Article published in:
Register and social media
Edited by Isobelle Clarke and Jack Grieve
[Register Studies 4:2] 2022
► pp. 232262
References
Agius, C., Bergman Rosamond, A., & Kinnvall, C.
(2020) Populism, ontological insecurity and gendered nationalism: Masculinity, climate denial and Covid-19. Politics, Religion and Ideology, 21 (4), 432–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, F.
(2015) On the mitigating function of modality and evidentiality. Evidence from English and Spanish medical research papers. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12 (1), 33–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, A. A., & Huntington, H. E.
(2017) Social media, science, and attack discourse: How Twitter discussions of climate change use sarcasm and incivility. Science Communication, 39 (5), 598–620. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersson, M.
(2021) The climate of climate change: Impoliteness as a hallmark of homophily in YouTube comment threads on Greta Thunberg’s environmental activism. Journal of Pragmatics, 178 1, 93–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andi, S.
(2020) How people access news about climate change. In Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andı, S., Nielsen, R. K. (Eds.), Reuters Institute digital news report 2020 (pp. 52–57). Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.Google Scholar
Arlt, D., Hoppe, I., Schmitt, J. B., De Silva-Schmidt, F., & Brüggemann, M.
(2018) Climate engagement in a digital age: Exploring the drivers of participation in climate discourse online in the context of COP21. Environmental Communication, 12 (1), 84–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, J., Zannettou, S., Keegan, B., Squire, M., & Blackburn, J.
(2020) The Pushshift Reddit dataset. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 14 (1), 830–839. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, M.
(2006) Evaluation in media discourse: analysis of a newspaper corpus. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2008) Emotion talk across corpora. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, M., Ross, A. S., Boichak, O., Doran, Y. J., Carr, G., Altmann, E. G., & Alexander, T. J.
(2022) Winning the discursive struggle? The impact of a significant environmental crisis event on dominant climate discourses on Twitter. Discourse, Context & Media, 45 1, 100564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y.
(1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57 (1), 289–300.Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
(2019) Register, genre, and style (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Egbert, J.
(2018) Register variation online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Finegan, E.
(1988) Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes, 11 (1), 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Boye, K.
(2012) Epistemic meaning: A crosslinguistic and functional-cognitive study. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brüggemann, M., Elgesem, D., Bienzeisler, N., Gertz, H. D., & Walter, S.
(2020) Mutual group polarization in the blogosphere: Tracking the hoax discourse on climate change. International Journal of Communication, 14 1, 1025–1048.Google Scholar
Buckledee, S.
(2018) The language of Brexit: How Britain talked its way out of the European Union. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Cagle, L. E., & Herndl, C.
(2019) Shades of denialism: Discovering possibilities for a more nuanced deliberation about climate change in online discussion forums. Communication Design Quarterly, 7 (1), 22–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charles, M.
(2003) “This mystery…”: A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2 (4), 313–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chipidza, W.
(2021) The effect of toxicity on COVID-19 news network formation in political subcommunities on Reddit: An affiliation network approach. International Journal of Information Management, 61 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clarke, I.
(2022) A multi-dimensional analysis of English tweets. Language and Literature, 31 (2), 124–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conrad, S., & Biber, D.
(2000) Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In Hunston, S., Thompson, G. (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 56–73). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J.
(2011) Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Francisci Morales, G., Monti, C., & Starnini, M.
(2021) No echo in the chambers of political interactions on Reddit. Scientific Reports, 11 (1), 2818. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Del Valle, M. E., Sijtsma, R., Stegeman, H., & Borge, R.
(2020) Online deliberation and the public sphere: Developing a coding manual to assess deliberation in Twitter political networks. Javnost – The Public, 27 (3), 211–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J. W.
(2007) The stance triangle. In Englebretson, R. (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse (pp. 139–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M.
(2010) Climate change denial: Sources, actors and strategies. In Lever-Tracy, C. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of climate change and society (pp. 240–259). Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eberl, M.
(2020) Double trouble: Are 280-character tweets comparable to 140-character tweets? In Rüdiger, S., Dayter, D. (Eds.), Corpus approaches to social media (pp. 131–146). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Englebretson, R.
(2007) Stancetaking in discourse: an introduction. In Englebretson, R. (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friginal, E., Waugh, O., & Titak, A.
(2017) Linguistic variation in Facebook and Twitter posts. In Friginal, E. (Ed.), Studies in corpus-based sociolinguistics (pp. 342–362). New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fu, X., & Hyland, K.
(2014) Interaction in two journalistic genres: A study of interactional metadiscourse. English Text Construction, 7 (1), 122–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Boyd, E.
(2017) Epistemic stance in spoken L2 English: The effect of task and speaker style. Applied Linguistics, 38 (5), 613–637. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González, M., Roseano, P., Borràs-Comes, J., & Prieto, P.
(2017) Epistemic and evidential marking in discourse: Effects of register and debatability. Lingua, 186–187 1, 68–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, B., & Biber, D.
(2012) Current conceptions of stance. In Hyland, K., Guinda, C. S. (Eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp. 15–33). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T.
(2008) Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13 (4), 403–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) Analysing dispersion. In Paquot, M., Gries, S. T. (Eds.), Practical handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 99–118). Berlin: Springer International. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grundmann, R., & Krishnamurthy, R.
(2010) The discourse of climate change: A corpus-based approach. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 4 (2), 113–133.Google Scholar
Hansson, S.
(2018) The discursive micro-politics of blame avoidance: Unpacking the language of government blame games. Policy Sciences, 51 (4), 545–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hobson, K., & Niemeyer, S.
(2013) “What sceptics believe”: The effects of information and deliberation on climate change scepticism. Public Understanding of Science, 22 (4), 396–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Honnibal, M., & Johnson, M.
