Cyclic AGREE derives restrictions
on cliticization in classical Arabic
Person based restrictions on clitic combinations serve as testing grounds for theories of syntactic locality and the means of avoiding them as windows into last resort mechanisms. Clitic restrictions in the verbal domain in Classical Arabic can be derived by Cyclic AGREE, rather than (defective) intervention. This offers a unified, syntactic analysis of the ultrastrong Person Case Constraint and restrictions on combinations of third person clitics. The alternative structures used when cliticization is blocked are the PF realization of independently established syntactic relations, not a last resort mechanism. Several properties of person restrictions are shown to follow from the causative structure of double object verbs in Classical Arabic.
References
Adger, D., & Harbour, D
(
2007)
The syntax and syncretisms of the person case constraint.
Syntax, 10, 2–37.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anagnostopoulou, E
(
2003)
The syntax of ditransitives: Evidence from clitics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, M
(
1988)
Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Béjar, S
(
2003)
Phi-syntax: A theory of agreement. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.
Béjar, S., & ezáč, M
(
2009)
Cyclic agree.
Linguistic Inquiry, 40(1), 35–73.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bobaljik, J.D
(
2008)
Where’s phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In
D. Harbour,
D. Adger, &
S. Béjar (Eds.),
Phi-theory: Phi features across interfaces and modules (pp. 295–328). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonet, E
(
1991)
Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonet, E
(
1994)
The person-case constraint: A morphological approach. In
H. Harley, &
C. Phillips (Eds.),
The morphology-syntax connection, number 22 in MIT working papers in linguistics (pp. 33–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brockelmann, C
(
1960)
Arabische Grammatik. Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopadie.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cardinaletti, A., & Starke, M
(
1999)
The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In
H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.),
Clitics in the languages of Europe (pp. 145–233). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N
(
2000)
Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In
R. Martin,
D. Michaels, &
J. Uriagareka (Eds.),
Step by step: Essays on minimalism in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N
(
2001)
Derivation by phase. In
M. Kenstowicz (Ed.),
Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cuervo, M.C
(
2003)
Datives at large. Unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Sacy, A.I.S
(
1905)
Grammaire arabe (Vol. 2, 3rd edn). Société anonyme de l’imprimerie rapide, Tunis, (first edition 1810).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fassi Fehri, A
(
1988)
Agreement in Arabic, binding and coherence. In
M. Barlow, &
C.A. Ferguson (eds.),
Agreement in natural language: Approaches, theories, descriptions (pp. 107–158). Stanford, CT: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halle, M., and Marantz, A
(
1993)
Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In
K. Hale, &
S. Keyser (Eds.),
The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harley, H. & Ritter, E
(
2002)
Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis.
Language, 78(3), 482–526.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Howell, M.S
(
1880)
A grammar of the classical Arabic language in four parts. Allahabad: North-Western Provinces and Oudh Government Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jahn, G
(
1900)
Ŝıbawaihi’s Buch ü ber die Grammatik (Vol. 2). Berlin: Reuther & Reichard.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lane, E.W
(
1863)
An Arabic-English lexicon. London: Williams and Norgate, London.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marantz, A
(
1991)
Case and licensing. In
G. Westphal,
B. Ao, &
H.-R. Chae (Eds.),
Proceedings of ESCOL ’91 (pp. 234–253). Ithaca, NY: Cornell Linguistics Club.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McFadden, T
(
2004)
The position of morphological case in the derivation: A study on the syntax-morphology interface. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Nevins, A
(
2007)
The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25, 273–313.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ormazabal, J. & Romero, J
(
2007)
The object agreement constraint.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25, 315–347.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perlmutter, D.M
(
1971)
Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pesetsky, D
(
2012).
Russian case morphology and the syntactic categories. Unpublished manuscript, MIT.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Postal, P.M
(
1990)
French indirect object demotion. In
P. M.Postal, &
B.D. Joseph (Eds.),
Studies in relational grammar 3 (pp. 104–200). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Preminger, O
(
2011a)
Agreement as a fallible operation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Preminger, O
(
2011b)
Asymmetries between person and number in syntax: A commentary on Baker’s SCOPA.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 29, 917–937.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pylkkänen, L
(
2002)
Introducing arguments. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Reckendorf, H
(
1895)
Die Syntaktischen Verhä ltnisse des Arabischen. Leiden: 1895–1898.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
ezáč, M
(
2003).
The fine structure of cyclic agree.
Syntax, 6(2), 156–182.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
ezáč, M
(
2007)
Escaping the person case constraint: Reference-set computation in the φ -system.
Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 6, 97–138.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
ezáč, M
(
2008)
The syntax of eccentric agreement: The person case constraint and ansolutive displacement in Basque.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 26, 61–106.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
ezáč, M
(
2011)
Phi-features and the modular architecture of language. Dordrecht: Springer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sibawayh, A. i. U
(
1881)
Le Livre de Ŝıbawaihi, traité Arabe, Volume 1. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Craenenbroeck, J., & van Koppen, M
(
2002)
The locality of agreement and the CP-domain.
Handout, GLOW 25,
April 9–11 2002.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walkow, M
(
2012a)
Goals, big and small. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walkow, M
(
2012b)
The syntax of the person case constraint drives morphological impoverishment of clitics. In
J. Choi,
E.A. Hogue,
J. Punske,
D. Tat,
J. Schertz, &
A. Trueman (Eds.),
Proceedings of the poster session of 29th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, volume 20 of Coyote Papers: Working Papers in Linguistics. Phoenix, AZ: University of Arizona Linguistics Circle.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walkow, M
(
2013)
Locating variation in person restrictions.
University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 19(1), article 28.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wright, W
(
1874)
A grammar of the Arabic language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Foley, Steven & Maziar Toosarvandani
2020.
Extending the Person-Case Constraint to Gender: Agreement, Locality, and the Syntax of Pronouns.
Linguistic Inquiry ► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.