Cover not available
Article published In:
Study abroad and the Erasmus+ programme in Europe: Perspectives on language and intercultural learning
Edited by Anne Marie Devlin
[Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 5:1] 2020
► pp. 69–88

Supporting Erasmus students through integrating reflective practices in the curriculum

The CONNECT project

| University of Limerick
| University of Limerick

There is considerable evidence that suitable preparation for the Erasmus experience can make a significant difference to students. Often, however, institutions have to battle to provide in-depth pre-departure training, and re-entry events or training are too seldom available. Following Erasmus there is rarely space in the curriculum of the home university for reflection, assessment and the integration of the experiences and multi-faceted learning that took place abroad. This article argues that the challenge is therefore to integrate meaningful reflections and assessment into more traditional modules, such as literature-based ones. Accordingly, this article presents some options of how to integrate re-entry reflections in the form of a module on travel literature as well as a voluntary re-entry module that can be offered to returning students irrespective of their course of study. Components of the Erasmus+ CONNECT training programme serve as an example of training material.

Keywords: reflective learning, social and personal development, intercultural learning, digital learning
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Reflective learning: History and definitions
    • 2.2Aims and benefits of reflective learning
    • 2.3Models and stages of reflection
    • 2.4Methods of reflective learning
    • 2.5Reflective learning and study abroad
  • 3.Options for supporting Erasmus students and promoting reflective practice
    • 3.1CONNECT: An intercultural learning network
    • 3.2Integrating reflective practice into an existing module
      • 3.2.1Student feedback
  • 4.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 24 February 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sar.18006.hof
References
Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D.
(2015) Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages, 1(1), 9–16.Google Scholar
Bain, J. D., Ballantyne, R., Mills, C., & Lester, N. C.
(2002) Reflecting on practice: Student teachers’ perspectives. Flaxton, QLD: Post Pressed.Google Scholar
Beaven, A., & Borghetti, C.
(2018) Exploring intercultural learning and second language identities in the ERASMUS context. In J. L. Plews & K. Misfeldt (Eds.), Second language study abroad: Programming, pedagogy, and participant engagement (pp. 195–222). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Black, P. E., & Plowright, D.
(2010) A multi-dimensional model of reflective learning for professional development. Reflective Practice, 11(2), 245–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boud, D.
(2001) Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 901(Summer), 9–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brockbank, A., & McGill, I.
(2007) Facilitating reflective learning in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Brubaker, C.
(2017) Re-thinking re-entry: new approaches to supporting students after study abroad. Die Unterrichtspraxis. A Journal of the American Association of Teachers of German, 50(2), 109–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byram, M.
(2009) Evaluation and/or assessment of intercultural competence. In A. Hu & M. Byram (Eds.), Interkulturelle Kompetenz und fremdsprachliches Lernen – Modelle, Empirie, Evaluation (pp. 215–226). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Byram, M., & Dervin, F.
(Eds.) (2008) Student, staff and academic mobility in higher education. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Carrington, S., & Selva, G.
(2010) Critical social theory and transformative learning: Evidence in pre-service teachers’ service-learning reflection logs. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(1), 45–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Civico, M.
(2015) Ways to overcome reverse culture shock. Retrieved from [URL]> (12 March 12 2018).
Cole, M., & Wertsch, J.
(1996) Beyond the individual-social antinomy in discussions of Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development, 39(5), 250–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CONNECT
(2018) Intercultural learning network 4 Europe: Scientific evaluation of face to face curriculum, online curriculum and experience map (Final report). Retrieved from [URL]> (8 March 2019).
CONNECT Intercultural Learning Network
. (n.d.). Retrieved from the CONNECT website [URL]> (6 March 2019).
Council of Europe
(2018a) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Retrieved from [URL]> (15 July 2019).
(2018b) European Language Portfolio (ELP). Retrieved from [URL]> (15 July 2019).
Dewey, J.
(1916) Democracy and education. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
European Union
. (n.d.). Erasmus+ Mobile App. Retrieved from [URL]> (6 March 2019).
Feng, J.
(2016) Improving intercultural competence in the classroom: A reflective development model. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 27(1), 4–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Peña, R., Fuentes-Pumarola, C., Malagón-Aguilera, M., Bonmatí-Tomàs, A., Bosch-Farré, C., & Ballester-Ferrando, D.
(2016) The evaluation of reflective learning from the nursing student’s point of view: A mixed method approach. Nurse Education Today, 441, 59–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fullana, J., Pallisera, M., Colomer, J., Fernández Peña, R., & Pérez Burriel, M.
