Article published in:
Register and social media
Edited by Isobelle Clarke and Jack Grieve
[Register Studies 4:2] 2022
► pp. 263287
Baumgartner, J., Zannettou, S., Keegan, B., Squire, M., & Blackburn, J.
(2020) The Pushshift Reddit Dataset. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 14 (1), 830–839. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berber Sardinha, T., & Veirano Pinto, M.
(2014) Multi-dimensional analysis, 25 years on: A tribute to Douglas Biber. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
(1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) An analytical framework for register studies. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 31–56). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2014) Using multi-dimensional analysis to explore cross-linguistic universals of register variation. Languages in Contrast, 14 (1), 7–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
(2001) Introduction: Multi-dimensional analysis and the study of register variation. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies (pp. 3–12). Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
(2009) Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Csomay, E., Jones, J. K., & Keck, C.
(2004) A corpus linguistic investigation of vocabulary-based discourse units in university registers. In U. Connor & T. A. Upton (Eds.), Applied Corpus Linguistics: A Multidimensional Perspective (pp. 53–72). Rodopi.Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Egbert, J.
(2016) Register variation on the searchable web: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English Linguistics, 44 (2), 95–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Register variation online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Egbert, J., & Davies, M.
(2015) Exploring the composition of the searchable web: A corpus-based taxonomy of web registers. Corpora, 10 (1), 11–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Egbert, J., & Keller, D.
(2020) Reconceptualizing register in a continuous situational space. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 16 (3), 581–616. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B.
(2013) Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. The Journal of English Linguistics, 41 1, 104–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Kurjian, J.
(2007) Towards a taxonomy of web registers and text types: A multi-dimensional analysis. In M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf, & C. Biewer (Eds.), Corpus linguistics and the web (pp. 109–132). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Clarke, I., & Grieve, J.
(2017) Dimensions of abusive language on Twitter. In Z. Waseem, W. Hui Kyong, D. Hovy, & J. Tetreault (Eds.), Proceedings of the first workshop on abusive language online (pp. 1–10). Vancouver: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) Stylistic variation on the Donald Trump Twitter account: A linguistic analysis of tweets posted between 2009 and 2018. PLoS ONE, 14 (9). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conrad, S., & Biber, D.
(Eds.) (2001) Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Covington, M. A., & McFall, J. D.
(2010) Cutting the Gordian knot: The moving-average type-token ratio (MATTR). Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 17 (2), 94–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Davies, M.
(2015) Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66 (9), 1817–1831. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friginal, E.
(Ed.) (2013) Twenty-five ears of Biber’s multi-dimensional analysis [Special issue]. Corpora, 8 (2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic press.Google Scholar
Grieve, J., Biber, D., Friginal, E., & Nekrasova, T.
(2011) Variation among blog text types: A multi-dimensional analysis. In A. Mehler, S. Sharoff, & M. Santini (Eds.), Genres on the web: Corpus studies and computational models (pp. 302–322). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Hess, C. W., Haug, H. T., & Landry, R. G.
(1989) The reliability of type-token ratios for the oral language of school age children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32 1, 536–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hess, C. W., Sefton, K. M., & Landry, R. G.
(1986) Sample size and type-token ratios for oral language of preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29 1, 129–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koizumi, R., & In’nami, Y.
(2012) Effects of text length on lexical diversity measures: Using short texts with less than 200 tokens. System, 40 (4), 554–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kubát, M., & Milička, J.
(2013) Vocabulary richness measure in genres. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 20 (4), 339–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liimatta, A.
(2019) Exploring register variation on Reddit: A multi-dimensional study of language use on a social media website. Register Studies, 1 (2), 269–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) Using lengthwise scaling to compare feature frequencies across text lengths on Reddit. In S. Rüdiger & D. Dayter (Eds.), Corpus approaches to social media (pp. 111–130). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2022) Register variation across text lengths: Evidence from social media. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manning, C. D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S. J., & McClosky, D.
(2014) The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations (pp. 55–60). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shi, Y., & Lei, L.
(2020) Lexical richness and text length: An entropy-based perspective. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 29 (1), 62–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Titak, A., & Roberson, A.
(2013) Dimensions of web registers: An exploratory multi-dimensional comparison. Corpora, 8 (2), 239–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar