Article published in:
Register Studies
Vol. 3:1 (2021) ► pp. 144171
References
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T.
(2013) Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P., & McEnery, T.
(2019) The value of revisiting and extending previous studies: the case of Islam in the UK press. In R. Scholtz (Ed.), Quantifying Approaches to Discourse for Social Scientists (pp. 215–249). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, M.
(2006) Evaluations in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Biber, D.
(1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
(2019) Register, Genre and Style (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B.
(2013) Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics, 41(2), 104–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Benzécri, J. P.
(1979) Sur le calcul des taux d’inertie dans l’analyse d’un questionnaire. Cahiers de l’Analyse des Données, 41, 377–378.Google Scholar
Brookes, G., & McEnery, T.
(2019) The utility of topic modelling for discourse studies: a critical evaluation, Discourse Studies, 21(1), 3–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R.
(1988) The language of written sports commentary: soccer – a description. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Registers of Written English. Situational Factors and Linguistic Features (pp. 16–51). London: Frances Pinter, London.Google Scholar
Clarke, I.
(2019) Functional linguistic variation in Twitter trolling. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 26(1), 57–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, I., Brookes, G. & McEnery, T.
Forthcoming). Keywords through time: Tracking changes in press discourses of Islam. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics.
Dunning, T.
(1993) Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1), 61–74.Google Scholar
Lê, S., Josse, J., & Husson, F.
(2008) FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(1), 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Le Roux, B., & Rouanet, H.
(2010) Multiple Correspondence Analysis. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Partington, A.
(2014) Mind the gaps: The role of corpus linguistics in researching absences. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(1), 118–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinna, A., & Brett, D.
(2018) Constance and variability: Using PoS-grams to find phraseologies in the language of newspapers. In J. Kopaczyk & J. Tyrkkö (Eds.), Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics (pp. 107–130). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. E.
(2004) (Mis)Representing Islam: The Racism and Rhetoric of British Broadsheet Newspapers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schroeter, M. & Taylor, C.
(2018) Exploring Silence and Absence in Discourse: Empirical Approaches. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zou, H., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R.
(2006) Sparse Principal Component Analysis. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15(2), 265–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Full-text

Multiple Correspondence Analysis, newspaper discourse and subregister