Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXVIII: Papers from the Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Gainesville, Florida, 2014
Edited by Youssef A. Haddad and Eric Potsdam
[Studies in Arabic Linguistics 4] 2016
► pp. 63–88

L1-English tense-lax vowel system influence on L2-Arabic

| University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
| University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

The current study investigates the production and perception of Arabic short and long vowels by two groups of adult L1-English/L2-Arabic learners who differ in their length of exposure to Arabic. An ABX discrimination task and a production task, followed by a native judgment task, were conducted to assess perception and production. The results show that discrimination performance is better than production overall, and also that the learners transfer their L1-English tense-lax phonological system to produce Arabic short-long vowels. We also observe that the transfer involves not only duration, but also spectral aspects of the L1. Lastly, our analyses suggest that more than appropriate durations are involved in pronouncing Arabic short and long vowels correctly.

Keywords: Arabic vowels, L1 transfer, phonology and phonetics, second language learning
Published online: 25 May 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.4.03lab
References
Abdel Salam M., Fahmi S., Gamal N., Hegazi M., Kotby M.N., Nabil A., & Saleh M
(2011) The Arabic vowels: Features and possible clinical applications in communication disorders. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 63, 171-177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abou Haidar, L
(1994) Norme linguistique et variabilité dialectale: analyse formantique du système vocalique de la langue arabe. Revue de Phonétique Appliquée, 110, 1-15.Google Scholar
Al-Ani, S.H
(1970) Arabic phonology: An acoustical and physiological investigation. Netherlands: Mouton and Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohn, O., Flege, J., & Jang, S
(1997) Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437-470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohn, O
(1995) Cross-language speech perception in adults: first language transfer doesn’t tell it all. In W. strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 279-304). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Escudero, P
(2007) Learning to perceive a smaller L2 vowel inventory: An optimality theory account. In P. Avery, E. Dresher, & K. Rice, (Eds.), Contrast in phonology: Theory, perception, acquisition (pp. 271-301). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & M. Halle
(1968) The sound pattern of English. London: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
de Jong, K., Hao, Y., & Park, H
(2009) Evidence for featural units in the acquisition of speech production skills: Linguistic structure in foreign accent. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 357-373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Simon, E., & Mitterer, H
(2012) The perception of English front vowels by North Holland and Flemish listeners: Acoustic similarity predicts and explains cross-linguistic and L2 perception. Journal of Phonetics, 40(2), 280-288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Field, A.P
(2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th edition). London: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
Flege, J., & Fletcher K
(1992) Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived foreign accent. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 91(1), 370-389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghazeli, S
(1979) Du statut des voyelles en arabe. Analyses-Théories, Etudes Arabes, 2(3), 199-219.Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, J., Clark, M., & Houde, R
(2000) Some effects of duration on vowel recognition. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 108, 3013–3022. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hillenbrand, J., Getty, L., Clark, M., & Wheeler, K
(1995) Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3099–3111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holden, K.T., & Neary T.M
(1986) A preliminary report on three Russian dialects: Vowel perception and production. Russian Language Journal, 40, 3-21.Google Scholar
Ingram, J. & Park, S-G
(1997) Cross-language vowel perception and production by Japanese and Korean learners of English. Journal of phonetics, 25(3), 343-370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Language, context, and speaker effects in the identification and discrimination of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese and Korean learners. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 103, 1161–1174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iverson, P. & Evans, B
(2009) Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers. Journal of Acoustical society of America, 122, 2842-2854. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jongman, A., Fourakis, M., & Sereno, J
(1989) The acoustic vowel space of Modern Greek and German. Language and Speech, 32, 221-248.Google Scholar
Kondaurova, M. & Francis, A
(2008) The relationship between native allophonic experience with vowel duration and perception of the English tense/lax vowel contrast by Spanish and Russian listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(6), 3959-3971. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McAllister, R., Flege, J., & Piske, T
(2002) The influence of L1 on the acquisition of Swedish quantity by native speakers of Spanish, English and Estonian. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 229–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitleb, F
(1981) Timing of English vowels spoken with an Arabic accent. Research in Phonetics, 2, 193-226.Google Scholar
(1983) Vowel length contrast in Arabic and English: A spectrographic test. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 73, 29-29.Google Scholar
Most, T., Levin, I., & Sarsour, M
(2008) The effect of modern standard Arabic orthography on speech production by Arab children with hearing loss. Journal of Deaf Studies, 13, 417–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, M
(1993) Productions of English vowels by native speakers of Arabic: Acoustic measurements and accentedness ratings. Language and Speech, 36(1), 39-66.Google Scholar
Newman, D. & Verhoeven, J
(2002) Frequency analysis of Arabic in connected speech, Antwerp Papers in Linguistics, 100, 77-86.Google Scholar
Park, H. & de Jong, K
(2008) Perceptual category mapping between English and Korean prevocalic obstruents: Evidence from mapping effects in second language identification skills. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 704-723. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryding, K
(2005) A reference grammar of modern standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saadah, E
(2011) The production of Arabic vowels by English L2 learners and heritage speakers of Arabic. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Strange, W
(1995) Cross-language studies of speech perception: A historical review. Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience Issues in Cross language research , 3-45.
Strange, W., Akaihane-Yamada, I., Kubo, R., Trent, S.A., Nishi, K., & James, J.J
(1998) Perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 311-344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsukada, K
(2011) The perception of Arabic and Japanese short and long vowels by native speakers of Arabic, Japanese, and Persian. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(2), 989-998. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watt, D
(2002) I don’t speak with a Geordie accent, I speak, like, the Northern accent: contact included leveling in the Tyneside vowel system. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6(1), 44-63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar