References

References

Aoun, J. E., Benmamoun, E., & Choueiri, L.
(2010) The syntax of Arabic. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bakir, M.
(1980) Aspects of clause structure in Arabic. (Doctoral Dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Brody, M.
(1990) Some remarks on the focus field in Hungarian. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 201–225.Google Scholar
Büring, D.
(1997) On the meaning of topic and focus. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, J.
(2004) On having arguments and agreeing: Semantic EPP. York Papers in Linguistics Series, 2(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1986) Barriers. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1998) Some observations on economy in generative grammar. In P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. McGinnis & D. Pesetsky (Eds.), Is the best good enough (pp. 115–127). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin, R., D. Micheals & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–156). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2001) Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Culicover, P.
(1992) Topicalization, inversion, and complementizers in English. In D. Delfitto, M. Everaert, A. Evers & F. Stuurman (Eds.), OTS working papers: Going Romance and beyond (pp. 1–45). Utrecht: University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Fassi-Fehri, A.
(1993) Issues in the structure of Arabic clauses and word order. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fintel, K. V., & Heim, I.
(2011) Lecture notes in intensional semantics. Ms.: MIT.Google Scholar
Franco, I.
(2012) Verbal stylistic fronting in Old Florentine. Ms.: Leiden University.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, M.
(2007) Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25(4), 691–734. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gutzmann, D., Hartmann, K., & Matthewson, L.
(2017) Verum focus is verum, not focus.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L.
(2006) Argument fronting in English, Romance CLLD, and the left periphery. In R. Zanuttini, H. Campos, E. Herburger, & P. Portner (Eds.), Crosslinguistic research in syntax and semantics: Negation, tense and clausal architecture (pp. 27–52). Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Heim, I., & Kratzer, A.
(1998) Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, J.
(1987) Indefiniteness and predication. In: E. Reuland & A. ter Meulen (Eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness (pp. 43–70). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J.
(1969) Semantics for propositional attitudes. In J. W. Davis, D. J. Hockney & W. K. Wilson (Eds.), Philosophical logic (pp. 21–45). Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Höhle, T. N.
(1992) Über Verum-Fokus im Deutschen. In J. Jacobs (Ed.), Infonnationsstruktur und Grammatik (pp. 112–141). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibn Maalik, M.
(1990) ʃaarħu ʔttashiil (volume 4). Beirut: Dar Al-kotob Al-ilmiyah.Google Scholar
Kratzer, A.
(1995) Stage and individual level predicates. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 125–175). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Krifka, M.
(2008) Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55 (3–4), 243–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P., & Johnson, K.
(2015) A course in phonetics. Connecticut, Stamford: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Larson, R. K.
(1988) On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19 (3), 335–391.Google Scholar
Lohnstein, H., & Stommel, H.
(2009) Verum focus and phases. Linguistic Analysis, 35(1), 109–140.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, S.
(2010) Why Agree? Why Move? Unifying agreement-based and discourse configurational languages. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mohammad, M. A.
(2000) Word order, agreement, and pronominalization in Standard and Palestinian Arabic. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, G., & Sternefeld, W.
(1993) Improper movement and unambiguous binding. Linguistic Inquiry, 24(3), 461–507.Google Scholar
Nissenbaum, J.
(1998) Movement and derived predicates: Evidence from parasitic gaps. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 25, 247–295.Google Scholar
Omar, M., Zahran, M., & Abdullatif, M.
(1994) Al-Nahw-u Al-Asaasijj-u ‘the basic syntax’ (4th Edition). Kuwait: Dar-u Al-Ssalaasil-i.Google Scholar
Ouhalla, J.
(1994) Verb movement and word order in Arabic. In D. Lightfoot & N. Hornstein (Eds.), Verb movement (pp. 41–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Remarks on focus in Standard Arabic. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Series 4, 9–46.Google Scholar
Pollock, J. Y.
(1989) Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20 (3), 365–424.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L.
(1997) The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp. 281–337). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) On the position “Int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause. In G. Cinque, L. Renzi, and G. Salvi (Eds.), Current studies in Italian syntax (pp. 287–296). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
(2004) Locality and left periphery. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond (pp. 223–251). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rooth, M.
(1985) Association with focus. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
(1992) A theory of focus interpretation. Natural language semantics, 1(1), 75–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B.
(1940) An inquiry into meaning and truth. London: George Allen and Unwin LTD.Google Scholar
Sauerland, U.
(1998) Two structures for English restrictive relative clauses: The meaning of chains. (Doctoral dissertation). MIT, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shima, E.
(2000) A preference for Move over Merge. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(2), 375–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shlonsky, U.
(1994) Agreement in comp. The Linguistic Review, 11(3–4), 351–376.Google Scholar
(2000) Remarks on the complementizer layer of Standard Arabic. In J. Lecarme, J. Lowenstamm & U. Shlonsky (Eds.), Research in Afroasiatic grammar: Papers from the third conference on Afroasiatic languages (pp. 325–343). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, H./Á., & Maling, J.
(2007) On null arguments. In M. C. Picci, & A. Pona (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXXII Incontro di Grammatica Generativa (pp. 167–180). Firenze: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, H. Á.
(2010) On EPP effects. Studia Linguistica, 64(2), 159–189.Google Scholar
(2011) Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry, 42(2), 267–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, H. Á., & Maling, J.
(2008) Argument drop and the empty left edge condition (ELEC). Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 81, 1–27.Google Scholar
Soltan, U.
(2007) On agree and postcyclic merge in syntactic derivations: First conjunct agreement in Standard Arabic. In E. Benmamoun (Ed.) Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XIX (pp. 191–213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) On formal feature licensing in minimalism: Aspects of Standard Arabic morphosyntax. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
Stowell, T.
(1991) The alignment of arguments in adjective phrases. Syntax and Semantics, 25, 105–135.Google Scholar