Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXX: Papers from the annual symposia on Arabic Linguistics, Stony Brook, New York, 2016 and Norman, Oklahoma, 2017
Edited by Amel Khalfaoui and Matthew A. Tucker
[Studies in Arabic Linguistics 7] 2019
► pp. 7–32

How to delete

| University of Massachusetts Amherst
Using data from Arabic and other languages, this chapter argues that segmental deletion processes are gradual in the sense that segments are lost through attrition rather than all at once. The argument is framed within Harmonic Serialism, a derivational version of Optimality Theory that allows deletion processes to be decomposed into successive reduction steps.
Keywords: Optimality Theory, Harmonic Serialism, deletion
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.About Harmonic Serialism
  • 3.Deletion as gradual reduction: An example
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Structure and deletability
  • 6.Deletion of fuller segments implies deletion of more reduced segments
  • 7.Every deletion context is also a reduction context
  • 8.Consequence: Segments have internal structure
  • 9.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgment
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.7.02mcc
References (87)
References
Abu-Mansour, M. H. 1987. A nonlinear analysis of Arabic syllabic phonology, with special reference to Makkan. (Ph.D. dissertation), University of Florida.Google Scholar
1991. Epenthesis in Makkan Arabic: Unsyllabifiable consonants versus degenerate syllables. In M. Eid & J. J. McCarthy (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics III: Papers from the Third Annual Symposium on Arabic linguistics (pp.137–159). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Al-Mozainy, H. Q. 1981. Vowel alternations in a Bedouin Hijazi Arabic dialect: Abstractness and stress. (Ph.D. dissertation), University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Angoujard, J.-P. 1990. Metrical structure of Arabic. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archangeli, D. 1988. Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology 5, 183–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bagemihl, B. 1988. Alternate phonologies and morphologies. (Ph.D. dissertation), University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Baković, E. 2005. Antigemination, assimilation and the determination of identity. Phonology 22(3), 279–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birkeland, H. 1940. Altarabische Pausalformen. Oslo: Jacob Dybwad.Google Scholar
Bliese, L. F. 1981. A generative grammar of Afar. Dallas: The Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Broselow, E. 1979. Cairene Arabic syllable structure. Linguistic Analysis 5, 345–382.Google Scholar
1992. Parametric variation in Arabic dialect phonology. In E. Broselow, M. Eid & J. J. McCarthy (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics (Vol. 4, pp.7–45). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cantineau, J. 1939. Remarques sur les parlers sédentaires syro-libano-palestiniens. Bulletin de la Societé de Linguistique de Paris 40, 80–88.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. 1985. The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2, 225–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991. Vowel height assimilation in Bantu languages. In K. Hubbard (Ed.), BLS 17S: Proceedings of the special session on African language structures (pp.25–64). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Coupez, A. 1969. Une leçon de linguistique. Africa-Tervuren 15, 33–37.Google Scholar
Cowell, M. 1965. A reference grammar of Syrian Arabic. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Crosswhite, K. 2004. Vowel reduction. In B. Hayes, R. Kirchner & D. Steriade (Eds.), Phonetically based phonology (pp.191–231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, S., & Zawaydeh, B. A. 2001. Arabic hypocoristics and the status of the consonantal root. Linguistic Inquiry 32(3), 512–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doak, I. 1990. Truncation, í-suffixation, and extended vowel length in Coeur d'Alene. Papers for the 25th international conference on Salish and neighbouring languages. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia.
el-Hajjé, H. 1954. Le parler de Tripoli (Liban)Le parler de Tripoli (Liban). Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Farwaneh, S. 1995. Directionality effects in Arabic dialect syllable structure. (Ph.D. dissertation), University of Utah.Google Scholar
Gesenius, W. 1910. Gesenius' Hebrew grammar, as edited and enlarged by the late E. Kautzsch. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. (Ph.D. dissertation), MIT.Google Scholar
1990. Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gouskova, M. 2003. Deriving economy: syncope in Optimality Theory. (Ph.D. dissertation), University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. 1950. The patterning of root morphemes in Semitic. Word 6, 162–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenstein, E. L. 1984. The phonology of Akkadian syllable structure. Afroasiatic Linguistics 9(1), 1–71.Google Scholar
Hall, E., Jurgec, P., & Kawahara, S. (to appear). Opaque allomorph selection in Japanese and Harmonic Serialism: A reply to Kurisu 2012. Linguistic Inquiry.Google Scholar
Hamid, A. H. M. 1984. A descriptive analysis of Sudanese Colloquial Arabic phonology. (Ph.D. dissertation), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Hartkemeyer, D. 1997. Romancing the vowels: An optimality-theoretic account of vowel loss from Vulgar Latin to early Western Romance. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 27(1), 99–118.Google Scholar
2000. *V: An Optimality-Theoretic examination of vowel loss phenomena, with special reference to Latin, Early Western Romance, and Basque. (Ph.D. dissertation), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Hawkins, W. N. 1950. Patterns of vowel loss in Macushi (Carib). International Journal of American Linguistics 16, 87–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayward, K. M., Hayward, R. J., & Al-Tabūki, S. B. 1988. Vowels in Jibbāli verbs. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 51, 240–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoberman, R. 2005. Pausal forms. In C. H. M. Versteegh & M. Eid (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics (Vol. III). Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Hoijer, H. 1933. Tonkawa. An Indian language of Texas. In F. Boas & H. Hoijer (Eds.), Handbook of American Indian languages. New York: J.J. Augustin.Google Scholar
1946. Tonkawa. In H. Hoijer (Ed.), Linguistic structures of Native America (pp.289–311). New York: Viking Fund.Google Scholar
Hombert, J.-M. 1973. Speaking backwards in Bakwiri. Studies in African Linguistics 4, 227–236.Google Scholar
1986. Word games: Some implications for analysis of tone and other phonological constructs. In J. J. Ohala & J. J. Jaeger (Eds.), Experimental phonology (pp.175–186). Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Huehnergard, J. 2005. A grammar of Akkadian (second edition). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. 2002. Is there a right-to-left bias in vowel harmony? Paper presented at 9th International Phonology Meeting, Vienna.Google Scholar
Ito, J. 1989. A prosodic theory of epenthesis. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 7, 217–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, H. 2004. Rhythmic vowel deletion in OT: Syncope in Latin. Probus 16, 63–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, N. G. 2005. Yiddish: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., Fant, G., & Halle, M. 1952. Preliminaries to speech analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jeanne, L. 1982. Some phonological rules of Hopi. International Journal of American Linguistics 48, 245–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kenstowicz, M. 1983. Parametric variation and accent in the Arabic dialects. In A. Chukerman, M. Marks & J. F. Richardson (Eds.), Papers from CLS 19 (pp.205–213). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Kurisu, K. 2012. Fell-swoop onset deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 43(2), 309–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lausberg, H. 1939. Die Mundarten Südlukaniens. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Lief, E. 2006. Syncope in Spanish and Portuguese: The diachrony of Hispano-Romance phonotactics. (Ph.D. dissertation), Cornell University.Google Scholar
Maiden, M. 1995. Evidence from the Italian dialects for the internal structure of prosodic domains. In J. C. Smith & M. Maiden (Eds.), Linguistic theory and the Romance languages (pp.115–131). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. J. 1979. On stress and syllabification. Linguistic Inquiry 10, 443–466.Google Scholar
1986. OCP Effects: Gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 207–263.Google Scholar
1988. Feature geometry and dependency: A review. Phonetica 43, 84–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Hidden generalizations: Phonological opacity in Optimality Theory. London: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
2008. The gradual path to cluster simplification. Phonology 25, 271–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. An introduction to Harmonic Serialism. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(10), 1001–1018. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. J., Kimper, W., & Mullin, K. 2012. Reduplication in Harmonic Serialism. Morphology 22(2), 173–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In J. Beckman, L. Walsh Dickey & S. Urbanczyk (Eds.), University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics 18 (pp.249–384). Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
1999. Faithfulness and identity in Prosodic Morphology. In R. Kager, H. van der Hulst & W. Zonneveld (Eds.), The prosody-morphology interface (pp.218–309). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarus, E. N. 1955. Review of Hassan El-Hajjé Le parler arabe de Tripoli (Liban). Language 31(4), 580–584.Google Scholar
Mester, A. 1994. The quantitative trochee in Latin. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 12, 1–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mielke, J. 2008. The emergence of distinctive features. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. F. 1956. An introduction to Egyptian Colloquial Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Owens, J. 2009. A linguistic history of Arabic. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, D. 1990. Accent in Aguaruna. In D. L. Payne (Ed.), Amazonian linguistics: Studies in lowland South American languages (pp.161–184). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schane, S. 1984. The fundamentals of particle phonology. Phonology 1, 129–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spradlin, L. 2016. OMG the word-final alveopalatals are cray-cray prev(alent): The morphophonology of totes constructions in English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics:, 22(1), Article 30.Google Scholar
Steriade, D. 2001. Directional asymmetries in place assimilation. In E. Hume & K. Johnson (Eds.), The role of speech perception in phonology (pp.219–250). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2001/2008. The phonology of perceptibility effects: The P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. In K. Hanson & S. Inkelas (Eds.), The nature of the word: Studies in honor of Paul Kiparsky (pp.151–180). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, L., & Thomason, S. 2004. Truncation in Montana Salish. In D. B. Gerdts & L. Matthweson (Eds.), Studies in Salish linguistics in honor of M. Dale Kinkade (pp.354–376). Missoula, MT: University of Montana Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17.Google Scholar
Trimingham, J. S., & Gairdner, W. H. T. 1946. Sudan colloquial Arabic. London: Oxford University Press G. Cumberlege.Google Scholar
Urbanczyk, S. 1996. Patterns of reduplication in Lushootseed. (Ph.D. dissertation), University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, H. 1989. Atoms of segmental structure: Components, gestures and dependency. Phonology 6, 253–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eijk, J. P. 1997. The Lillooet language: Phonology, morphology, and syntax. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Versteegh, K. 2005. Ḥaraka. In C. H. M. Versteegh & M. Eid (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics (Vol. II). Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Walker, R. 2016. Positional prominence and consonantal interactions in metaphony and post-tonic harmony. In F. Torres-Tamarit, K. Linke & M. van Oostendorp (Eds.), Approaches to metaphony in the languages of Italy (pp.301–332). Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wang, W. S.-Y. 1968. Vowel features, paired variables, and the English vowel shift. Language 44, 695–708. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. C. E. 2002. The phonology and morphology of Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, K. 2002. The realization of final /t/ in Liverpool English. Durham Working Papers in Linguistics 8, 195–205.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. 2007. Syncope and apocope in the history of Catalan: An Optimality Theory approach. University of Sussex. Falmer, Brighton.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. 2001. Consonant cluster neutralization and targeted constraints. Phonology 18, 147–197.Google Scholar
Wright, W. 1971. A grammar of the Arabic language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Youssi, A. 1976. Les parlers secrets: quelques réflexions sur la fonction de dissimulation du langage. Paper presented at the Linguistique et sémiotique, Rabat.Google Scholar
1977. Les parlers secrets au Maroc. La linguistique 13(1), 135–143.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. M. 1972. Note on a phonological hierarchy in English. In R. Stockwell & R. Macaulay (Eds.), Linguistic change and generative theory (pp.275–301). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Lamont, Andrew
2023. Serial Reduplication Is Empirically Adequate and Typologically Restrictive. Linguistic Inquiry 54:4 ► pp. 797 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.