(2015) An improved non-monotonic transition system for dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 1373–1378). Lisbon: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hosch-Dayican, B.
(2014) Online political activities as emerging forms of political participation: How do they fit in the conceptual map? Acta Politica, 49 (3), 342–346.Google Scholar
Hyland, K.
(1996) Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17 (4), 433–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text, 18 (3), 349–382.Google Scholar
(2005) Metadiscourse: exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Jacobs, K., & Spierings, N.
(2019) A populist paradise? Examining populists’ Twitter adoption and use. Information, Communication & Society, 22 (12), 1681–1696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, P. J., & Knox, C. C.
(2016) Hurricanes and hegemony: A qualitative analysis of micro-level climate change denial discourses. Environmental Politics, 831–852. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A.
(2009) Introduction. In Jaffe, A. (Ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaidka, K., Zhou, A., & Lelkes, Y.
(2019) Brevity is the soul of Twitter: The constraint affordance and political discussion. Journal of Communication, 69 (4), 345–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jang, S. M., & Hart, P. S.
(2015) Polarized frames on “climate change” and “global warming” across countries and states: Evidence from Twitter big data. Global Environmental Change, 32 1, 11–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, F., & Hyland, K.
(2015) ‘The fact that’: Stance nouns in disciplinary writing. Discourse Studies, 17 (5), 529–550. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knight, G., & Greenberg, J.
(2011) Talk of the enemy: Adversarial framing and climate change discourse. Social Movement Studies, 10 (4), 323–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knoblock, N.
(2020) Negotiating dominance on Facebook : Positioning of self and others in pro- and anti-Trump comments on immigration. Discourse & Society, 31 (5), 520–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kovaka, K.
(2021) Climate change denial and beliefs about science. Synthese, 198 (3), 2355–2374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leombruni, L. V.
(2015) How you talk about climate change matters: A communication network perspective on epistemic skepticism and belief strength. Global Environmental Change, 35 1, 148–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leuckert, S., & Leuckert, M.
(2020) Towards a digital sociolinguistics: Communities of practice on Reddit. In Rüdiger, S., Dayter, D. (Eds.), Corpus approaches to social media (pp. 15–40). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liimatta, A.
(2019) Exploring register variation on Reddit. Register Studies, 1 (2), 269–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lijffijt, J., Nevalainen, T., Säily, T., Papapetrou, P., Puolamäki, K., & Mannila, H.
(2016) Significance testing of word frequencies in corpora. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 31 (2), 374–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massanari, A.
(2017) #Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society, 19 (3), 329–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Medimorec, S., & Pennycook, G.
(2015) The language of denial: text analysis reveals differences in language use between climate change proponents and skeptics. Climatic Change, 133 (4), 597–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, C., & Chuang, L.
(2017) Redditors revealed: Motivational factors of the Reddit community. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 2313–2322). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers, G.
(1989) The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10 (1), 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers, K. F., Doran, P. T., Cook, J., Kotcher, J. E., & Myers, T. A.
(2021) Consensus revisited: quantifying scientific agreement on climate change and climate expertise among Earth scientists 10 years later. Environmental Research Letters, 16 (10). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Robertson, C. T., Eddy, K., & Nielsen, R. K.
(2022) Reuters Institute digital news report 2022. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.Google Scholar
Oz, M., Zheng, P., & Chen, G. M.
(2018) Twitter versus Facebook: Comparing incivility, impoliteness, and deliberative attributes. New Media & Society, 20 (9), 3400–3419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C.
(2001) Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics, 12 (1), 47–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L., Steg, L., Böhm, G., & Fisher, S.
(2019) Climate change perceptions and their individual-level determinants: A cross-European analysis. Global Environmental Change, 55 1, 25–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing [WWW Document]. https://​www​.R​-project​.org/
Rayson, P., Archer, D., Piao, S. L., & McEnery, T.
(2004) The UCREL semantic analysis system. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Beyond Named Entity Recognition Semantic Labelling for NLP Tasks in Association with 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2004), 25th May 2004, Lisbon, Portugal (pp. 7–12). Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
Robards, B.
(2018) Belonging and neo-tribalism on social media site Reddit. In Hardy, A., Bennett, A., Robards, B. (Eds.), Neo-tribes: Consumption, leisure and tourism (pp. 187–206). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H.-J.
(2000) English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: From corpus to cognition. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, J. M.
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Titak, A., & Roberson, A.
(2013) Dimensions of web registers: an exploratory multi-dimensional comparison. Corpora, 8 (2), 235–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tranter, B., & Booth, K.
(2015) Scepticism in a changing climate: A cross-national study. Global Environmental Change, 33 1, 154–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Twint project
(2021) TWINT – Twitter Intelligence Tool [Github repository], https://​github​.com​/twintproject​/twint. Accessed 2.8.2022.
Vassileva, I.
(2001) Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 20 (1), 83–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vulpe, S.
(2020) Cooling down the future. A discourse analysis of climate change skepticism. The Social Science Journal, 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, B.
(2018) Evidentials and epistemic modality. In Aikhenvald, A. Y. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality (pp. 84–108). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, H. T. P., McMurray, J. R., Kurz, T., & Lambert, F. H.
(2015) Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 32 1, 126–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
World Meteorological Organization
(2022) State of the Global Climate 2021 (WMO-No. 1290). Geneva: World Meteorological Organization.Google Scholar
Zappavigna, M.
(2014) CoffeeTweets: bonding around the bean on Twitter. In Seargeant, P., Tagg, C. (Eds.), The language of social media (pp. 139–160). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, M., & Martin, J. R.
(2018) #Communing affiliation: Social tagging as a resource for aligning around values in social media. Discourse, Context & Media, 22 1, 4–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar