Cover not available
Part of
Time in Languages, Languages in Time
Edited by Anna Čermáková, Thomas Egan, Hilde Hasselgård and Sylvi Rørvik
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 101] 2021
► pp. 9–38

Slavery and Britain in the 19th century

 | Lancaster University
 | Lancaster University
 | Lancaster University
This study uses a corpus of just under two billion words from one historic British newspaper, the Liverpool Mercury, to explore shifting attitudes to slavery in Britain in the nineteenth century in the context of a port city that benefitted from the trade. In doing so, we explore three methodological issues – how to explore concepts in large corpora, how to do this over time and how to deal with poor quality data. Our approach to the study of concepts through time uses a new approach to looking at word usage change over time, Usage Fluctuation Analysis (McEnery, Brezina & Baker 2019). Our exploration of the issue of poor quality data is motivated by the variable quality of the OCR texts which constitute our nineteenth-century newspaper corpus data. Problems in data quality bedevil work on large-scale text collections of historic material. In this paper we will show that collocation, the core technique of UFA, can be used on such data if appropriate settings are chosen that minimise the problems arising from poor quality electronic text, permitting the exploration of corpus data at scale.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and data quality
  • 3.Scale
  • 4.Liverpool and the slave trade
  • 5.The Liverpool Mercury
  • 6.Analysis
    • 6.1The cessation of the slave trade
    • 6.2Discussion and location
    • 6.3Persistence of the slave trade
    • 6.4Condemnation, opposition and support of the slave trade
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 17 September 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.101.02mce
References (41)
References
Alex, Beatrix & Burns, John. 2014. Estimating and rating the quality of optically character recognised text. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage, Madrid, Spain, Apostolos Antonacopoulos & Klaus U. Schulz (eds), 97–102. New York NY: Association for Computing Machinery. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anon. 1884. Liverpool and the Slavery: An Historical Account of the Liverpool-African Slave Trade by a Genuine Dicky Sam. Liverpool: A. Bowker and Son. Google Scholar
Baggett, Florence. 2014. The Slaving Capital in the Era of Abolition: Liverpool’s Silent Rejection of the Slave Trade, 1787–1807. Master’s Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.
Baker, Paul. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum. Google Scholar
Baker, Paul & Egbert, Jessie. 2016. Triangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus Linguistic Research. New York NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balk, Hildelies & Conteh, Aly. 2011. IMPACT: Centre of competence in text digitisation. In HIP ’11: Proceedings of the 2011 Workshop on Historical Document Imaging and Processing, 155–160. Beijing, China. DOI logo
Baron, Alistair. 2011. Dealing with Spelling Variation in Early Modern English Texts. PhD dissertation, Lancaster University.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson. Google Scholar
Brooke, Richard. 1853. Liverpool as it was During the Last Quarter of the Eighteenth Century, 1775–1800. Liverpool: J. Mawdsley and Son. Google Scholar
Brookes, Gavin & McEnery, Tony. 2019. The utility of topic modelling for discourse studies: A critical evaluation. Discourse Studies 21(1): 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Desagulier, Guillaume. 2019. Can word vectors help corpus linguistics? Studia Neophilologica 91(2): 219–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drescher, Seymour. 1994. Whose abolition? Popular pressure and the ending of the British slave trade. Past and Present 143: 136–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Jessie & Baker, Paul. 2019. Using Corpus Methods to Triangulate Linguistic Analysis. New York NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evershed, John & Fitch, Kent. 2014. Correcting noisy OCR: context beats confusion. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the First International Conference on Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage, 45–51, Madrid, Spain. DOI logo
Flory, Céline. 2016. Between indenture and slavery? African indentured laborers in the French West Indies (1852–1862). Francophone Africa: Critical Perspectives, University of Portsmouth. <[URL]> (16 January 2020).
Hitchcock, Tim. 2013. Confronting the digital: Or how academic history writing lost the plot. Cultural and Social History 10(1): 9–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holley, Rose. 2009. How good can it get? Analysing and improving OCR accuracy in large scale historic newspaper digitisation programs. D-Lib Magazine, 15(3–4). [URL] (31 March 2021). Google Scholar
Howman, Brian. 2007. Abolitionism in Liverpool. In Liverpool and Transatlantic Slavery, David Richardson, Suzanne Schwarz & Anthony Tibbles (eds), 277–296. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. Google Scholar
Huzzey, Richard. 2010. Free trade, free labour, and slave sugar in Victorian Britain. The Historical Journal 53(2): 359–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. The slave trade and Victorian “humanity”. Victorian Review 40(1): 43–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joulain, Amelia T. 2017. Corpus Linguistics for History: The Methodology of Investigating Place-name Discourses. PhD dissertation, Lancaster University.
Kaufmann, Chaim D. & Pape, Robert A. 1999. Explaining costly international moral action: Britain’s sixty-year campaign against the Atlantic slave trade. International Organisation 53(4): 631–668. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
King, Edmund. 2005. Digitisation of newspapers at the British Library. The Serials Librarian 49(1): 165–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loy, Wesley. 1997. 10 Rumford Place: Doing confederate business in Liverpool. South Carolina Historical Society 98(4): 349–374. Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Baker, Helen. 2017. Corpus Linguistics and 17 th Century Prostitution. London: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony, Baker, Helen & Dayrell, Carmen. 2019. Working at the interface of hydrology and corpus linguistics: Using corpora to identify unrecorded droughts in nineteenth-century Britain. In Using Corpus Methods to Triangulate Linguistic Analysis, Jessie Egbert & Paul Baker (eds), 52–84. New York NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Tony, Brezina, Vaclav & Baker, Helen. 2019. Usage fluctuation analysis: A new way of analysing shifts in historical discourse. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24(4): 413–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan, K. 2007. Liverpool’s dominance in the British slave trade, 1740–1807. In Liverpool and Transatlantic Slavery, David Richardson, Suzanne Schwarz & Anthony Tibbles (eds),  14–42. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. Google Scholar
Mulligan, William. 2009. The fugitive slave circulars, 1875–76. Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 37(2): 183–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2003. The Linguistics of Political Argument: The Spin-Doctor and the Wolf Pack at the White House. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan, Duguid, Alison & Taylor, Charlotte. 2013. Patterns and Meanings in Discourse Theory and Practice in Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies (CADS) [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 55]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prescott, Andrew. 2014. I’d rather be a librarian: A response to Tim Hitchcock, confronting the digital. Cultural and Social History 11(3): 335–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sherwood, Marika. 2007. After Abolition: Britain and the Slave Trade since 1807. London: I.B. Tauris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sherwood, Marika & Sherwood, Kim (2007). Britain, the Slave Trade and Slavery, from 1562 to the 1880s. Kent: Savannah Press. Google Scholar
Smithers, Henry. 1825. Liverpool, its Commerce, Statistics, and Institutions: with a History of the Cotton Trade. Liverpool: Thomas Kaye. Google Scholar
Smitterberg, Erik. 2014. Syntactic stability and change in nineteenth-century newspaper language. In Late Modern English Syntax, Marianne Hundt (ed.), 311–330. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanner, Simon, Muñoz, Trevor & Ros, Pich H. 2009. Measuring mass text digitization quality and Usefulness. D-Lib Magazine 15 (7–8): 1082–9873. <[URL]> (31 March 2021). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Temperley, Howard. 1972. British Antislavery, 1833–1870. Columbia SC: University of South Carolina Press. Google Scholar
Thomas, Hugh. 1998. The Slave Trade: The History of the Atlantic Slave Trade 1440–1870. London: Papermac. Google Scholar
Walvin, James. 2001. Black Ivory: Slavery in the British Empire. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. The discourse-historical approach. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds), 63–94. London: Sage. Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Caple, Helen
2024. From other-representation to self-representation: exploring identity and activism in historical news media writing. Corpora 19:2 ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Gillings, Mathew & Carmen Dayrell
2024. Climate change in the UK press: Examining discourse fluctuation over time. Applied Linguistics 45:1 ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.