English Discourse Particles
Evidence from a corpus
| Göteborg University
There are few aspects of language which are more problematic than its discourse particles. The present study of discourse particles draws upon data from the London-Lund Corpus to show how the methods and tools of corpora can sharpen their description. The first part of the book provides a picture of the state of the art in discourse particle studies and introduces the theory and methodology for the analysis in the second part of the book. Discourse particles are analysed as elements which have been grammaticalised and as a result have certain properties and uses. The importance of linguistic and contextual cues such as text type, position in the discourse, prosody and collocation for analysing discourse particles is illustrated.
The following chapters deal with specific discourse particles (now, oh, just, sort of, and that sort of thing, actually) on the basis of their empirical analysis in the London-Lund Corpus. Examples and extended extracts from many different text types are provided to illustrate what discourse particles are doing in discourse.
The following chapters deal with specific discourse particles (now, oh, just, sort of, and that sort of thing, actually) on the basis of their empirical analysis in the London-Lund Corpus. Examples and extended extracts from many different text types are provided to illustrate what discourse particles are doing in discourse.
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 10] 2002. xvi, 299 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Key to prosodic transcription
|
xiii
|
|
Acknowledgements
|
xv
|
|
1. Introduction
|
1–56
|
|
2. The topic-changer now
|
57–95
|
|
3. The interjections oh and ah
|
97–151
|
|
4. The interpersonal particle just
|
153–174
|
|
5. The ‘adjuster’ sort of
|
175–209
|
|
6. Particles with vague reference: ‘and that sort of thing’
|
211–249
|
|
7. The expectation marker actually
|
251–275
|
|
8. Conclusion
|
277–279
|
|
References
|
281–290
|
|
Name index
|
291–299
|
|
Subject index
|
295–298
|
“Overall I found "English Discourse Particles" to be very manageable, accessible and pleasant to read. Aijmer's book "English Discourse Particles" gives a very thorough and fine-grained description of the functions of some frequent English DPs. This book is a very rich source of information about the studies that have been undertaken in English (as well as in other languages, such as Italian, French, German and Swedish). This book will therefore be useful to a large group of people, primarily those interested in discourse analysis in general and in DPs in particular. Because this book is very important for the insights it provides about the principles and the mechanisms or routines that are in place when we talk, this volume will certainly also be of much interest to those dealing with more practical applications of linguistic studies: language teachers and lexicographers.”
Anna-Maria De Cesare on Linguist List 14.87, 2003
“This monograph represents a very valuable addition to our knowledge of the formal and pragmatic properties of a number of specific English DPs, and several of the questions it raises will almost certainly be a source of inspiration of future scholarship.”
Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen in Acta Linguistica Vol.36, 2004
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2014. Discourse linguistics: Theory and practice.
Functions of Language 21:1 ► pp. 1 ff. 
No author info given
2015.
In Investigating Intimate Discourse,
► pp. 123 ff.
No author info given
2015. The computer-mediated expression of surprise: A corpus analysis of chats by English and Italian native speakers and Italian learners of English.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:2 ► pp. 383 ff.
No author info given
2016.
In Discourse Reflexivity in Linear Unit Grammar [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 76],
No author info given
2016.
In Requests in American and British English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 265],
No author info given
2017.
In Discourse-Pragmatic Variation in Context [Studies in Language Companion Series, 187],
No author info given
2018.
In Compliments and Positive Assessments [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 289],
No author info given
2018.
In Discourse Readjustment(s) in Contemporary English,
► pp. 335 ff.
No author info given
2018.
In How to Do Corpus Pragmatics on Pragmatically Annotated Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 84],
Abuarrah, Sufyan
2016. ‘Now’: a marker to a different mental representation and proximization of threat.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 48:2 ► pp. 195 ff.
Adamczyk, Magdalena
2015. Do hedges always hedge?.
Pragmatics 25:3 ► pp. 321 ff.
Adamczyk, Magdalena
2017.
In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 186],
► pp. 369 ff.
Aijmer, Karin
2015.
In Researching Sociopragmatic Variability,
► pp. 201 ff.
Aijmer, Karin & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
2004. A model and a methodology for the study of pragmatic markers: the semantic field of expectation.
Journal of Pragmatics 36:10 ► pp. 1781 ff.
Aijmer, Karin & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
2009.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Alazzawie, Abdulkhaliq
2015. ؟adi as a Discourse Marker in Spoken Iraqi Arabic.
Theory and Practice in Language Studies 5:7 ► pp. 1352 ff.
Ali, Eman Awni
2015. The Use of Interpersonal Discourse Markers by Students of English at the University of Jordan.
SSRN Electronic Journal
Amador-Moreno, Carolina P., Kevin McCafferty & Elaine Vaughan
2015.
In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 258],
► pp. 1 ff.
Ameka, Felix K. & David P. Wilkins
2006.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Andersen, Gisle
2016. Semi-lexical features in corpus transcription.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:3 ► pp. 323 ff.
Asuman, ASIK
2015. Discourse markers in EFL setting: Perceptions of Turkish EFL teachers.
Educational Research and Reviews 10:7 ► pp. 941 ff.
Babanoğlu, M. Pınar
2014. A Corpus-based Study on the Use of Pragmatic Markers as Speech-like Features in Turkish EFL Learners’ Argumentative Essays.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 136 ► pp. 186 ff.
Bardzokas, Valandis
2017. Conceptual and Procedural Aspects of Causal Meaning: Corpus-Analytic Evidence from Modern Greek.
Corpus Pragmatics 1:3 ► pp. 257 ff.
Beeching, Kate
2015.
In Researching Sociopragmatic Variability,
► pp. 174 ff.
Beeching, Kate
2017.
In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 186],
► pp. 459 ff.
Beeching, Kate
2018.
In Positioning the Self and Others [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 292],
► pp. 127 ff.
Beeching, Kate & Helen Woodfield
2015.
In Researching Sociopragmatic Variability,
► pp. 1 ff.
Bladas, Òscar & Neus Nogué
2016. “Que bé, tu! (« that’s great, you! »)”.
Pragmatics 26:3 ► pp. 473 ff.
Bogdanova-Beglarian, Natalia, Tatiana Sherstinova, Olga Blinova, Gregory Martynenko & Ekaterina Baeva
2018.
In Speech and Computer [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11096],
► pp. 42 ff.
Bohnacker, Ute
2013. Null Subjects in Swabian.
Studia Linguistica 67:3 ► pp. 257 ff.
Bolden, Galina B.
2008. Reopening Russian Conversations: The Discourse Particle -to and the Negotiation of Interpersonal Accountability in Closings.
Human Communication Research 34:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
Bondi, Marina
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Breban, Tine & Sylvie Hancil
2018.
In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],
► pp. 1 ff.
BREMS, LIESELOTTE
2010. Size noun constructions as collocationally constrained constructions: lexical and grammaticalized uses.
English Language and Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
Brems, Lieselotte & Kristin Davidse
2010. The Grammaticalisation of Nominal Type Noun Constructions withkind/sort of: Chronology and Paths of Change.
English Studies 91:2 ► pp. 180 ff.
Burke, Isabelle
2017. Wicked Which: The Linking Relative in Australian English.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 37:3 ► pp. 356 ff.
Buysse, Lieven
2011. The Business of Pragmatics. The Case of Discourse Markers in The Speech of Students of Business English and English Linguistics.
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 161 ► pp. 10 ff.
Buysse, Lieven
2014.
In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 2],
► pp. 213 ff.
Calude, Andreea S. & Gerald P. Delahunty
2011. Inferentials in spoken English.
Pragmatics 21:3 ► pp. 307 ff.
Campillos Llanos, Leonardo & Paula González Gómez
2014.
In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 2],
► pp. 239 ff.
Chauveau-Thoumelin, Pierre, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016. De l’exemplification à la catégorisation approximative : étude de la construction [[X]SNgenre[Y]SN].
SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 12005 ff.
Cheshire, Jenny
2007. Discourse variation, grammaticalisation and stuff like that.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 11:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
CHESHIRE, JENNY & MARIA SECOVA
2018. The origins of new quotative expressions: the case of Paris French.
Journal of French Language Studies 28:2 ► pp. 209 ff.
Chor, Winnie, Foong Ha Yap & Tak-Sum Wong
2016. Chinese interrogative particles as talk coordinators at the right periphery.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 178 ff.
Claridge, Claudia
2018. Now in the historical courtroom.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19:2 ► pp. 223 ff.
Dahak, Anissa
2014. If you like et if you will : des marqueurs de discours ?.
Anglophonia :18
Davis, Boyd H.
2005.
In Alzheimer Talk, Text and Context,
► pp. 128 ff.
De Felice, Rachele
2013.
In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2013 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 1],
► pp. 153 ff.
De Felice, Rachele & Gregory Garretson
2018. Politeness at Work in the Clinton Email Corpus: A First Look at the Effects of Status and Gender.
Corpus Pragmatics 2:3 ► pp. 221 ff.
Defour, Tine & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
2010. “Positive Appraisal” as a Core Meaning ofwell: A Corpus-Based Analysis in Middle and Early Modern English Data.
English Studies 91:6 ► pp. 643 ff.
Denis, Derek
2017. The Development of And Stuff in Canadian English: A Longitudinal Study of Apparent Grammaticalization.
Journal of English Linguistics 45:2 ► pp. 157 ff.
Deshors, Sandra C., Sandra Götz & Samantha Laporte
2016. Linguistic innovations in EFL and ESL.
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2 ► pp. 131 ff.
Diaz, Maria Angela, Ken Lau & Chia-Yen Lin
2019. Pragmatic functions of I think in computer-mediated, cross-cultural communication between Taiwanese
and Japanese undergraduate students.
Pragmatics
Dobrovoljc, Kaja
2017. Multi-word discourse markers and their corpus-driven identification.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:4 ► pp. 551 ff.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga, Renata Jančaříková, Gabriela Miššíková & Renata Povolná
2017.
In Coherence and Cohesion in English Discourse,
Downing, Angela & Elena Martínez Caro
2019.
In Emotion in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 302],
► pp. 87 ff.
Dushku, Silvana
2010. Investigating engagement response tokens in spoken narrative discourse.
Classroom Discourse 1:2 ► pp. 142 ff.
Dér, Csilla
2010. On the status of discourse markers.
Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Dér, Csilla Ilona & Alexandra Markó
2010. A Pilot Study of Hungarian Discourse Markers.
Language and Speech 53:2 ► pp. 135 ff.
Evison, Jane
2013. Turn openings in academic talk: where goals and roles intersect.
Classroom Discourse 4:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Farouq, Sahar
2019. Investigating discourse markers in the annexes of the International Civil Aviation Organization.
Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 37:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
Fernández, Julieta
2015. General extender use in spoken Peninsular Spanish: metapragmatic awareness and pedagogical implications.
Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 2:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Flöck, Ilka & Ronald Geluykens
2015.
In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 3],
► pp. 7 ff.
Furkó, Péter B.
2019.
In Fuzzy Boundaries in Discourse Studies,
► pp. 215 ff.
Furkó, Péter B.
2020.
In Discourse Markers and Beyond,
► pp. 1 ff.
Furkó, Péter B.
2020.
In Discourse Markers and Beyond,
► pp. 219 ff.
Gablasova, Dana & Vaclav Brezina
2015.
In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 3],
► pp. 117 ff.
Goria, Eugenio
2016.
In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178],
► pp. 273 ff.
Gournay, Lucie
2011. Connecteurs et altérités dans une perspective contrastive français-anglais.
Revue française de linguistique appliquée XVI:2 ► pp. 75 ff.
Goutsos, Dionysis
2017.
In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 186],
► pp. 125 ff.
Grant, Lynn
2013. The Frequency and Function of Just in British and New Zealand Engineering Lectures.
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 56:2 ► pp. 176 ff.
GRAY, MARK
2012. On the interchangeability of actually and really in spoken English: quantitative and qualitative evidence from corpora.
English Language and Linguistics 16:1 ► pp. 151 ff.
GRUND, PETER J. & ERIK SMITTERBERG
2014. Conjuncts in nineteenth-century English: diachronic development and genre diversity.
English Language and Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 157 ff.
Guangjun, Wu
2017. A relevance-theoretic account of the use of the discourse markerwellin translation from Chinese into English.
Translation and Interpreting Studies 12:1 ► pp. 162 ff.
Gómez González, María de los Ángeles, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco Gonzálvez García & Angela Downing
2014.
In The Functional Perspective on Language and Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 247],
► pp. 1 ff.
Götz, Sandra
2015.
In Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 70],
► pp. 191 ff.
Heidar, Davood Mashhadi & Reza Biria
2011. Sociopragmatic Functions of Discourse Markers in International Law Texts.
Theory and Practice in Language Studies 1:11
Heine, Bernd
2018.
In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],
► pp. 23 ff.
Hendrikse, AP, N Nomdebevana & Jens Allwood
2016. An exploration of the nature, functions and subcategories of the discourse functional category, Interactive, in spoken Xhosa.
South African Journal of African Languages 36:1 ► pp. 93 ff.
HENNECKE, INGA
2017. The impact of pragmatic markers and hedging on sentence comprehension: a case study of comme and genre.
Journal of French Language Studies 27:3 ► pp. 355 ff.
Hernández, Todd A
2011. Re-examining the role of explicit instruction and input flood on the acquisition of Spanish discourse markers.
Language Teaching Research 15:2 ► pp. 159 ff.
Hilmisdóttir, Helga
2010. The present moment as an interactional resource: The case of nú and núna in Icelandic conversation.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics 33:3 ► pp. 269 ff.
Hofmockel, Carolin
2017. Patterns of (inter)subjectivity.
Functions of Language 24:2 ► pp. 166 ff.
Howe, Stephen
2017. Aye–ay: An Anglo-Frisian Parallel.
Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 77:1-2 ► pp. 210 ff.
Hsieh, Chen-Yu Chester
2019. Linguistic typology, language modality, and stuff like that.
Studies in Language 43:1 ► pp. 92 ff.
Huang, Lan-fen
2014. “I Think” in NS and Chinese NNS Spoken English.
International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 4:1 ► pp. 84 ff.
Hunt, Daniel & Kevin Harvey
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
INNES, BRONWEN
2010. “Well, that’s why I asked the question sir”: Well as a discourse marker in court.
Language in Society 39:1 ► pp. 95 ff.
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2018.
In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],
► pp. 381 ff.
Janssens, Karolien & Jan Nuyts
2014.
In The Functional Perspective on Language and Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 247],
► pp. 149 ff.
Jasionytė-Mikučionienė, Erika
2019. Subordinating Conjunctions as Discourse Markers in Lithuanian.
Corpus Pragmatics 3:4 ► pp. 285 ff.
Jucker, Andreas H.
2013.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Jucker, Andreas H. & Larssyn Staley
2017.
In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness,
► pp. 403 ff.
Kallen, Jeffrey L.
2015.
In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 258],
► pp. 135 ff.
Kim, Minju
2019. Korean general extenders tunci ha and kena ha ‘or something’.
Pragmatics
Kirk, John M.
2015.
In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 258],
► pp. 89 ff.
Kirk, John M.
2016. The Pragmatic Annotation Scheme of the SPICE-Ireland Corpus.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:3 ► pp. 299 ff.
Kloetzl, Svitlana
2013. English with the “married” name: The case of linguistic hybridity in ELF couple talk.
Discourse and Interaction 6:2 ► pp. 29 ff.
Kolyaseva, Alena & Kristin Davidse
2018. A typology of lexical and grammaticalized uses of Russian tip, tipa, po tipu.
Russian Linguistics 42:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Koops, Christian & Arne Lohmann
2015. A quantitative approach to the grammaticalization of discourse markers: Evidence from their sequencing behavior.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 232 ff.
Kot, Aneta
2015.
In Issues in Teaching, Learning and Testing Speaking in a Second Language [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],
► pp. 45 ff.
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019.
In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization,
Küngas, Annika
2014.
In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 243],
► pp. 107 ff.
Laas, Oliver
2018. Questioning the Virtual Friendship Debate: Fuzzy Analogical Arguments from Classification and Definition.
Argumentation 32:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
Lam, Phoenix W. Y.
2010. Discourse Particles in Corpus Data and Textbooks: The Case of Well.
Applied Linguistics 31:2 ► pp. 260 ff.
Levey, Stephen
2012. General Extenders and Grammaticalization: Insights from London Preadolescents.
Applied Linguistics 33:3 ► pp. 257 ff.
Levin, Magnus & Hans Lindquist
2015.
In Current Issues in Phraseology [Benjamins Current Topics, 74],
► pp. 7 ff.
Lewis, Diana M.
2018.
In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],
► pp. 135 ff.
Lin, Chia-Yen
2015. An exploratory comparison of the use of modifiers by native speakers of English and Mandarin Chinese in academic lectures.
Text & Talk 35:1
Liu, Binmei
2017. The use of discourse markersbutandsoby native English speakers and Chinese speakers of English.
Pragmatics 27:4 ► pp. 479 ff.
Lohmann, Arne & Christian Koops
2016.
In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178],
► pp. 417 ff.
Louviot, Elise
2018.
In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],
► pp. 259 ff.
Lyu, Siqi & Yi-na Wang
2015. Karin Aijmer &Bengt Altenberg (eds.), Advances in corpus-based contrastive linguistics (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2013. Pp. x + 295..
Journal of Linguistics 51:3 ► pp. 677 ff.
MacArthur, Fiona, Tina Krennmayr & Jeannette Littlemore
2015. How Basic Is“UNDERSTANDING IS SEEING” When Reasoning About Knowledge? Asymmetric Uses of Sight Metaphors in Office Hours Consultations in English as Academic Lingua Franca.
Metaphor and Symbol 30:3 ► pp. 184 ff.
Marcus, Nicole E.
2009. Continuous Semantic Development of the Discourse MarkerWell.
English Studies 90:2 ► pp. 214 ff.
Maschler, Yael & Deborah Schiffrin
2015.
In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,
► pp. 189 ff.
Matamala, Anna
2009. Interjections in Original and Dubbed Sitcoms in Catalan: A Comparison.
Meta 54:3 ► pp. 485 ff.
Matoesian, Gregory
2005. Struck by speech revisited: Embodied stance in jurisdictional discourse1.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 9:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
Matoesian, Gregory
2013. Language and material conduct in legal discourse.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 17:5 ► pp. 634 ff.
Matoesian, Gregory & Kristin Gilbert
2016. Multifunctionality of hand gestures and material conduct during closing argument.
Gesture 15:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Matoesian, Gregory & Kristin Enola Gilbert
2018.
In Multimodal Conduct in the Law,
Mauranen, Anna
2006.
In Spoken English, Tesol and Applied Linguistics,
► pp. 143 ff.
McCafferty, Kevin & Carolina P. Amador-Moreno
2019.
In Processes of Change [Studies in Language Variation, 21],
► pp. 73 ff.
McCarthy, Michael
2015.
In Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 66],
► pp. ix ff.
Migge, Bettina
2015.
In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 258],
► pp. 390 ff.
Migge, Bettina
2020. Broadening creole studies.
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 35:1 ► pp. 160 ff.
Mihatsch, Wiltrud
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Millar, Sharon
2015.
In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 258],
► pp. 292 ff.
Mirzaei Jegarlooei, Seyyed Hooshmand, Hamid Allami & Gustavo Cunha Araújo
2018. (Im)politeness strategies and use of discourse markers.
Cogent Arts & Humanities 5:1
Mossberg, Mari
2009. Étude contrastive français-suédois des subordonnants conditionnels concessifsmême sietäven om.
Studia Neophilologica 81:2 ► pp. 183 ff.
Mulder, Jean, Cara Penry Williams & Erin Moore
2019. Sort of in Australian English.
Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 29:1 ► pp. 9 ff.
Mullan, Kerry
2016. Et pis bon, ben alors voilà quoi!Teaching those pesky discourse markers.
International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning 11:3 ► pp. 271 ff.
Murphy, Bróna
2015.
In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 258],
► pp. 65 ff.
Nakahama, Yuko
2018.
In Language Learning, Discourse and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 64],
► pp. 249 ff.
NAKANO, HIROZO
2006. Why and How Do Languages Change? (R. Hickery (ed.), Motives for Language Change).
ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 23:1 ► pp. 137 ff.
Naya, Belén Méndez
2007. Adjunct, modifier, discourse marker: On the various functions ofrightin the history of English.
Folia Linguistica 27:1-2 ► pp. 141 ff.
Nejadansari, Dariush & Ali Mohamad Mohammadi
2014. The frequencies and functions of discourse markers in the Iranian university EFL classroom discourse.
International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 4:2
O'Keeffe, Anne
2011. Teaching and Irish English.
English Today 27:2 ► pp. 58 ff.
Oladipupo, Rotimi O. & Foluke O. Unuabonah
2020.
Extended discourse‐pragmatic usage of
now
in Nigerian English
.
World Englishes
Overstreet, Maryann
2014. The role of pragmatic function in the grammaticalization of English general extenders.
Pragmatics 24:1 ► pp. 105 ff.
Palma-Fahey, María
2015.
In Pragmatic Markers in Irish English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 258],
► pp. 348 ff.
Pandarova, Irina
2017. Amador-Moreno, C.P., McCafferty, K., and Vaughan, E. (eds): Pragmatic Markers in Irish English. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series.
Corpus Pragmatics 1:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
Parvaresh, Vahid & Sayyed Amir Sheikhan
2019. Pragmatic functions of ‘sort of’ in Persian.
Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 29:1 ► pp. 86 ff.
Parvaresh, Vahid & Grace Zhang
2019. ‘Sort of’ across languages of the Asia and Oceania regions.
Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 29:1 ► pp. 2 ff.
Penry Williams, Cara
2019.
In Folklinguistics and Social Meaning in Australian English,
► pp. 27 ff.
Pichler, Heike
2010. Methods in discourse variation analysis: Reflections on the way forward1.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 14:5 ► pp. 581 ff.
PICHLER, HEIKE & STEPHEN LEVEY
2011. In search of grammaticalization in synchronic dialect data: general extenders in northeast England.
English Language and Linguistics 15:3 ► pp. 441 ff.
Pietrandrea, Paola, Sylvain Kahane, Anne Lacheret-Dujour & Frédéric Sabio
2014.
In Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 61],
► pp. 331 ff.
Purwanti, Indah Tri
2019. ‘Sort of’ in Indonesian television discourse.
Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 29:1 ► pp. 111 ff.
Pérez Blanco, María
2018. The discourse functions of certainly and its Spanish counterparts in journalistic opinion discourse.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 31:2 ► pp. 520 ff.
Quan, Lihong & Yanmei Zheng
2012. A Study of Self-repair Markers in Conversation by Chinese English Learners.
Journal of Language Teaching and Research 3:6
Rasenberg, Marlou, Joost Rommers & Geertje van Bergen
2020. Anticipating predictability: an ERP investigation of expectation-managing discourse markers in dialogue comprehension.
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 35:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Rawoens, Gudrun
2015.
In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series, 166],
► pp. 51 ff.
Raymond, Chase Wesley
2018.
In Between Turn and Sequence [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 31],
► pp. 59 ff.
Richet, Bertrand
2011. Des nombres à prendre ou à l’essai.
Anglophonia :15 (30) ► pp. 37 ff.
Romero-Trillo, Jesús
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Ruiz Yamuza, Emilia
2014. El adverbio νῦν como marcador discursivo.
Emerita 82:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Ruzaitė, Jūratė
2018. General extenders and discourse variation.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23:4 ► pp. 467 ff.
Rühlemann, Christoph
2018.
In Corpus Linguistics for Pragmatics,
► pp. 137 ff.
Rühlemann, Christoph
2020.
In Visual Linguistics with R,
Sabet, Peyman G. P.
2019. On the functions of sort of in New Zealand TV programs.
Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 29:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Sarfo-Kantankah, Kwabena Sarfo & Ben Kudus Yussif
2019. The use of actually in a non-native English parliamentary context: a corpus study.
<i>WORD</i> 65:4 ► pp. 234 ff.
SECOVA, MARIA
2014. ‘Je sais et tout mais . . .’ might the general extenders in European French be changing?.
Journal of French Language Studies 24:2 ► pp. 281 ff.
Staples, Shelley
2016.
In Talking at Work,
► pp. 179 ff.
Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2014.
In Language Use and Linguistic Structure,
► pp. 255 ff.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Derek Denis
2010. The Stuff of Change: General Extenders in Toronto, Canada.
Journal of English Linguistics 38:4 ► pp. 335 ff.
Tottie, Gunnel
2016.
In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178],
► pp. 97 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2016. On the rise of types of clause-final pragmatic markers in English.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
Tsai, Pei-Shu & Wo-Hsin Chu
2015. The Use of Discourse Markers among Mandarin Chinese Teachers, and Chinese as a Second Language and Chinese as a Foreign Language Learners.
Applied Linguistics ► pp. amv057 ff.
Tseronis, Assimakis
2011. Use and abuse of the strategic function ofin factandfranklywhen qualifying a standpoint.
Pragmatics 21:3 ► pp. 473 ff.
Ulyanova, Ulyana A. & Ludmila A. Petrochenko
2015. Discourse Elements in the Missing Manual.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 200 ► pp. 595 ff.
Unuabonah, Foluke O. & Rotimi O. Oladipupo
2020. Bilingual pragmatic markers in Nigerian English.
World Englishes
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka
2019. Frequency and Stylistic Variability of Discourse Markers in Nigerian English.
Corpus Pragmatics 3:3 ► pp. 249 ff.
Van Olmen, Daniël
2013. The Imperative of Say as a Pragmatic Marker in
English and Dutch.
Journal of Germanic Linguistics 25:3 ► pp. 247 ff.
Vaughan, Elaine & Brian Clancy
2016.
In Sociolinguistics in Ireland,
► pp. 365 ff.
Verdonik, Darinka
2015. Internal variety in the use of Slovene general extenders in different spoken discourse settings.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20:4 ► pp. 445 ff.
Verdonik, Darinka & Mirjam Sepesy Maučec
2016. A speech corpus as a source of lexical information.
International Journal of Lexicography ► pp. ecw004 ff.
Vine, Bernadette
2017.
In Studies in Corpus-Based Sociolinguistics,
► pp. 197 ff.
Válková, Silvie & Jarmila Tárnyiková
2015. Where focus formulas and discourse markers meet.
Discourse and Interaction 8:2 ► pp. 65 ff.
Vázquez Veiga, Nancy
2016.
In Spanish Learner Corpus Research [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 78],
► pp. 267 ff.
Wagner, David & Beth Herbel-Eisenmann
2008. “Just don’t”: The suppression and invitation of dialogue in the mathematics classroom.
Educational Studies in Mathematics 67:2 ► pp. 143 ff.
Wagner, Suzanne Evans, Ashley Hesson, Kali Bybel & Heidi Little
2015. Quantifying the referential function of general extenders in North American English.
Language in Society 44:5 ► pp. 705 ff.
Waltereit, Richard
2007. À propos de la genèse diachronique des combinaisons de marqueurs. L'exemple de bon ben et enfin bref.
Langue française 154:2 ► pp. 94 ff.
Wang, Yu-Fang, David Goodman, Shih-Yao Chen & Yi-Hsuan Hsiao
2011. Making claims and counterclaims through factuality: The uses of Mandarin Chinese qishi (‘actually’) and shishishang (‘in fact’) in institutional settings.
Discourse Studies 13:2 ► pp. 235 ff.
Wiltschko, Martina, Derek Denis & Alexandra D'Arcy
2018. Deconstructing variation in pragmatic function: A transdisciplinary case study.
Language in Society 47:4 ► pp. 569 ff.
Wolk, Christoph, Sandra Götz & Katja Jäschke
2020. Possibilities and Drawbacks of Using an Online Application for Semi-automatic Corpus Analysis to Investigate Discourse Markers and Alternative Fluency Variables.
Corpus Pragmatics
Wong, May
2017.
In Hong Kong English,
► pp. 155 ff.
Xu, Shasha
2016.
In Assessing Chinese Learners of English,
► pp. 85 ff.
Yang, Shanru
2014.
In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 2],
► pp. 291 ff.
Zhang, Grace
2019. The pragmatic use of ‘sort of’ in TV forums.
Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 29:1 ► pp. 62 ff.
Zhang, Grace & Vahid Parvaresh
2019.
In Elastic Language in Persuasion and Comforting,
► pp. 83 ff.
Zhang, Grace & Vahid Parvaresh
2019.
In Elastic Language in Persuasion and Comforting,
► pp. 231 ff.
Zheng, Qun
2015.
In Researching Sociopragmatic Variability,
► pp. 94 ff.
Çabuk, Sakine
2018. Discourse particles in Kurmanjî Kurdish-Turkish contact.
International Journal of Multilingualism ► pp. 1 ff.
ÇAKIR SARI, Hamide
2020. TÜRKÇE ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN SÖYLEM BELİRLEYİCİSİ KULLANIMI.
Dil Dergisi ► pp. 75 ff.
Čermáková, Anna, Zuzana Komrsková, Marie Kopřivová & Petra Poukarová
2017. Between Syntax and Pragmatics: The Causal Conjunction Protože in Spoken and Written Czech.
Corpus Pragmatics 1:4 ► pp. 393 ff.
Šliogerienė, Jolita, Giedrė Valūnaitė Oleškevičienė & Vilma Asijavičiūtė
2015. Discourse Relational Devices of Contrast in Lithuanian and English.
Coactivity: Philology, Educology 23:2 ► pp. 92 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Linguistics
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number: 2002028003