References

References

Amendt, G.
(1995) Du oder Sie: 1945-1968-1995. Bremen: Ikaru-Verlag.Google Scholar
Barron, A.
(2003) Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Learning to say ‘you’ in German: the acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in a study abroad context. In M. A. DuFon, & E. Churchill (Eds.), Language learners in study abroad contexts (Vol. 15, pp. 59–88). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bayer, K.
(1979) Die Anredepronomina DU und SIE. Thesen zu einem semantischen Konflikt im Hochschulbereich. Deutsche Sprache, 7(3), 212–219.Google Scholar
Belz, J. A., & Kinginger, C.
(2003) Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German: The case of address forms. Language Learning, 53(4), 591–647. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Besch, W.
(1998) Duzen, Siezen, Titulieren: Zur Anrede im Deutschen heute und gestern. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Blood, R. & Ludewig, A.
(2016) Interkulturelles Lernen während eines kurzzeitigen, studienbegleitenden Fremdsprachenprogramms. Erfahrungen australischer Studierender in Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 21(1), 227–244.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C.
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. G.
(1995) The German language in a changing Europe: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clyne, M., Norrby, C., & Warren, J.
(2009) Language and human relations: Styles of address in contemporary language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delisle, H. H.
(1986) Intimacy, solidarity and distance: The pronouns of address in German. Die Unterrichtspraxis / Teaching German, 19(1), 4–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Donato, R. & Clyde, M. D.
(2016) Deutsch: Na Klar (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Duff, P. A.
(2007) Second language socialization as sociocultural theory: Insights and issues. Language Teaching, 40(4), 309–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 141 ]
DuFon, M. A.
(1999) The acquisition of linguistic politeness in Indonesian as a second language by sojourners in naturalistic interactions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations and Theses (9951181)Google Scholar
Grbich, C.
(2012) Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Grieve, A.
(2010) “Aber ganz ehrlich:” Differences in episodic structure, apologies and truth-orientation in German and Australian workplace telephone discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(1), 190–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, E. T. & Hall, M. R.
(1983) Hidden differences, studies in international communication: How to communicate with the Germans. Hamburg: Grüner & Jahr.Google Scholar
Hassall, T.
(2013) Pragmatic development during short-term study abroad: The case of address terms in Indonesian. Journal of Pragmatics, 55, 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Individual variation in L2 study-abroad outcomes: A case study from Indonesian pragmatics. Multilingua, 34(1), 33–59.Google Scholar
Henery, A.
(2014) Interpreting ‘real French’: The role of expert mediation in learners’ observations, understandings, and use of pragmatic practices while abroad (Unpublished doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from http://​repository​.cmu​.edu​/dissertations​/442/
(2015) On the development of metapragmatic awareness abroad: two case studies exploring the role of expert-mediation. Language Awareness, 24(4), 316–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, R.
(2003) The German address system: binary and scalar at once. In I. Taavitsainen & A. H. Jucker (Eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems (pp. 401–425). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G.
(1984) Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
House, J.
(1996) Contrastive discourse analysis and misunderstanding: The case of German and English. In E. Ammon (Ed.), Contrastive sociolinguistics (pp. 345–362). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Communicative styles in English and German. European Journal of English Studies, 10(3), 249–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iino, M.
1996‘Excellent foreigner!’: Gaijinization of Japanese language and culture in contact situations: An ethnographic study of dinner table conversations between Japanese host families and American students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://​repository​.upenn​.edu​/dissertations​/AAI9627938/
Kallmeyer, W.
(2003) “Sagen Sie bitte zu mir:” Werner Kallmeyer, Soziolinguist am Institut für Deutsche Sprache in Mannheim über die Kunst der richtigen Anrede. Das Gespräch führte C. Schmitt. http://​www​.zeit​.de​/2003​/27​/Alltag​_2fDuzen​_27Google Scholar
Kasper, G.
(2001) Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development. Applied Linguistics, 22(4), 502–530. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kinginger, C.
(2008) Language learning in study abroad: Case studies of Americans in France. The Modern Language Journal, 92(s1), 1–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klapper, J., & Rees, J.
(2012) University residence abroad for foreign language students: Analysing the linguistic benefits. The Language Learning Journal, 40(3), 335–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kretzenbacher, H. L.
(1991) Vom Sie zum Du-und retour. In H. L. Kretzenbacher (Ed.), Vom Sie zum Du-mehr als eine neue Konvention (pp. 9–77). Hamburg: Luchterhand Literaturverlag.Google Scholar
[ p. 142 ]
Kretzenbacher, H. L., Clyne, M. & Schüpbach, D.
(2006) Pronominal address in German: Rules, anarchy and embarassment potential. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 29(2), 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E.
(1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marriott, H.
(1995) The acquisition of politeness patterns by exchange students in Japan. In: B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context, (pp. 197–224) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nerlich, S.
(2015) Students from Australian universities studying abroad: a demographic profile. Australian Universities’ Review, 57(1), 52–59.Google Scholar
Ochs, E.
(1990) Indexicality and socialization. In G. H. S. Herdt, A. Richard & J. W. Stigler (Ed.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 287–308). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In J. Gumperz, & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 407–438). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schauer, G.
(2009) Interlanguage pragmatic development: The study abroad context. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Shardakova, M.
(2005) Intercultural pragmatics in the speech of American L2 learners of Russian: Apologies offered by Americans in Russian. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(4), 423–451. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siegal, M. S.
(1994) Looking east: learning Japanese as a second language in Japan and the interaction of race, gender and social context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (9529497)Google Scholar
Shively, R. L.
(2008) Politeness and social interaction in study abroad: Service encounters in L2 Spanish (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (3311436)Google Scholar
(2011) L2 pragmatic development in study abroad: A longitudinal study of Spanish service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(6), 1818–1835. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stief, C., & Stang, C.
(2002) German grammar in a nutshell. Munich: LangenscheidtGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N.
(2011) The effect of L2 proficiency and study-abroad experience on pragmatic comprehension. Language Learning, 61(3), 904–939. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Contexts and pragmatics learning: Problems and opportunities of the study abroad research. Language Teaching, 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A.
(2003) Psychologie interkulturellen Handelns. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Turnbull, W.
(2001) An appraisal of pragmatic elicitation techniques for the social psychological study of talk: the case of request refusals. Pragmatics, 11(1), 31–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C.
(2010) Toward a second language socialization perspective: Issues in study abroad research. Foreign Language Annals, 43(1), 50–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watson-Gegeo, K. A.
(2004) Mind, language, and epistemology: Toward a language socialization paradigm for SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 88(3), 331–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 143 ]
Yuan, Y.
(2001) An inquiry into empirical pragmatics data-gathering methods: Written DCTs, oral DCTs, field notes, and natural conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(2), 271–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Strobl, Carola & Kristof Baten
2021. Writing development during study abroad. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 6:1  pp. 124 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.