Article published in:
Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education
Vol. 5:2 (2020) ► pp. 258–280

The impact of learning context on L2 Chinese word order structure development

From the beginning

| The Australian National University
Studies on the impact of learning context in second language (L2) acquisition seldom look at ab-initio learners and their learning journey from the very beginning. Consequently, it is difficult to know for certain whether the findings of study-abroad vs. at-home research are applicable to this group of learners. The present study examines six ab-initio learners’ L2 developmental processes of three Chinese word order structures in two settings: China and Australia. The analysis of two longitudinal corpora showed no impact of the learning setting on the acquisition sequence. The impact, however, was found in learning efficiency. Measured by the number of hours of formal instruction, the three learners in Australia progressed faster than the three learners in China although the latter had received much more classroom instruction and were in an immersive environment. The findings suggest that learning an L2 at home is not inferior for early L2 grammatical development.
Keywords: learning context, ab-initio learners, learning processes, acquisition sequences, rate of learning word order
Published online: 07 October 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/sar.16021.zha
References

[ p. 277 ]References

Carroll, S.
(1999) Putting ‘input’ in its proper place. Second Language Research, 15(4), 337–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carson, J. G., & Longhini, A.
(2002) Focusing on learning styles and strategies: A diary study in an immersion setting. Language Learning, 52, 401–438. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chao, Y.-R.
(1968) A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H.
(1984) The acquisition of German word order: A test case for cognitive approaches to second language acquisition. In R. Andersen (Ed.), Second languages (pp. 219–242). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Collentine, J.
(2004) The effects of learning contexts on morphosyntactic and lexical development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 227–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Study abroad research: findings, implications and future directions. In M. H. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 218–233). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collentine, J., & Freed, B.
(2004) Learning context and its effects on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 153–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R.
(1986) From learning to acquisition? Foreign language development in a US classroom and during a semester abroad (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University.Google Scholar
(1991) Foreign language development during a semester abroad. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom (pp.104–119). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
(2007) Study abroad as foreign language practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language. Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 208–229). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Biase, B.
(2008) Focus-on-form and development in L2 learning. In J. Kessler (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning (pp.197–220). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2008) The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G.
(2005) Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Firth, A., & Wagner, J.
(1997) On discourse, communication and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Freed, B., Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, D. P.
(2004) Context of learning and second language fluency in French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 275–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gao, X.
(2005) Noun phrase morphemes and topic development in L2 Mandarin Chinese: A processability perspective (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar
[ p. 278 ]
Gregg, K.
(2006) Taking a social turn for the worse: The language socialization paradigm for second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 22(4), 413–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, M., Roberts, L., Dimroth, C., Veroude, K., & Indefrey, P.
(2010) Adult language learning after minimal exposure to an unknown natural language. Language Learning, 60(2), 5–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, G., & Norrby, G. H. C.
(2010) Environmental influence on language acquisition: Comparing second and foreign language acquisition of Swedish. Language Learning, 60(3), 628–650. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F.
(2009) Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 30(4), 461–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Housen, A., Schoonjans, E., Janssens, S., Welcomme, A., Schoonheere, E., & Pierrard, E.
(2011) Conceptualizing and measuring the impact of contextual factors in instructed SLA – The role of language prominence. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 49(2), 83–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Isabelli, C.
(2000) Motivation and extended interaction in the study abroad context: Factors in the development of Spanish language accuracy and communication skills (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Jiang, W.
(2013) A Look at the word order in spoken Mandarin: A quantitative study (Unpublished MA thesis). University of Canberra.Google Scholar
Krashen, S.
(1980) The input hypothesis. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Current issues in bilingual education (pp.168–180). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K.
(1994) Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P.
(2000) Sociocultural theory and language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Li, C., & Thompson, S. A.
(1981) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Liu, B.
(2016) A processing approach to the L2 acquisition of Chinese syntax (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Liu, X.
(1981) 《实用汉语课本》第一册，第二册（第一版）北京：商务出版社。[ Practical Chinese reader. Book 1 & Book 2 (1st ed.)]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
(2015) 《新实用汉语课本》（第三版）北京：北京语言大学出版社。[ New practical Chinese reader (3rd ed.)]. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University.Google Scholar
Long, M.
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1997) Construct validity in SLA: A response to Firth and Wagner. Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 318–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mansouri, F., & Duffy, L.
(2005) The pedagogic effectiveness of developmental readiness in ESL grammar instruction. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 81–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M.
(1981) On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3(2), 109–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 279 ]
Milton, J., & Meara, P.
(1995) How periods abroad affect vocabulary growth in a foreign language. ITL Review of Applied linguistics, 107–108, 17–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Möhle, D.
(1984) A comparison of the second language speech of different native speakers. In H. W. Dechert, D. Möhle, & M. Raupach (Eds.), Second language production (pp. 26–49). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Pallotti, G.
(2007) An operational definition of the emergence criterion. Applied Linguistics, 28, 361–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perdue, C.
(1996) Pre-basic varieties: The first stages of second language acquisition. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, 2, 135–149.Google Scholar
Pérez-Vidal, C., & Juan-Garau, M.
(2011) The effect of context and input conditions on oral and written development: A study abroad perspective. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 49(2), 157–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1984) Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6(2), 186–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1989) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 1, 52–79.Google Scholar
(1998) Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S.
(2005) Extending Processability Theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp.199–252). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Håkansson, G.
(1999) A unified approach toward the development of Swedish as a L2: A processability account. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(3), 383–420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Regan, V.
(1995) The acquisition of sociolinguistic native speech norms: Effects of a year abroad on second language learners of French. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 245–268). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R., & Frota, S.
(1986) Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: a case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. F.
(2004) Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 173–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
(1985) The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sun, C.-F., & Givon, T.
(1985) On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin Chinese: A quantified text study and its implications. Language 61(2), 329–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E.
(2007) Sociolinguistic approaches to second language research 1997–2007. The Modern Language Journal, 91(5), 837–848. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B.
(1993) Grammar teaching for the acquisition-rich classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26, 435–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Input processing and grammar instruction. Chestnut Hill, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
[ p. 280 ]
Wen, X.
(2006) Acquisition sequence of three constructions: An analysis of the Interlanguage of learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association, 41(3), 89–113.Google Scholar
Ying, H.
(1995) What sort of input is needed for intake? International Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 175–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y.
(2001) Second language acquisition of Chinese grammatical morphemes: a processability perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
(2005) Processing and formal instruction in the L2 acquisition of five Chinese grammatical morphemes. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 155–179). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Testing the Topic Hypothesis: The L2 acquisition of Chinese syntax. In F. Mansouri (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
(2019) L2 acquisition of Chinese Object topicalization structures: Processability and information structure. In A. Lenzing, H. Nicholas, & J. Roos (Eds.), Widening contexts for Processability Theory: Theories and issues (pp. 145–172). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Liu, B.
(2016) The ‘tense’ issue: Variable past tense marking by advanced end-state Chinese speakers of L2 English. In J.-U. Kessler, A. Lenzing, & X. Liebner (Eds.), Developing, modelling and assessing second languages (pp. 101–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar