Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXX: Papers from the annual symposia on Arabic Linguistics, Stony Brook, New York, 2016 and Norman, Oklahoma, 2017
Edited by Amel Khalfaoui and Matthew A. Tucker
[Studies in Arabic Linguistics 7] 2019
► pp. 93–112

The syntax of negative coordination in Jordanian Arabic

| Georgetown University
Coordination constructions can either conjoin or disjoin phrases or clauses. Languages vary in the strategies employed to establish these logical relationships, creating distributional contrasts and co-occurrence restrictions on the coordination particles. This paper describes negative coordination and puts forward an analysis for this unexplored topic in Arabic. The paper argues that laa-wala coordination is a disjunction construction distinct from the construction involving two negative phrases/clauses coordinated by wa-. The analysis projects a Disjunction Phrase (DisjP) headed by wala and two DPs/CPs, CP1 for the first disjunct occupying the Spec,DisjP and CP2 for the second disjunct as a complement of DisjP. The analysis shows that wala is a disjunction operator with an uninterpretable negation feature (i.e., an NCI) licensed by a negative operator. With a postverbal DisjP, the negative operator is maa; elsewhere it is a covert negative operator that dominates DisjP. With coordinated DPs, the analysis shows that singular agreement on the verb involves clausal coordination and VP ellipsis in one disjunct.
Keywords: coordination, Arabic, negation, disjunction, ellipsis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction and empirical generalizations
  • 2.Theoretical issues
  • 3.Empirical contrasts between wa- and wala
  • 4.Analysis of negative coordination by wala
    • Status and locus of laa
    • Status and locus of wala as an NCI and disjunction operator
    • Ellipsis
    • Negative coordination and first conjunct agreement
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgment
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.7.06alq
References (32)
References
Alqassas, A. 2015. Negation, tense and NPIs in Jordanian Arabic. Lingua 156, 101–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. Temporal NPIs and NCIs as adverb phrases: The case of Jordanian Arabic. In: Y. A. Haddad & E. Potsdam (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXVIII (pp.129–152). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
2018 Negative sensitive items. In: E. Benmamoun and R. Bassiouney (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics. Routledge.Google Scholar
Aoun, J., Benmamoun, E., & Sportiche, D. 1999. Further remarks on first conjunct agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4), 669–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aoun, J., Benmamoun, E., & Choueiri, L. 2010. The syntax of Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benmamoun, E. 1997. Licensing of negative polarity items in Moroccan Arabic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15, 263–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. Reciprocals as Plurals. Research in Afroasiatic Grammar II . In: J. Lecarme (Ed.), John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Licensing configurations: the puzzle of head negative polarity items, Linguistic Inquiry 37(1), 141–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
De Groot, A. W. 1959. Structurele syntaxis. Den Haag: Servire.Google Scholar
den Dikken, M. 2006. Either-float and the syntax of co-or-dination. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24, 689–749. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodall, G. 1987. Parallel structures in syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Han, C.-H & Romero, M. 2004. The syntax of whether/Q …or questions: Ellipsis combined with movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22, 527–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hankamer, J. 1979. Deletion in coordinate structures. Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. Garland Publishing, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Hendriks, P. 2001. Initial coordination and the law of coordination of likes. In H. Broekhuis and T. van der Wouden (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2001 (pp.127–138). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
2003. Either’ as a focus particle. Manuscript, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
2004. Either, both and neither in coordinate structures. Manuscript, University of Groningen. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoyt, F. 2010. Negative concord in Levantine Arabic. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1977. X-Bar Syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, R. 2010. The Amharic definite marker and the syntax-morphology interface. Syntax 13, 196–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, B. 2013. Arabic Conjunct-Sensitive Agreement and Primitive Operations. Linguistic Inquiry 44(4), 611–631. The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, R. 1985. On the syntax of disjunction Scope. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3, 217–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lobeck, A. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing and identification. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Munn, A. 1993. Topics in the syntax and semantics of coordinate structures. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
1999. First conjunct agreement: Against a clausal analysis. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4), 643–668. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ouali, H. & Soltan, U. 2014. On negative concord in Egyptian and Moroccan Arabic. In S. Farwaneh and H. Ouali (Eds.) Perspectives of Arabic Linguistics XXV(pp.159–180). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Potsdam, E. 1996. Syntactic Issues in the English Imperative. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Ross, J.-R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Schwarz, B. 1999. On the syntax of either …or. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17, 339–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soltan, U. 2007. On agree and postcyclic merge in syntactic derivations: First conjunct agreement in Standard Arabic. In Benmamoun, E., (Ed.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XIX (pp.191–213). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwart, J.-W. 2005. Some notes on coordination in head-final languages. In J. Doetjes & J. van de Weijer (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2005 (pp.231–242). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar