.
(2015) Turkish as a minority language in Germany. Aspects of language development and language instruction. Zeitschrift für Fremdsprachenforschung, 261, 29–51.Google Scholar
Lengyel, D., & Neumann, U.
(2016) Herkunftssprachlicher Unterricht in Hamburg. Eine Studie zur Bedeutung des herkunftssprachlichen Unterrichts aus Elternsicht (HUBE) [Heritage language lessons in Hamburg. A study on the importance of heritage language teaching from the parents’ perspective (HUBE)]. Project report. Hamburg: Universität Hamburg.Google Scholar
Lo Bianco, J., & Kreeft Peyton, J.
(2013) Vitality of heritage languages in the United States. The role of capacity, opportunity, and desire. Heritage Language Journal, 10 (3), i–viii. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, A.
(2003) Toward a theory of heritage language acquisition: Spanish in the United States. In A. Roca & M. C. Colombi (Eds.), Mi lengua: Spanish as a heritage language in the United States (pp. 25–50). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Maas, U.
(2008) Sprache und Sprachen in der Migrationsgesellschaft. Die schriftkulturelle Dimension [Language and languages in the migration society. The literacy dimension]. Osnabrück: V&R Unipress.Google Scholar
(2009) Sprache in Migrationsverhältnissen. „Sprachausbau (Schriftsprache) vs. mehrsprachige Kommunikation“ [Language in migration situations. “Language development (written language) vs. multilingual communication”]. In I. Gogolin & U. Neumann (Eds.), Streitfall Zweisprachigkeit. The Bilingualism controversy (pp. 145–161). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Orat und literat [Orate and literate]. Graz: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Graz.Google Scholar
Maehler, D. B.
(2012) Akkulturation und Identifikation bei eingebürgerten Migranten in Deutschland [Acculturation and identification among naturalized migrants in Germany]. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M.
(2007) The language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q). Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50 1, 940–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M.
(2013) Heritage language learners. Unprecedented opportunities for the study of grammars and their development? Theoretical Linguistics, 39 (3–4), 225–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. A.
(2011) The linguistic competence of heritage speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33 1, 155–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) The acquisition of heritage languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2020) How learning context shapes heritage and second language acquisition. In M. Dressman & R. W. Sadler (Eds.), The handbook of informal language learning (pp. 57–74). Chichester: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. A., & Potowski, K.
(2007) Command of gender agreement in school-age Spanish-English bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11 (3), 301–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murtagh, L.
(2003) Retention and attrition of Irish as a second language. A longitudinal study of general and communicative proficiency in Irish among second level school leavers and the influence of instructional background, language use and attitude/motivation variables. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen).
Olfert, H.
(2019) Spracherhalt und Sprachverlust bei Jugendlichen. Eine Analyse begünstigender und hemmender Faktoren für Spracherhalt im Kontext von Migration [Language retention and language loss in adolescents. An analysis of enabling and inhibiting factors for language retention in the context of migration]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Olfert, H., & Schmitz, A.
(2016) Heritage language education in Germany. A focus on Turkish and Russian from primary to higher education. In P. P. Trifonas & T. Aravossitas (Eds.), International handbook on research and practice in heritage language education (pp. 1–19). Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pauwels, A.
(2004) Language maintenance. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 719–737). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Language maintenance and shift. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phinney, J.
(1989) Stages of ethnic identity development in minority group adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 9 (1–2), 34–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pires, A., & Rothman, J.
(2009) Disentangling sources of incomplete acquisition: An explanation for competence divergence across heritage grammars. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13 1, 211–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M.
(2015) Heritage languages and their speakers. State of the field, challenges, perspectives for future work, and methodologies. Zeitschrift für Fremdsprachenforschung, 26 1, 7–27.Google Scholar
(2018) Heritage languages and their speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M., & Kagan, O.
(2007) Heritage languages. In the ‘wild’ and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1 1, 368–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potowski, K.
(2002) Experiences of Spanish heritage speakers in university foreign language courses and implications for teacher training. Adfl Bulletin, 33 (3), 35–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riehl, C. M.
(2004) Sprachkontaktforschung. Eine Einführung [Language contact research. An introduction]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Rothman, J.
(2007) Heritage speaker competence differences, language change, and input type. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11 (4), 359–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Said-Mohand, A.
(2011) The teaching of Spanish as a heritage language: Overview of what we need to know as educators. Porta Linguarum, 161, 89–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sánchez Muñoz, A.
(2007) Register and style variation in speakers of Spanish as a heritage and as a second language. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California).
Sasse, H.-J.
(1992) Theory of language death. In M. Brenzinger (Ed.), Language death. Factual and theoretical explorations with special reference to East Africa (pp. 7–30). Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Schalley, A. C., & Eisenchlas, S. A.
(2020) Social and affective factors in home language maintenance and development. In A. C. Schalley & S. A. Eisenchlas (Eds.), Handbook of home language maintenance and development. Social and affective factors (pp. 1–13). Berlin: DeGruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, M. S.
(2007) The role of L1 use for L1 attrition. In B. Köpke, M. S. Schmid, M. Keijzer & S. Dostert (Eds.), Language attrition. Theoretical perspectives (pp. 135–153). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, C.
(2003) Der Türkischunterricht in Deutschland und seine Sprache(n) [Turkish lessons in Germany and its language(s)]. Zeitschrift für Fremdsprachenforschung, 14 1, 23–39.Google Scholar
Schroeder, C., & Şimşek, Y.
(2010) Die Entwicklung der Kategorie Wort im Türkisch-Deutsch bilingualen Schrifterwerb in Deutschland [The development of the word category in Turkish-German bilingual writing acquisition in Germany]. In C. Weth (Ed.), Schrifterwerb unter den Bedingungen von Mehrsprachigkeit und Fremdsprachenunterricht (pp. 55–79). Osnabrück: IMIS.Google Scholar
Sekerina, I.
(2013) A psychometric approach to heritage language studies. Heritage Language Journal, 10 (2), 203–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sirén, U.
(1995) Minority language transmission in early childhood. International Journal of Early Years Education, 3 (2), 75–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T.
(1988) Multilingualism and the education of minority children. In T. Skutnabb-Kangas & J. Cummins (Eds.), Minority education. From shame to struggle (pp. 9–44). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Son, Y. A.
(2017) Toward useful assessment and evaluation of heritage language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 50 (2), 367–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torres, J., Estremera, R., & Mohamed, S.
(2019) The contribution of psychological and biographical variables to heritage language learners’ linguistic knowledge of Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41 (4), 695–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tse, L.
(1998) Ethnic identity formation and its implications for heritage language development. In S. D. Krashen, L. Tse & J. McQuillan (Eds.), Heritage language development (pp. 15–29). Culver: Language Education Associates.Google Scholar
(2000) The effects of ethnic identity formation on bilingual maintenance and development. An analysis of Asian American narratives. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 3 (3), 185–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Heritage language literacy: A study of US biliterates. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 14 (3), 256–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Umbel, V. M., Pearson, B. Z., Fernández, M. C., & Oller, D. K.
(1992) Measuring bilingual children’s receptive vocabularies. Child Development, 63 (4), 1012–1020. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valdés, G.
(2001) Heritage language students. Profiles and possibilities. In J. Kreeft Peyton, D. A. Ranard & S. McGinnis (Eds.), Heritage languages in America. Preserving a national resource (pp. 37–77). McHenry (IL): Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Valdés, G., & Geoffrion-Vinci, M.
(1998) Chicano Spanish: The problem of the “underdeveloped” code in bilingual repertoires. The Modern Language Journal, 82 (4), 473–501.Google Scholar