Article in:
Register Studies
Vol. 3:1 (2021) ► pp. 144171

Full-text

Multiple Correspondence Analysis, newspaper discourse and subregister
References

References

Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T.
(2013) Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P., & McEnery, T.
(2019) The value of revisiting and extending previous studies: the case of Islam in the UK press. In R. Scholtz (Ed.), Quantifying Approaches to Discourse for Social Scientists (pp. 215–249). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, M.
(2006) Evaluations in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Biber, D.
(1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
(2019) Register, Genre and Style (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B.
(2013) Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics, 41(2), 104–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Benzécri, J. P.
(1979) Sur le calcul des taux d’inertie dans l’analyse d’un questionnaire. Cahiers de l’Analyse des Données, 4, 377–378.Google Scholar
Brookes, G., & McEnery, T.
(2019) The utility of topic modelling for discourse studies: a critical evaluation, Discourse Studies, 21(1), 3–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R.
(1988) The language of written sports commentary: soccer – a description. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Registers of Written English. Situational Factors and Linguistic Features (pp. 16–51). London: Frances Pinter, London.Google Scholar
Clarke, I.
(2019) Functional linguistic variation in Twitter trolling. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 26(1), 57–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, I., Brookes, G. & McEnery, T.
Forthcoming). Keywords through time: Tracking changes in press discourses of Islam. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics.
Dunning, T.
(1993) Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1), 61–74.Google Scholar
, S., Josse, J., & Husson, F.
(2008) FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(1), 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Le Roux, B., & Rouanet, H.
(2010) Multiple Correspondence Analysis. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Partington, A.
(2014) Mind the gaps: The role of corpus linguistics in researching absences. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(1), 118–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinna, A., & Brett, D.
(2018) Constance and variability: Using PoS-grams to find phraseologies in the language of newspapers. In J. Kopaczyk & J. Tyrkkö (Eds.), Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics (pp. 107–130). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. E.
(2004) (Mis)Representing Islam: The Racism and Rhetoric of British Broadsheet Newspapers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schroeter, M. & Taylor, C.
(2018) Exploring Silence and Absence in Discourse: Empirical Approaches. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zou, H., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R.
(2006) Sparse Principal Component Analysis. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15(2), 265–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar