Cover not available
Part of
Arabic in Contact
Edited by Stefano Manfredi and Mauro Tosco
[Studies in Arabic Linguistics 6] 2018
► pp. 207–232

Why linguistics needs an historically oriented Arabic linguistics

| Bayreuth University

One of the more recent, and certainly one of the most empirically well-founded accounts of language change is Labov’s (2007) division between transmission and diffusion. The former results in gradual change via incrementation, the latter in larger and irregular change. This study examines the generality of this distinction, which was based on American vowel systems, against the rich history of Arabic. Five case studies are described in which it is shown that Arabic, like English, has striking instances of language stability across varieties as geo-diachronically separated as Emirati and Nigerian Arabic. By the same token, there are equally striking instances of widespread change due to contact. It is argued that in only one of these, Nubi (Creole Arabic), can diffusional changes be considered irregular, while in three others, Baghdadi Arabic (phonology), Uzbekistan or Central Asian Mixed Arabic (morphology and syntax) and Nigerian Arabic (semantics of idioms), the changes though of differing degrees of magnitude in their outcomes, cannot be said to be irregular. The study highlights two points: global criteria for defining the outcomes of transmission vs. diffusion are elusive, and Arabic, because of the ability to triangulate into different phases of its past, offers an unusually interesting insight into the workings of historical linguistic processes.

Keywords: transmission, diffusion, incrementation, language stability, idiomatic change, creoles, mixed languages, Baghdadi Arabic, Nubi, Central Asian, Mixed Arabic
Article outline
  • 1. Transmission and diffusion
  • 2.Triangulation, chronological transparency
  • 3.A baseline measure of stability
  • 4.Four examples of linguistic change
    • 4.1 Syllabification
    • 4.2Semantic change
    • 4.3Mixed Arabic: Uzbekistan and Afghanistan
    • 4.4The limits of Arabic: Creole Arabic
  • 5.Transmission and diffusion
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 10 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.6.11owe
References
Al-Rawi, Rosina
(1990) Studien zum Arabischen Dialekt von Abu Daby. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter
(1997) A Language of our own. The genesis of Michif, the mixed Cree-French language of the Canadian Métis. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Behnstedt, Peter
(1997) Sprachatlas von Syrien. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Bergsträsser, Gotthelf
(1928 [1977]) Einführung in die semitischen Sprachen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek
(1981) Roots of language. Ann Arbor: Koroma.Google Scholar
Blanc, Haim
(1964) Communal dialects in Baghdad. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Blau, Joshua
(2002) A handbook of Middle Arabic. Jerusalem: Magnes Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle
(1993) On proposed universals of grammatical borrowing. In Henk Aertsen and Robert Jeffers (eds.). Historical Linguistics 1989, 91–110. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, Terrence Kaufman and Thomas Smith-Stark
(1986) Meso-America as a linguistic area. Language 62: 530–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Contini, Riccardo
(1999) Le Substrat Araméen en néo-Arabe Libanais: Préliminaires a une enquête systématique. In Marcello Lamberti and Livia Tonelli (eds.), Afroasiatica Tergestina, 101–122. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
de Landberg, le Comte
(1909) Etudes sur les Dialectes de l’Arabe Méridionale. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Erwin, Wallace
(1963) A short reference grammar of Iraqi Arabic. Washington D. C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Wolfdietrich
(1961) Die Sprache der arabischen Sprachninsesl in Uzbekistan. Der Islam 36: 232–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Alan
(ed.) (2007) Morphologies of Asia and Africa. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul, Eivind Torgersen and Susan Fox
(2008) Reversing drift: Innovation and diffusion in the London diphthong system. Language Variation and Change 20: 451–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kieffer, Charles
(2000) The Arabic speech of Bactria (Afghanistan). In Jonathan Owens (ed.), Arabic as a minority language, 181–198. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kisseberth, Charles
(2011) Conspiracies. In Marc Osstendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume and Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology. Oxford: Blackwells. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
(2007) Transmission and diffusion, Language 83: 344–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larcher, Pierre
(2001) Moyen arabe et Arabe moyen. Arabica 48: 578–609. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipiński, Edward
(2000) The Aramaeans, their ancient history, culture, religion. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Macuch, Rudolph
(1982) Grammatik des samaritanischen Aramäischen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malaika, Nisar
(1959) Grundzüge der Grammatik des arabischen Dialektes von Bagdad. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Malone, Joseph
(1971) Wave theory, rule ordering and Hebrew-Aramaic segolation. JAOS 91: 44–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997) Modern and classical Mandaic phonology. In Alan Kaye (ed.), Phonologies of Asia and Africa 1, 141–59Winona Lake. Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John
(1998) Identifying the Creole prototype: Vindicating a typological class. Language 74: 788–818. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) The rest of the story: Restoring pidginization to creole genesis theory. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 17(1): 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Language interrupted: Signs of non-native acquisition in standard language grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Case closed? Testing the feature pool hypothesis. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 27: 171–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko
(2009) Restructuring, hybridization, and complexity in language evolution. In Enoch Aboh and Norval Smith (eds.), Complex processes in new languages, 367–401. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) SLA and the emergence of creoles. Second Language Acquisition 32: 359–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moulton, William
(1954) The stops and spirants of early Germanic. Language 30: 1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muraoka, Takamitsu
(1997) Classical Syriac. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Nöldeke, Theodor
(1898) Kurzgefasste Syrische Grammatik, Leipzig, Chr. Tauchnitz.Google Scholar
Operstein, Natalie
(2014) Contact-genetic linguistics: toward a contact-based theory of language change. Language Sciences 48: 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Owens, Jonathan
(1994) Nigerian Arabic in comparative perspective. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 14: 85–175.Google Scholar
(1996) Idiomatic structure and the theory of genetic relationship. Diachronica 13: 283–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997) Arabic-based pidgins and creoles. In Sarah Thomason (ed.), Contact languages: A wider perspective (pp.125–172). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Neighborhood and ancestry: Variation in the spoken Arabic of Maiduguri. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Arabic dialect history and historical linguistic mythology. JAOS 123: 715–740. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006/2009) A linguistic history of Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013a) A house of sound structure, of marvellous form and proportion: an introduction. In J. Owens (ed.) The Oxford handbook of Arabic linguistics (pp.1–22). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013b) ‘The historical linguistics of the intrusive *-n in Arabic and West Semitic.’ JAOS 133: 217–247.Google Scholar
(2014a) The morphologization of an Arabic creole. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Linguistics 29: 232–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014b) Many heads are better than one: The spread of motivated opacity via contact. Linguistics 52: 125–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015a) Idioms, polysemy, context: A model based on Nigerian Arabic. Anthropological Linguistics 57: 46–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b) Arabic language history and the comparative method. International Journal of Arabic Linguistics 1: 1–27.Google Scholar
(2017) Dia-planar diffusion: Reconstructing early Aramaic-Arabic language contact. In Manuel Sartori, Manuela Giolfo, and Philippe Cassuto (eds.). Approaches to the history and dialectology of Arabic in honor of Pierre Larcher (pp. 77–101). Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar
Owens, Jonathan and Robin Dodsworth
(2009) Stability in Subject-Verb Word Order: From Contemporary Arabian Peninsular Arabic to Biblical Aramaic. Anthropological Linguistics 51: 151–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Semantic mapping: What happens to idioms in discourse. Linguistics 55: 641–682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Owens, Jonathan, Bill Young, Trent Rockwood, David Mehall, Robin Dodsworth
(2010) Explaining Ø and Overt Subjects in Spoken Arabic. In Jonathan Owens and Elgibali eds., Information structure in spoken Arabic (pp.20–60). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Owens, Jonathan, Robin Dodsworth and Mary Kohn
(2013) Subject expression and discourse embeddedness in Emirati Arabic. Language Variation and Change 25: 255–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carole
(1988) On constraint and repair strategies. The Linguistic Review 6: 71–97.Google Scholar
Retsö, Jan
(1988) Pronominal suffixes with –n(n)- in Arabic dialects and other Semitic languages. Zeitschrift für arabische Linguistik 18: 77–94.Google Scholar
(2000) Kaškaša, t-passives and the dialect geography of ancient Arabia. Oriente Moderno 19: 111–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) The Arabs in antiquity. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
Ritt-Benmimoun, Veronika, Smaranda Grigore, Jocelyne Owens and Jonathan Owens
(2017) Three idioms, three dialects, one history. Tunisian and Libyan Arabic Dialect Common Trends – Recent Developments – Diachronic Aspects (Colección Estudios de Dialectología Árabe) (pp.43–84). Zaragoza: University of Zaragoza Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Franz
(1961) A grammar of Biblical Aramaic. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Segert, Stanslav
(1997) Old Aramaic Phonology. In Alan Kaye (ed.), Phonologies of Africa and Asia, 115–126Winona Lake, Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Segert, Stanislav
(2007) Old Aramaic morphology. Morphologies of Asia and Africa, Kaye (ed.). Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns (pp.121–134).Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah and Terrence Kaufman
(1988) Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Versteegh, Kees
(1984) Pidginization and creolization: The case of Arabic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1984–86) Word Order in Uzbekistan Arabic and Universal Grammar. Orientalia Suecana 33–35: 443–453.Google Scholar
Voigt, Rainer
(2007) Mandaic. Morphologies of Asia and Africa, Kaye (ed.). Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 149–68.Google Scholar
Wellens, Ineke
(2005) The Nubi language of Uganda. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Windfuhr, Gernot
(2005) “Central Asian Arabic: The Irano-Arabic Dynamics of a New Perfect”. In Eva Csató, Bo Isaksson and Carina Jahani (eds.). Linguistic Convergence and Areal Diffusion (pp.111–126). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vollers, Karl
(1906 [1981]) Volkssprache und Schriftsprache im alten Arabien. Amsterdam: Oriental Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Geritt
(2002) Das Arabische von Buchara zwischen alten Quellen und neuen Forschungergebnissen. Magisterarbeit: Bayreuth University.Google Scholar
(2009) “Uzbekistan Arabic”. In Kees Versteegh et al. (eds.), EALL, vol. IV, (pp.612–623). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Online resource

Owens, J. and Jidda Hassan
In their own voices, in their own words: A corpus of spoken Nigerian Arabic. [URL].