Article published In:
Register StudiesVol. 3:1 (2021) ► pp.144–171
Multiple Correspondence Analysis, newspaper discourse and subregister
A case study of discourses of Islam in the British press
This article introduces a new method for grouping keywords and examines the extent to which it also allows analysts to
explore the interaction of discourse and subregister. It uses the multivariate statistical technique, Multiple Correspondence Analysis, to
reveal dimensions of keywords which co-occur across the texts of a corpus. These dimensions are then interpreted in terms of the discourses
to which they contribute within the data, thus forming the basis of a corpus-assisted discourse analysis. The approach is demonstrated
through analysis of the discourses that are used to represent Muslims and Islam in a corpus of UK national newspaper articles published on
these topics spanning 2010–2019. The approach reveals an interaction between discourse and subregister, hence this article argues for the
need for (corpus-assisted) discourse analysts to account for subregister as a level of meaningful variation when analysing press
discourse.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Islam in the press: Existing research and the recent context
- 3.Approach: Data, keyword co-occurrence and MCA
- 4.Results
- 4.1Dimension 2: War, conflict and terrorism vs. reporting of everyday life and events (link to subregister: Yes)
- 4.2Dimension 3: Foreign Affairs vs. domestic affairs (link to subregister: No)
- 4.3Dimension 4: Western political conflict vs. overseas conflict (link to subregister: Yes)
- 4.4Dimension 5: UK Policy versus US Policy (link to subregister: No)
- 4.5Dimension 6: Globalisation vs. Tribalism
- 4.6Dimension 7: Corruption and human rights vs. The aftermath of terror attacks (link to subregister: Yes)
- 4.7Dimension 8: The rise of the far right vs. the radicalisation of British Muslims (link to subregister: No)
- 4.8Dimension 9: Political processes and elections vs. political processes and security threats (link to subregister: No)
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
References (20)
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T. (2013). Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
Baker, P., & McEnery, T. (2019). The value of revisiting and extending previous studies: the case of Islam in the UK press. In R. Scholtz (Ed.), Quantifying Approaches to Discourse for Social Scientists (pp. 215–249). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bednarek, M. (2006). Evaluations in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London: Continuum.
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2019). Register, Genre and Style (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2013). Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics, 41(2), 104–134.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
Benzécri, J. P. (1979). Sur le calcul des taux d’inertie dans l’analyse d’un questionnaire. Cahiers de l’Analyse des Données, 41, 377–378.
Brookes, G., & McEnery, T. (2019). The utility of topic modelling for discourse studies: a critical evaluation, Discourse Studies, 21(1), 3–21.
Carter, R. (1988). The language of written sports commentary: soccer – a description. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Registers of Written English. Situational Factors and Linguistic Features (pp. 16–51). London: Frances Pinter, London.
Clarke, I. (2019). Functional linguistic variation in Twitter trolling. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 26(1), 57–84.
Clarke, I., Brookes, G. & McEnery, T. (Forthcoming). Keywords through time: Tracking changes in press discourses of Islam. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics.
Dunning, T. (1993). Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1), 61–74.
Lê, S., Josse, J., & Husson, F. (2008). FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(1), 1–18.
Le Roux, B., & Rouanet, H. (2010). Multiple Correspondence Analysis. London: Sage.
Partington, A. (2014). Mind the gaps: The role of corpus linguistics in researching absences. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(1), 118–146.
Pinna, A., & Brett, D. (2018). Constance and variability: Using PoS-grams to find phraseologies in the language of newspapers. In J. Kopaczyk & J. Tyrkkö (Eds.), Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics (pp. 107–130). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Richardson, J. E. (2004). (Mis)Representing Islam: The Racism and Rhetoric of British Broadsheet Newspapers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schroeter, M. & Taylor, C. (2018). Exploring Silence and Absence in Discourse: Empirical Approaches. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zou, H., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. (2006). Sparse Principal Component Analysis. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15(2), 265–286.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Brookes, Gavin, Tony McEnery & Isobelle Clarke
2023. The Representation of Islamism in the UK Press. In Media Language on Islam and Muslims, ► pp. 57 ff. 
Gillings, Mathew, Gerlinde Mautner & Paul Baker
2023. Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies,
Clarke, Isobelle, Gavin Brookes & Tony McEnery
Foye, Chris
2022. Framing the housing crisis: How think-tanks frame politics and science to advance policy agendas. Geoforum 134 ► pp. 71 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.