Article published In:
Register StudiesVol. 5:2 (2023) ► pp.143–170
Register differences and intra-register variation of elicited texts
This study examines functional differences between texts elicited under different scenarios (both between- and intra-register variation). Text elicitation is used (in linguistics and other disciplines) to control for the conditions of production and in the hopes of observing different reactions to scenarios emulating real-life situations. However, it entails a series of questions: How well does the collected data correspond to real-world situations? How to design scenarios to be meaningfully distinct in terms of the language they elicit? In order to examine the linguistic variability of scenarios and to assess their ecological validity, the present study maps Czech elicited texts onto a previously established general-purpose multi-dimensional model of register variability. One of the takeaways is that scenarios mimicking informal situations are particularly conducive to obtaining responses with high intra-register variation, which makes them more likely than formal ones to reflect variability induced by for example different psychological characteristics of participants.
Keywords: elicitation, register, variability, multi-dimensional analysis, idiolect
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data
- 2.1Elicited data
- 2.2Data for MD model
- 3.Methods
- 3.1Deriving and interpreting the MD model
- 3.2Looking at elicited texts through the MD model
- 4.Results and discussion
- 4.1Characteristics of tasks
- 4.1.1Letter of apology
- 4.1.2Letter from Vacation
- 4.1.3Letter of complaint
- 4.1.4Cover letter
- 4.1.5Summary: Between-task register differences
- 4.2Intra-register variability
- 4.1Characteristics of tasks
- 5.Conclusions
- Notes
-
References
References
Barton, K. C.
(2015) Elicitation techniques: Getting people to talk about ideas they don’t usually talk about. Theory & Research in Social Education,
43
(2), 179–205. 
Berber Sardinha, T., Veirano Pinto, M., Mayer, C., Zuppardi, M. C., & Kauffmann, C. H.
(2019) Adding registers to a previous Multi-Dimensional Analysis. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research methods and current issues (pp. 165–186). New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
Bhatia, V. K.
(1993) Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.
Biber, D.
(1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press.
(1995) Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge University Press.
(2012) Register as a predictor of linguistic variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory,
8
(1), 9–37.
(2014) Using multi-dimensional analysis to explore cross-linguistic universals of register variation. Languages in Contrast,
14
(1), 7–34.
Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
(2009) Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press.
Conrad, S.
(2015) Register variation. In D. Biber & R. Reppen (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics (pp. 309–329). Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W.
(2008) Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
Cvrček, V., & Chlumská, L.
(2015) Simplification in translated Czech: A new approach to type-token ratio. Russian Linguistics,
39
(3), 309–325.
Cvrček, V., Komrsková, Z., & Lukeš, D.
(2018) Rozsah registrové variability textů. In D. Kučera, J. M. Havigerová, J. Haviger, V. Cvrček, Z. Komrsková, D. Lukeš, T. Jelínek, T. Urbánek, & J. Franková, Výzkum CPACT: Komputační psycholingvistická analýza českého textu (pp. 153–172). Pedagogická fakulta Jihočeské univerzity v Českých Budějovicích.
Cvrček, V., Komrsková, Z., Lukeš, D., Poukarová, P., Řehořková, A., & Zasina, A. J.
(2018) Variabilita češtiny: Multidimenzionální analýza. Slovo a slovesnost,
79
(4), 293–321.
Cvrček, V., Komrsková, Z., Lukeš, D., Poukarová, P., Řehořková, A., Zasina, A. J., & Benko, V.
(2020) Comparing web-crawled and traditional corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation,
54
1, 713–745.
Cvrček, V., Laubeová, Z., Lukeš, D., Poukarová, P., Řehořková, A., & Zasina, A. J.
(2020a) Author and register as sources of variation: A corpus-based study using elicited texts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics,
25
(4), 461–488.
(2020b) Registry v češtině. Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.
Cvrček, V., Komrsková, Z., Lukeš, D., Poukarová, P., Řehořková, A., & Zasina, A. J.
(2021) From extra- to intratextual characteristics: Charting the space of variation in Czech through MDA. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory,
17
(2), 351–382.
Český statistický úřad /Czech Statistical Office/
Fisher, R. J.
(1993) Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research,
20
(2), 303–315.
Havigerová, J. M., Haviger, J., Kučera, D., & Hoffmannová, P.
(2019) Text-based detection of the risk of depression. Frontiers in Psychology,
10
1, 513.
Hinkel, E.
(2002) Second language writers’ text: Linguistic and rhetorical features. Routledge.
Knapp, M. L., Hart, R. P., & Dennis, H. S.
(1974) An exploration of deception as a communication construct. Human Communication Research,
1
(1), 15–29.
Kučera, D.
(2017) Computational psycholinguistic analysis of Czech text and the CPACT research. 4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2017,
2
1, 77–84.
Kučera, D., & Havigerová, J. M.
(2017) Představení výzkumu CPACT – Komputační psycholingvistická analýza českého textu [Presentation of CPACT Research – Computational Psycholinguistic Analysis of the Czech Text]. In L. Pitel (Ed.), Sociálne procesy a osobnosť 2016: Zborník príspevkov (pp. 285–293). Ústav experimentálnej psychológie, Centrum spoločenských a psychologických vied SAV.
Newman, M. L., Pennebaker, J. W., Berry, D. S., & Richards, J. M.
(2003) Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,
29
(5), 665–675.
Oakes, M. P.
(1998) Statistics for corpus linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K.
(2015) The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin. [URL]
Pennebaker, J. W., & King, L. A.
(1999) Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
77
(6), 1296–1312.
Plester, B., Wood, C., & Joshi, P.
(2009) Exploring the relationship between children’s knowledge of text message abbreviations and school literacy outcomes. British Journal of Developmental Psychology,
27
(1), 145–161.
Ravid, D., & Berman, R. A.
(2010) Developing noun phrase complexity at school age: A text-embedded cross-linguistic analysis. First Language,
30
(1), 3–26.
Seidman, I.
(2013) Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th edition). Teachers College Press.
Staples, S., Biber, D., & Reppen, R.
(2018) Using corpus-based register analysis to explore the authenticity of high-stakes language exams: A register comparison of TOEFL iBT and disciplinary writing tasks. The Modern Language Journal,
102
(2), 310–332.
Steinar, K., & Brinkmann, S.
(2009) InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. SAGE.
Zasina, A. J., & Komrsková, Z.
(2019) Koditex – korpus diverzifikovaných textů. Studie z aplikované lingvistiky,
10
(1), 127–132. [URL]
Zasina, A. J., Lukeš, D., Komrsková, Z., Poukarová, P., & Řehořková, A.