(2016) Reflective learning in higher education: A qualitative study on students’ perceptions. Studies in Higher Education, 41(6), 1008–1022. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granott, N.
(1993) Patterns of interaction in the co-construction of knowledge: Separate minds, joint effort, and weird creatures. In R. H. Wozniak & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 183–207). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gullahorn, J. E., & Gullahorn, J. T.
(1963) An extension of the U-curve hypothesis. Journal of Social Issues, 191, 33–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hampel, R., & Stickler, U.
(Eds.) (2015) Developing online language teaching research-based pedagogies and reflective practices. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R.
(2000) An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development 48(3), 23–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holfter, G., & Rieder, M.
(2018a) “Things I would have liked to know before” – How to Enhance the Erasmus Experience. GFL – German as a Foreign Language, 11, 68–81.Google Scholar
(2018b) CONNECT Re-entry Module 1, slide 19. Retrieved from [URL]> (27 June 2018).
Holmes, P., Bavieri, L., Ganassin, S., & Murphy, J.
(2016) Interculturality and the study abroad experience: students’ learning from the IEREST materials. Language and Intercultural Communication, 16(3), 452–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
IEREST
(2015) Intercultural education resources for Erasmus students and their teachers. Koper: Annales University Press. Retrieved from [URL]> (6 March 2018).
InterCultur
(2017) Mentors training. Retrieved from [URL]> (27 June 2019).
Jackson, J.
(2006) Ethnographic preparation for short-term study and residence in the target culture. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(1), 77–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolb, D. A.
(1984) Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A.
(2005) Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koong, C., Yang, T., Wu, C., Li, H., & Tseng, C.
(2014) An investigation into effectiveness of different reflective learning strategies for learning operational software. Computers & Education, 72(C), 167–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzaklewska, E., & Skórska, P.
(2013) Culture shock during ERASMUS exchange – Determinants, processes, prevention. In B. Feyen & E. Krzaklewska (Eds.), The ERASMUS phenomenon – Symbol of a new European generation? (pp. 105–126). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lewin, K.
(1951) Field theory in social science. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar
Little, D.
(2005) The Common European Framework and the European Language Portfolio: involving learners and their judgements in the assessment process. Language Testing, 22(3), 321–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lysgaard, S.
(1955) Adjustment in a foreign society: Norwegian Fulbright grantees visiting the United States. International Social Science Bulletin, 71, 45–51.Google Scholar
Moon, J. A.
(1999) Reflection in learning and professional development. London: Cogan Page.Google Scholar
(2004) A handbook of reflective and experiential learning. Theory and practice. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
Oberg, K.
(1960) Culture shock: Adjustment to new cultural environments. Practical Anthropology, 71, 177–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawar, M.
(2017) Reflective learning and teaching in social work field education in international contexts. British Journal of Social Work, 47(1), 198–218.Google Scholar
Pérez-Encinas, A., Rodriguez-Pomeda, J., & Josek, M.
(2017) Problematic areas of host university support services for short-term mobility students. Journal of International Students, 7(4), 1030–1047.Google Scholar
Pérez Burriel, M., Pallisera, M., Fullana, J., Fernández, R., & Colomer, J.
(2013) Reflective learning in higher education: A mixed quantitative-qualitative analysis of students’ appraisals. Proceedings of the 6th international conference of education, research and innovation (pp. 384–391). Seville: IATED.Google Scholar
Pusch, M. D.
(Ed.) (1979) Multicultural education: A cross cultural training approach. Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
Rodgers, C.
(2002) Seeing student learning: Teacher change and the role of reflection. Voices inside schools. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 230–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M.
(2013) The pedagogical balancing act: Teaching reflection in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(2): 144–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M., & Ryan, M.
(2013) Theorising a model for teaching and assessing reflective learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(2): 244–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Savicki, V.
(2008) Developing intercultural competence and transformation: Theory, research, and application in international education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.Google Scholar
Schön, D.
(1983) The reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Terry, E.
(2017) Battling the post-Erasmus blues: Culture shock, again? Retrieved from [URL]> (12 March 2018).
Turner, S., & Beddoes, L.
(2007) Using reflective models to enhance learning: Experiences of staff and students. Nurse Education in Practice, 7(3): 135–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VuHuong, J.
(2016) How to deal with reverse culture-shock after returning from abroad. Retrieved from [URL]> (12 March 2018).
Weidemann, A., Straub, J., & Nothnagel, S.
(Eds.) (2010) Wie lehrt man interkulturelle. Kompetenz? Theorien, Methoden und Praxis in der Hochschulausbildung. Ein Handbuch. Bielefeld: Transcript. DOI logoGoogle Scholar